Literature DB >> 15664289

Accuracy of thin section magnetic resonance using phased-array pelvic coil in predicting the T-staging of rectal cancer.

F W Poon1, A McDonald, J H Anderson, F Duthie, C Rodger, G McCurrach, R F McKee, P G Horgan, A K Foulis, D Chong, I G Finlay.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may contribute to staging rectal cancer and inform the decision regarding administration of pre-operative radiotherapy. The accuracy of MR has been debated. The aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy of thin section T2-weighted MR images in rectal cancer patients. MR results were compared with histological assessment of resection specimens. Over a 2-year period, 42 patients were studied. Histological staging was pT2 n = 13, pT3 n = 25 and pT4 n = 4. MR diagnostic accuracy was 74%. MR sensitivity and specificity was 62% and 79% for pT2 lesions, 84% and 59% for pT3 lesions and 50% and 76% for pT4 lesions. Estimation of tumour penetration by thin section MR imaging of rectal cancers using pelvic phased-array coil has moderate diagnostic accuracy. The limitations of MR should be acknowledged when selecting rectal cancer patients for pre-operative radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15664289     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  9 in total

Review 1.  Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Suk Hee Heo; Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung-Keun Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  [Current imaging for rectal cancer].

Authors:  M S Juchems; A J Aschoff
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  SEOM/SERAM consensus statement on radiological diagnosis, response assessment and follow-up in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R García-Carbonero; R Vera; F Rivera; E Parlorio; M Pagés; E González-Flores; C Fernández-Martos; M Á Corral; R Bouzas; F Matute
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Assessment of T staging and mesorectal fascia status using high-resolution MRI in rectal cancer with rectal distention.

Authors:  Sheng-Xiang Rao; Meng-Su Zeng; Jian-Ming Xu; Xin-Yu Qin; Cai-Zhong Chen; Ren-Chen Li; Ying-Yong Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Optimizing adjuvant treatment decisions for stage t2 rectal cancer based on mesorectal node size: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca I Hartman; Connie Y Chang; Jennifer Y Wo; Jonathan D Eisenberg; Theodore S Hong; Mukesh G Harisinghani; G Scott Gazelle; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  [Rational staging and follow-up of colorectal cancer : Do guidelines provide further help?]

Authors:  M S Juchems; J Wessling
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-08-15

Review 8.  Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI.

Authors:  Christian Klessen; Patrik Rogalla; Matthias Taupitz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Assessment of T and N staging with MRI3T in lower and middle rectal cancer and impact on clinical strategy.

Authors:  Liping Xu; Zhaoyue Zhang; Qin Qin; Chi Zhang; Xinchen Sun
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.