Literature DB >> 19280974

Effectiveness of surface protection for glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified composite resins.

Serpil Karaoğlanoğlu1, Nilgün Akgül, Hatice Nur Ozdabak, Hayati Murat Akgül.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of several surface protectors for a glass-ionomer, a resin-modified glass-ionomer, and a polyacid-modified resin cement by determining dye uptake spectrophotometrically. 378 samples, made up of Ionofil U, Vitremer, and Dyract, were prepared and divided into groups of seven each. Positive and negative control specimens remained unprotected while the experimental specimens were protected with Finishing Gloss, Protect-It, LC Varnish, Adper Single Bond, or a nail varnish. The experimental groups and positive controls were immersed in 0.05% methylene blue solution, while the negative controls were immersed in deionized water. Results were evaluated using variance analysis. Of the Ionofil U group, Adper Single Bond exhibited the least effective surface coating among the materials tested, while the best surface protection was obtained with LC Varnish in the Dyract group. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the Vitremer group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19280974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater J        ISSN: 0287-4547            Impact factor:   2.102


  8 in total

1.  Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.

Authors:  Philippe Francois; Elsa Vennat; Stéphane Le Goff; Nathalie Ruscassier; Jean-Pierre Attal; Elisabeth Dursun
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for uncooperative patients according to surface protection treatment.

Authors:  Edoardo Pacifici; Maurizio Bossù; Agostino Giovannetti; Giuseppe La Torre; Fabrizio Guerra; Antonella Polimeni
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-02-04

3.  Investigation of water sorption and aluminum releases from high viscosity and resin modified glass ionomer.

Authors:  Numan Aydın; Serpil Karaoğlanoğlu; Elif Aybala-Oktay; Serdar Çetinkaya; Onur Erdem
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-09-01

4.  Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin.

Authors:  Foad Faraji; Haleh Heshmat; Sepideh Banava
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

5.  Performance of fissure sealants on fully erupted permanent molars with incipient carious lesions: A glass-ionomer-based versus a resin-based sealant.

Authors:  Nada Jaafar; Hala Ragab; Ahmed Abedrahman; Essam Osman
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2020

6.  Microhardness of glass carbomer and high-viscous glass Ionomer cement in different thickness and thermo-light curing durations after thermocycling aging.

Authors:  Mehmet Buldur; Emine Sirin Karaarslan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Wear of two pit and fissure sealants in contact with primary teeth.

Authors:  Rodrigo Galo; Marta Maria Martins Giamatei Contente; Maria Cristina Borsatto
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-04

8.  A comparative evaluation of resin- and varnish-based surface protective agents on glass ionomer cement - a spectrophotometric analysis.

Authors:  Shreya Tyagi; Abi M Thomas; Neeta Devi Sinnappah-Kang
Journal:  Biomater Investig Dent       Date:  2020-01-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.