Literature DB >> 19280548

Peripheral intravenous power injection of iodinated contrast media through 22G and 20G cannulas: can high flow rates be achieved safely? A clinical feasibility study.

S A Schwab1, M Uder, K Anders, M C Heinrich, M A Kuefner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Modern examination protocols for computed tomography (CT) often require high injection rates of iodinated contrast media (CM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the maximum achievable flow rates and stability of different peripheral intravenous catheters (IVC) in vitro and to assess the feasibility of higher injection rates through small IVC in vivo.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For in vitro experiments flow measurements followed by high pressure testing of different types of IVC (22, 20, and 18 gauge [G]) were performed. For the in vitro study 91 patients with already inserted 22 or 20G IVC who had been referred for CT received Iopamidol (300 mg iodine/ml) at flow rates between 2 and 5 ml/sec. Complications were documented.
RESULTS: The maximal achievable flow rate of the tested IVC in vitro ranged from 5 to 8 ml/sec. No damage was observed during in vitro testing. The initially targeted in vivo flow rate was dropped in 33 of 91 (36 %) patients because the IVC could not be flushed adequately with saline before CM injection. Extravasation of CM occurred in 2 cases. In the remaining 58 patients the standard CT protocol was performed with flow rates of 3 ml/sec through 22G IVC and 5 ml/sec through 20G IVC, respectively. In this group, the extravasation of CM was observed twice (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Even with highly viscous CM, high flow rates can be applied in vitro in 22, 20, and 18G IVC without risking material damage. In vivo power injection of iodinated CM through 22G and 20G IVC seems to be safely achievable in the majority of patients with flow rates of up to 3 ml/sec and 5 ml/sec. Extravasation rates do not differ significantly between patients with high-flow or low-flow injections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19280548     DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  7 in total

1.  Frequency, outcome, and risk factors of contrast media extravasation in 142,651 intravenous contrast-enhanced CT scans.

Authors:  Eui Jin Hwang; Cheong-Il Shin; Young Hun Choi; Chang Min Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Multidetector CT in children: current concepts and dose reduction strategies.

Authors:  Rutger A J Nievelstein; Ingrid M van Dam; Aart J van der Molen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-06-10

3.  Contrast media extravasations in patients undergoing computerized tomography scanning: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors and interventions.

Authors:  Sandrine Ding; Nicole Richli Meystre; Cosmin Campeanu; Giuseppe Gullo
Journal:  JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep       Date:  2018-01

4.  Rethinking Intravenous Catheter Size and Location for Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography.

Authors:  Travis Marshall; Nae Meng Chen; Eric Nguyen; David E Slattery; Tony Zitek
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-06

5.  An audit of the adequacy of contrast enhancement in CT pulmonary angiograms in a South African tertiary academic hospital setting.

Authors:  Derik J Basson; Halvani Moodley
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2022-03-24

6.  Intravenous contrast medium extravasation: systematic review and updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee Guidelines.

Authors:  Giles Roditi; Nadir Khan; Aart J van der Molen; Marie-France Bellin; Michele Bertolotto; Torkel Brismar; Jean-Michel Correas; Ilona A Dekkers; Remy W F Geenen; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Andreas H Mahnken; Carlo C Quattrocchi; Alexander Radbruch; Peter Reimer; Laura Romanini; Fulvio Stacul; Henrik S Thomsen; Olivier Clément
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 7.034

7.  More holes, more contrast? Comparing an 18-gauge non-fenestrated catheter with a 22-gauge fenestrated catheter for cardiac CT.

Authors:  Andreas Marco Fischer; Philipp Riffel; Thomas Henzler; U Joseph Schoepf; Andres F Abadia; Richard Robert Bayer; Holger Haubenreisser; Dante Giovagnoli; Alexander Kremer; Stefan O Schoenberg; Joshua Gawlitza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.