Literature DB >> 22159111

Noise in brain activity engenders perception and influences discrimination sensitivity.

Fosco Bernasconi1, Marzia De Lucia, Athina Tzovara, Aurelie L Manuel, Micah M Murray, Lucas Spierer.   

Abstract

Behavioral and brain responses to identical stimuli can vary with experimental and task parameters, including the context of stimulus presentation or attention. More surprisingly, computational models suggest that noise-related random fluctuations in brain responses to stimuli would alone be sufficient to engender perceptual differences between physically identical stimuli. In two experiments combining psychophysics and EEG in healthy humans, we investigated brain mechanisms whereby identical stimuli are (erroneously) perceived as different (higher vs lower in pitch or longer vs shorter in duration) in the absence of any change in the experimental context. Even though, as expected, participants' percepts to identical stimuli varied randomly, a classification algorithm based on a mixture of Gaussians model (GMM) showed that there was sufficient information in single-trial EEG to reliably predict participants' judgments of the stimulus dimension. By contrasting electrical neuroimaging analyses of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) to the identical stimuli as a function of participants' percepts, we identified the precise timing and neural correlates (strength vs topographic modulations) as well as intracranial sources of these erroneous perceptions. In both experiments, AEP differences first occurred ~100 ms after stimulus onset and were the result of topographic modulations following from changes in the configuration of active brain networks. Source estimations localized the origin of variations in perceived pitch of identical stimuli within right temporal and left frontal areas and of variations in perceived duration within right temporoparietal areas. We discuss our results in terms of providing neurophysiologic evidence for the contribution of random fluctuations in brain activity to conscious perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22159111      PMCID: PMC6634160          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3715-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

1.  Interval and ordinal properties of sequences are associated with distinct premotor areas.

Authors:  R I Schubotz; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing.

Authors:  S M Rao; A R Mayer; D L Harrington
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Event-related potential studies of attention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum?

Authors:  B Lütkenhöner; C Lammertmann; S Knecht
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Noninvasive localization of electromagnetic epileptic activity. I. Method descriptions and simulations.

Authors:  R Grave de Peralta Menendez; S Gonzalez Andino; G Lantz; C M Michel; T Landis
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task.

Authors:  D Ress; B T Backus; D J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  The processing of temporal pitch and melody information in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Roy D Patterson; Stefan Uppenkamp; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Electromagnetic inverse solutions in anatomically constrained spherical head models.

Authors:  L Spinelli; S G Andino; G Lantz; M Seeck; C M Michel
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Analysis of temporal structure in sound by the human brain.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; C Büchel; R S Frackowiak; R D Patterson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 10.  The neural processing of complex sounds.

Authors:  T D Griffiths
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  9 in total

1.  Neural detection of complex sound sequences in the absence of consciousness.

Authors:  Athina Tzovara; Alexandre Simonin; Mauro Oddo; Andrea O Rossetti; Marzia De Lucia
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Stability of the Cortical Sensory Waveforms, the P1-N1-P2 Complex and T-Complex, of Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Monica Wagner; Valerie L Shafer; Evis Haxhari; Kevin Kiprovski; Katherine Behrmann; Tara Griffiths
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Representation of spectro-temporal features of spoken words within the P1-N1-P2 and T-complex of the auditory evoked potentials (AEP).

Authors:  Monica Wagner; Arindam Roychoudhury; Luca Campanelli; Valerie L Shafer; Brett Martin; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  States and traits of neural irregularity in the age-varying human brain.

Authors:  Leonhard Waschke; Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Spontaneous cognitive processes and the behavioral validation of time-varying brain connectivity.

Authors:  Aaron Kucyi; Arielle Tambini; Sepideh Sadaghiani; Shella Keilholz; Jessica R Cohen
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-01

6.  Spatial and temporal influences on discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli on the arm.

Authors:  Valay A Shah; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt; Leigh A Mrotek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Human decision making based on variations in internal noise: an EEG study.

Authors:  Sygal Amitay; Jeanne Guiraud; Ediz Sohoglu; Oliver Zobay; Barrie A Edmonds; Yu-Xuan Zhang; David R Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Robust single trial identification of conscious percepts triggered by sensory events of variable saliency.

Authors:  Marta Teixeira; Gabriel Pires; Miguel Raimundo; Sérgio Nascimento; Vasco Almeida; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma.

Authors:  Christian Pfeiffer; Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo Nguissi; Magali Chytiris; Phanie Bidlingmeyer; Matthias Haenggi; Rebekka Kurmann; Frédéric Zubler; Ettore Accolla; Dragana Viceic; Marco Rusca; Mauro Oddo; Andrea O Rossetti; Marzia De Lucia
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 4.511

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.