Literature DB >> 19282775

The interface of Medicare coverage decision-making and emerging molecular-based laboratory testing.

Mitchell I Burken1, Kathleen S Wilson, Karen Heller, Victoria M Pratt, Michele M Schoonmaker, Eric Seifter.   

Abstract

The process of obtaining Medicare coverage for clinical services (both at the national and local levels) can be complex and often leads to considerable confusion among external stakeholders. The entry of molecular diagnostic testing into the clinical arena of laboratory medicine has posed some special challenges, both for those providing the testing, and those paying for such technology. This commentary will seek to clarify Medicare's pursuit of defining medical necessity by describing both the local and national Medicare coverage policy processes. However, it should be understood that the Medicare reimbursement for such esoteric testing is a work-in-progress, without an established step-by-step process for obtaining a positive coverage decision. Yet, this evolving process provides all stakeholders (payers, laboratories, industry, clinicians, etc.) with an opportunity to fully understand the health policy implications of complex molecular diagnostic testing. In addition, brief case study vignettes are incorporated into our discussion, to show how laboratorians, in conjunction with their clinical colleagues, can effectively engage the payer community in developing more medically sound and fiscally responsible coverage policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19282775     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181976829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  6 in total

Review 1.  Communication and technology in genetic counseling for familial cancer.

Authors:  H T Lynch; C Snyder; M Stacey; B Olson; S K Peterson; S Buxbaum; T Shaw; P M Lynch
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Eligibility criteria in private and public coverage policies for BRCA genetic testing and genetic counseling.

Authors:  Grace Wang; Mary S Beattie; Ninez A Ponce; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Implementation of the 21-gene recurrence score test in the United States in 2011.

Authors:  Julie A Lynch; Brygida Berse; Valentina Petkov; Kelly Filipski; Yingjun Zhou; Muin J Khoury; Michael Hassett; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  A window into living with an undiagnosed disease: illness narratives from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network.

Authors:  Rebecca C Spillmann; Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Loren Pena; Yong-Hui Jiang; Kelly Schoch; Nicole Walley; Camilla Sanders; Jennifer Sullivan; Stephen R Hooper; Vandana Shashi
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 6.  Molecular Pathology Economics 101: An Overview of Molecular Diagnostics Coding, Coverage, and Reimbursement: A Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Anthony N Sireci; Jay L Patel; Loren Joseph; Matthew C Hiemenz; Oana C Rosca; Samuel K Caughron; Sarah A Thibault-Sennett; Tara L Burke; Dara L Aisner
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.568

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.