Literature DB >> 19280082

[Current imaging for rectal cancer].

M S Juchems1, A J Aschoff.   

Abstract

Rectal cancer is one of the most common causes of death from cancer. Accurate staging is necessary for optimal treatment. The tumor node metastasis (TNM) system is used to describe numerically the anatomical extent of cancer. Various diagnostic methods provide accurate staging. Endorectal ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic resonance tomography (MR) are most adequate for determining tumor stage. Moreover, MR is highly accurate in predicting the circumferential resection margin. Accurate node staging remains however difficult with both EUS and MR. Modern multidetector row CT is predestined for detecting distant metastases as it is a widespread, fast, and reproducible method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19280082     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-008-1619-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  23 in total

1.  Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  N K Kim; M J Kim; S H Yun; S K Sohn; J S Min
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Accuracy of thin section magnetic resonance using phased-array pelvic coil in predicting the T-staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  F W Poon; A McDonald; J H Anderson; F Duthie; C Rodger; G McCurrach; R F McKee; P G Horgan; A K Foulis; D Chong; I G Finlay
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Staging rectal cancer: MRI compared to MDCT.

Authors:  Alasdair Taylor; Andrew Slater; Nicholas Mapstone; Stuart Taylor; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2007 May-Jun

4.  Prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound, three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound, and endorectal MRI in the preoperative evaluation of rectal tumors. Preliminary results.

Authors:  M Hünerbein; W Pegios; B Rau; T J Vogl; R Felix; P M Schlag
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Diagnostic precision of nanoparticle-enhanced MRI for lymph-node metastases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Olivia Will; Sanjay Purkayastha; Christopher Chan; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara W Darzi; Wady Gedroyc; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Routine use of transrectal ultrasound in rectal carcinoma: results of a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  F Marusch; A Koch; U Schmidt; R Zippel; R Kuhn; S Wolff; M Pross; A Wierth; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopathologic findings--initial observations.

Authors:  Dow-Mu Koh; Gina Brown; Louis Temple; Asraf Raja; Paul Toomey; Nicholas Bett; Andrew R Norman; Janet E Husband
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Detection and staging of primary rectal and rectosigmoid cancer by computed tomography.

Authors:  R F Thoeni; A A Moss; P Schnyder; A R Margulis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Local staging of rectal cancer: assessment with double-contrast multislice computed tomography and transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  Christiane Kulinna; Juergen Scheidler; Tim Strauss; Harald Bonel; Karin Herrmann; Daniela Aust; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Rectal cancer: evaluation of staging with endosonography.

Authors:  G E Lindmark; W G Kraaz; P A Elvin; B L Glimelius
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Staging of rectal cancer].

Authors:  C T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.955

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.