BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a risk factor for Alzheimer disease and can be difficult to diagnose because of the subtlety of symptoms. This study attempted to examine gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) changes with cortical thickness analysis and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in patients with MCI and demographically matched comparison subjects to test these measurements as possible imaging markers for diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects with amnestic MCI (n = 10; age, 72.2 +/- 7.1 years) and normal cognition (n = 10; age, 70.1 +/- 7.7 years) underwent DTI and T1-weighted MR imaging at 3T. Fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and cortical thickness were measured and compared between the MCI and control groups. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 2 methods, either in combination or separately, using binary logistic regression and nonparametric statistical analyses for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. RESULTS: Decreased FA and increased ADC in WM regions of the frontal and temporal lobes and corpus callosum (CC) were observed in patients with MCI. Cortical thickness was decreased in GM regions of the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes in patients with MCI. Changes in WM and cortical thickness seemed to be more pronounced in the left hemisphere compared with the right hemisphere. Furthermore, the combination of cortical thickness and DTI measurements in the left temporal areas improved the accuracy of differentiating MCI patients from control subjects compared with either measure alone. CONCLUSIONS: DTI and cortical thickness analyses may both serve as imaging markers to differentiate MCI from normal aging. Combined use of these 2 methods may improve the accuracy of MCI diagnosis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a risk factor for Alzheimer disease and can be difficult to diagnose because of the subtlety of symptoms. This study attempted to examine gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) changes with cortical thickness analysis and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in patients with MCI and demographically matched comparison subjects to test these measurements as possible imaging markers for diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects with amnestic MCI (n = 10; age, 72.2 +/- 7.1 years) and normal cognition (n = 10; age, 70.1 +/- 7.7 years) underwent DTI and T1-weighted MR imaging at 3T. Fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and cortical thickness were measured and compared between the MCI and control groups. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 2 methods, either in combination or separately, using binary logistic regression and nonparametric statistical analyses for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. RESULTS: Decreased FA and increased ADC in WM regions of the frontal and temporal lobes and corpus callosum (CC) were observed in patients with MCI. Cortical thickness was decreased in GM regions of the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes in patients with MCI. Changes in WM and cortical thickness seemed to be more pronounced in the left hemisphere compared with the right hemisphere. Furthermore, the combination of cortical thickness and DTI measurements in the left temporal areas improved the accuracy of differentiating MCI patients from control subjects compared with either measure alone. CONCLUSIONS: DTI and cortical thickness analyses may both serve as imaging markers to differentiate MCI from normal aging. Combined use of these 2 methods may improve the accuracy of MCI diagnosis.
Authors: June Sic Kim; Vivek Singh; Jun Ki Lee; Jason Lerch; Yasser Ad-Dab'bagh; David MacDonald; Jong Min Lee; Sun I Kim; Alan C Evans Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: David Medina; Leyla DeToledo-Morrell; Fabio Urresta; John D E Gabrieli; Michael Moseley; Debra Fleischman; David A Bennett; Sue Leurgans; David A Turner; Glenn T Stebbins Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2005-07-07 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: T R Stoub; M Bulgakova; S Leurgans; D A Bennett; D Fleischman; D A Turner; L deToledo-Morrell Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-05-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jason P Lerch; Jens C Pruessner; Alex Zijdenbos; Harald Hampel; Stefan J Teipel; Alan C Evans Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2004-11-10 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: James T Becker; Simon W Davis; Kiralee M Hayashi; Carolyn Cidis Meltzer; Arthur W Toga; Oscar L Lopez; Paul M Thompson Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2006-01
Authors: Andreas Fellgiebel; Matthias J Müller; Paulo Wille; Paulo R Dellani; Armin Scheurich; Lutz G Schmidt; Peter Stoeter Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2005-01-12 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Dajiang Zhu; Kaiming Li; Douglas P Terry; A Nicholas Puente; Lihong Wang; Dinggang Shen; L Stephen Miller; Tianming Liu Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Nikki H Stricker; David H Salat; Jessica M Foley; Tyler A Zink; Ida L Kellison; Craig P McFarland; Laura J Grande; Regina E McGlinchey; William P Milberg; Elizabeth C Leritz Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Nikki H Stricker; David H Salat; Taylor P Kuhn; Jessica M Foley; Jenessa S Price; Lars T Westlye; Michael S Esterman; Regina E McGlinchey; William P Milberg; Elizabeth C Leritz Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Paula T Trzepacz; Peng Yu; Phani K Bhamidipati; Brian Willis; Tammy Forrester; Linda Tabas; Adam J Schwarz; Andrew J Saykin Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: S M Hadi Hosseini; Jessica M Black; Teresa Soriano; Nicolle Bugescu; Rociel Martinez; Mira M Raman; Shelli R Kesler; Fumiko Hoeft Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Erin L Boespflug; Judd Storrs; Sara Sadat-Hossieny; James Eliassen; Marcelle Shidler; Matthew Norris; Robert Krikorian Journal: Brain Struct Funct Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 3.270