Literature DB >> 33388814

Compensatory control between the legs in automatic postural responses to stance perturbations under single-leg fatigue.

Carla Daniele Pacheco Rinaldin1, Júlia Avila de Oliveira2, Caroline Ribeiro de Souza2, Eduardo Mendonça Scheeren3, Daniel Boari Coelho2,4, Luis Augusto Teixeira2.   

Abstract

In response to sudden perturbations of stance stability, muscles of both legs are activated for balance recovery. In conditions that one of the legs has a reduced capacity to respond, the opposite leg is predicted to compensate by responding more powerfully to restore stable upright stance. In this investigation, we aimed to evaluate between-leg compensatory control in automatic postural responses to sudden perturbations in a situation in which plantar flexor muscles of a single leg were fatigued. Young participants were evaluated in response to a series of perturbations inducing forward body sway, with a focus on activation of plantar flexor muscles: lateral and medial gastrocnemii and soleus. Muscular responses were analyzed through activation magnitude and latency of muscular activation onset. For evaluation of balance and postural stability, we also analyzed the center of pressure and upper trunk displacement and weight-bearing asymmetry between the legs. Responses were assessed in three conditions: pre-fatigue, under single-leg fatigue, and following the recovery of muscular function. Results showed (a) compensation of the non-fatigued leg through the increased magnitude of muscular activation in the first perturbation under fatigue; (b) adaptation in the non-fatigued leg over repetitive perturbations, with a progressive decrement of muscular activation over trials; and (c) maintenance of increased muscular activation of the non-fatigued leg following fatigue dissipation. These findings suggest that the central nervous system is able to modulate the descending motor drive individually for each leg's muscles apparently based on their potential contribution for the achievement of the behavioral aim of recovering stable body balance following stance perturbations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation; After-effect; Body balance; Compensation; First trial; Reactive response

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33388814     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-06003-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  68 in total

1.  Altered reflex sensitivity after repeated and prolonged passive muscle stretching.

Authors:  J Avela; H Kyröläinen; P V Komi
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-04

2.  Cortical responses associated with predictable and unpredictable compensatory balance reactions.

Authors:  Allan L Adkin; Sylvia Quant; Brian E Maki; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Task and intensity alters the RMS proportionality ratio in the triceps surae.

Authors:  Nick Ball; Joanna Clare Scurr
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

5.  Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?

Authors:  María J Blanca; Rafael Alarcón; Jaume Arnau; Roser Bono; Rebecca Bendayan
Journal:  Psicothema       Date:  2017-11

6.  Triggering of balance corrections and compensatory strategies in a patient with total leg proprioceptive loss.

Authors:  B R Bloem; J H J Allum; M G Carpenter; J J G M Verschuuren; F Honegger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Automatic postural responses are generated according to feet orientation and perturbation magnitude.

Authors:  Nametala Maia Azzi; Daniel Boari Coelho; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Unilateral lower limb muscle fatigue induces bilateral effects on undisturbed stance and muscle EMG activities.

Authors:  L L Berger; S C Regueme; N Forestier
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.368

9.  Opioid-mediated muscle afferents inhibit central motor drive and limit peripheral muscle fatigue development in humans.

Authors:  Markus Amann; Lester T Proctor; Joshua J Sebranek; David F Pegelow; Jerome A Dempsey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Central fatigue as revealed by postexercise decrement of motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  J P Brasil-Neto; L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.