| Literature DB >> 19284590 |
Carol-Anne Duthie1, Geoff Simm, Miguel Pérez-Enciso, Andrea Doeschl-Wilson, Ernst Kalm, Pieter W Knap, Rainer Roehe.
Abstract
A QTL analysis of pig chromosome X (SSCX) was carried out using an approach that accurately takes into account the specific features of sex chromosomes i.e. their heterogeneity, the presence of a pseudoautosomal region and the dosage compensation phenomenon. A three-generation full-sib population of 386 animals was created by crossing Pietrain sires with a crossbred dam line. Phenotypic data on 72 traits were recorded for at least 292 and up to 315 F2 animals including chemical body composition measured on live animals at five target weights ranging from 30 to 140 kg, daily gain and feed intake measured throughout growth, and carcass characteristics obtained at slaughter weight (140 kg). Several significant and suggestive QTL were detected on pig chromosome X: (1) in the pseudoautosomal region of SSCX, a QTL for entire loin weight, which showed paternal imprinting, (2) closely linked to marker SW2456, a suggestive QTL for feed intake at which Pietrain alleles were found to be associated with higher feed intake, which is unexpected for a breed known for its low feed intake capacity, (3) at the telomeric end of the q arm of SSCX, QTL for jowl weight and lipid accretion and (4) suggestive QTL for chemical body composition at 30 kg. These results indicate that SSCX is important for physical and chemical body composition and accretion as well as feed intake regulation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19284590 PMCID: PMC2666071 DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Sel Evol ISSN: 0999-193X Impact factor: 4.297
Markers used in the present QTL mapping project, their relative map position based on the USDA pig map, their position from linkage analysis using CRIMAP in this experimental population, number of different alleles, heterozygosity in F1 generation (H) and polymorphic information content in the F2 generation (PIC)
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 6 | 0.65 | 0.53 | |
| 11.9 | 36.2 | 7 | 0.87 | 0.80 | |
| 33.0 | 46.4 | 5 | 0.87 | 0.70 | |
| 55.4 | 56.5 | 6 | 0.81 | 0.67 | |
| 74.4 | 63.6 | 5 | 0.89 | 0.70 | |
| 87.4 | 73.5 | 5 | 0.70 | 0.70 | |
| 107.9 | 78.2 | 4 | 0.49 | 0.59 | |
| 128.4 | 79.8 | 4 | 0.25 | 0.37 |
Evidence for quantitative trait loci (QTL) for carcass cuts, chemical body composition, lipid accretion and feed intake on pig chromosome X
| Entire loin weight (g) | 11.56** | 7 (0–27) | 3.7 | - | |
| Loin weight without external fat (g) | 7.68a | 11 (0–33) | 2.5 | - | |
| Jowl weight (g) | 17.91** | 128.4 (106–128.4) | 5.8 | 57.4 ± 37.6 | |
| Lipid cont. empty body, 30 kg (%) | 10.38a | 83 (68–108) | 3.3 | -0.496 ± 0.259 | |
| Protein cont. empty body, 30 kg (%) | 10.43a | 83 (68–109) | 3.8 | 0.011 ± 0.006 | |
| Protein cont. FFSEB, 30 kg (%) | 9.36a | 82 (59–128.4) | 3.1 | ||
| LAR 90–120 g (g/day) | 9.60* | 128.4 (78–128.4) | 3.2 | - | |
| DFI 120–140 g (g/day) | 7.00a | 56 (36–83) | 2.3 | - | |
1Traits of FFSEB, LAR and DFI denote fat-free substance of the empty body, lipid accretion rate, daily feed intake, respectively
2LR represents likelihood ratio values and superscript aimplies a suggestive QTL at the 10% chromosome-wide level, whereas * and ** imply significant QTL at the 5% or 1% chromosome-wide levels, respectively
3Positions of the QTL in cM based on the USDA reference map and confidence intervals (CI) in brackets
4Percentages of F2 variance explained by the QTL calculated as the proportion of residual variances due to the QTL effect on the residual variances excluding the QTL effect
5Estimated additive (a) and dominance (d) effects and their standard errors (SE); estimates in bold represent significant additive or dominance effects
Evidence for quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with imprinting effects in the pseudoautosomal region
| Entire loin weight (g) | 10.07* | 6 (0–28) | 3.2 | Paternal | |
| Neck weight without external fat5 (g) | 8.85* | 1 (0–13) | 2.8 | Maternal | |
1LR represents likelihood ratio values and * implies a significant QTL at the 5% chromosome-wide level
2Positions of the QTL in cM based on the USDA reference map and confidence intervals (CI) in brackets
3Percentages of F2 variance explained by the QTL calculated as the proportion of residual variances due to the QTL effect on the residual variances excluding the QTL effect
4Estimated additive (a) effects and their standard errors (SE); estimates in bold represent significant additive effects
5New QTL only identified when the imprinting effect is included in the model
Figure 1Likelihood ratio curves for evidence of significant quantitative trait loci for entire loin weight, jowl weight and lipid accretion rate (LAR) 90–120 kg on SSCX. Positions in cM are based on the USDA reference map.
Figure 2Likelihood ratio curves for evidence of suggestive quantitative trait loci for loin weight without external fat, protein content of the empty body at 30 kg body weight and daily feed intake (DFI) 120–140 kg on SSCX. Positions in cM are based on the USDA reference map.