Literature DB >> 19279150

Directional sensitivity of "first trial" reactions in human balance control.

Lars B Oude Nijhuis1, John H J Allum, George F Borm, Flurin Honegger, Sebastiaan Overeem, Bastiaan R Bloem.   

Abstract

Support-surface movements are commonly used to examine balance control. Subjects typically receive a series of identical or randomly interspersed multidirectional balance perturbations and the atypical "first trial reaction" (evoked by the first perturbation) is often excluded from further analysis. However, this procedure may obscure vital information about neurophysiological mechanisms associated with the first perturbation and, by analogy, fully unexpected falls. We studied first trial reactions, aiming to clarify their directional impact on postural control and to characterize the underlying neurophysiological substrate. We instructed 36 subjects to maintain balance following support-surface rotations in six different directions. Perturbations in each direction were delivered in blocks, consisting of 10 serial stimuli. Full body kinematics, surface reactive forces, and electromyographic (EMG) responses were recorded. Regardless of direction, for the very first rotation, displacement of the center of mass was 15% larger compared with the ensuing nine identical rotations (P < 0.0001). This first trial reaction immediately reemerged whenever a new perturbation direction was introduced. First trial reactions (and near-falls) were greatest for backward-directed rotations and smallest for laterally directed rotations. This directional dependence coincided with early changes in vertical head accelerations. First trial reactions in EMG responses involved larger amplitudes in general and earlier muscle response onsets in upper body muscles. These findings show that first trial reactions are associated with significantly increased postural instability, mainly due to increased response amplitudes. Although rapid habituation occurs following presentation of identical stimuli, subjects immediately become unstable again when the perturbation direction suddenly changes. Excessive responses due to a failure to combine proprioceptive and vestibular cues effectively may explain this instability seen with first trials, particularly when falling backward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19279150     DOI: 10.1152/jn.90945.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  The effect of voluntary lateral trunk bending on balance recovery following multi-directional stance perturbations.

Authors:  U M Küng; C G C Horlings; F Honegger; J H J Allum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Protective balance and startle responses to sudden freefall in standing humans.

Authors:  Ozell P Sanders; Douglas N Savin; Robert A Creath; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Cognition and balance control: does processing of explicit contextual cues of impending perturbations modulate automatic postural responses?

Authors:  Daniel Boari Coelho; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Assessing Head/Neck Dynamic Response to Head Perturbation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Enora Le Flao; Matt Brughelli; Patria A Hume; Doug King
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Directional acuity of whole-body perturbations during standing balance.

Authors:  M Jane Puntkattalee; Clarissa J Whitmire; Alix S Macklin; Garrett B Stanley; Lena H Ting
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Aging does not affect the intralimb coordination elicited by slip-like perturbation of different intensities.

Authors:  Federica Aprigliano; Dario Martelli; Peppino Tropea; Guido Pasquini; Silvestro Micera; Vito Monaco
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Axial reflexes are present in older subjects and may contribute to balance responses.

Authors:  James G Colebatch; Sendhil Govender
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Compensatory control between the legs in automatic postural responses to stance perturbations under single-leg fatigue.

Authors:  Carla Daniele Pacheco Rinaldin; Júlia Avila de Oliveira; Caroline Ribeiro de Souza; Eduardo Mendonça Scheeren; Daniel Boari Coelho; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Aging changes in protective balance and startle responses to sudden drop perturbations.

Authors:  Ozell Sanders; Hao Yuan Hsiao; Douglas N Savin; Robert A Creath; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Postural motor learning in people with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Daniel S Peterson; Bauke W Dijkstra; Fay B Horak
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.