Literature DB >> 19277416

Comparison of activated clotting times obtained using Hemochron and Medtronic analysers in patients receiving anti-thrombin therapy during cardiac catheterisation.

Stanley Chia1, Elizabeth M Van Cott, O Christopher Raffel, Ik-Kyung Jang.   

Abstract

Accurate monitoring of anti-thrombin therapy with activated clotting time (ACT) is important to prevent thrombotic and haemorrhagic complications during cardiac catheterisation. Significant variability in ACT tests exists when different analysers are used. Our objective was to compare ACT results obtained using Hemochron and Medtronic ACT PLUS devices and antiXa activity in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. Thirty-two patients who received unfractionated heparin or argatroban therapy during cardiac catheterisation were enrolled. Blood sampling was performed to determine ACT values using Hemochron and Medtronic (with high-range cartridges) devices in all patients (n = 130 pairs), and anti-Xa activity following heparin administration. In the heparin group, ACT tests (n = 95 pairs) showed very good correlation (r = 0.84, y = 1.31x-0.81; p<0.001). However, Hemochron values were consistently higher and the difference more pronounced with increasing ACT (for ACT>150 sec, mean difference 65 +/- 48 sec; p<0.001). Both Hemochron and Medtronic ACT tests correlated well with plasma anti-Xa levels (r = 0.85, r = 0.81, respectively; p<0.001); Hemochron ACT>300 sec corresponded to anti-Xa>1.48 IU/ml. With concomitant eptifibatide therapy, the divergence in ACT was greater compared to heparin alone. In the argatroban group, ACT tests (n = 35 pairs) demonstrated excellent correlation (r = 0.94, y = 0.61x+79.9; p<0.001). In contrast to the heparin group, ACT values were higher with Medtronic compared to Hemochron. Therefore, despite good correlation between Hemochron and Medtronic ACT results, and strong association with anti-Xa activity, Medtronic ACT values were consistently lower compared to Hemochron following heparin anticoagulation. Paradoxically, Medtronic ACT results were higher after argatroban therapy. Understanding this discrepancy is crucial when using ACT to guide invasive cardiac procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19277416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  4 in total

Review 1.  Point-of-care testing for anticoagulation monitoring in neuroendovascular procedures.

Authors:  H M Hussein; A L Georgiadis; A I Qureshi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Periprocedural management of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in direct oral anticoagulant-treated patients.

Authors:  Anne-Céline Martin; Sarah Lessire; Isabelle Leblanc; Anne-Sophie Dincq; Ivan Philip; Isabelle Gouin-Thibault; Anne Godier
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution.

Authors:  Jung Min Lee; Eun Young Park; Kyung Mi Kim; Jong Chan Won; Tack Koon Jung; Soo Kyung Lee
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Point-of-care measurement of activated clotting time for cardiac surgery as measured by the Hemochron signature elite and the Abbott i-STAT: agreement, concordance, and clinical reliability.

Authors:  Daniel Dirkmann; Elisabeth Nagy; Martin W Britten; Jürgen Peters
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.