| Literature DB >> 19277201 |
Shinji Kume1, Takashi Uzu, Keiji Isshiki, Daisuke Koya.
Abstract
Diabetic nephropathy is a leading cause of end-stage renal disease, which is increasing in incidence worldwide, despite intensive treatment approaches such as glycemic and blood pressure control in patients with diabetes mellitus. New therapeutic strategies are needed to prevent the onset of diabetic nephropathy. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated nuclear transcription factors that play important roles in lipid and glucose homeostases. These agents might prevent the progression of diabetic nephropathy, since PPAR agonists improve dyslipidemia and insulin resistance. Furthermore, data from murine models suggest that PPAR agonists also have independent renoprotective effects by suppressing inflammation, oxidative stress, lipotoxicity, and activation of the renin-angiotensin system. This review summarizes data from clinical and experimental studies regarding the relationship between PPARs and diabetic nephropathy. The therapeutic potential of PPAR agonists in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy is also discussed.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19277201 PMCID: PMC2652581 DOI: 10.1155/2008/879523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PPAR Res Impact factor: 4.964
Figure 1Structure and action of PPARs. (a) Domain structure of human PPARs. (b) Molecular mechanism of PPARs. After ligand binding, PPARs undergo conformational change with RXR and cofactors.
Animal studies.
| Authors | TZD | Animal model | Duration | Effect on UAE | Effect on BP | Other effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model of type 1 diabetes | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Fujii et al. [ | Tro | STZ-induced diabetic rats | 12 weeks | ↓ | NS | ND |
| Isshiki et al. [ | Tro | STZ-induced diabetic rats | 12 weeks | ↓ | ND | Hyperfiltration ↓ |
| Nicholas et al. [ | Tro | STZ-induced diabetic rats | 12 weeks | ↓ | NS | ND |
| Yamashita et al. [ | Tro, pio | STZ-induced diabetic SHR rats | 12 weeks | ↓ | NS | Loss of glomerular basement membranes ↓ |
|
| ||||||
| Model of type 2 diabetes | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Yoshioka et al. [ | Tro | Obese Zucker rats | 4 and 8 weeks | ↓ | ↓ | ND |
| Fujiwara et al. [ | Tro | Wistar fatty rats | 24 weeks | ↓ | ↓ | ND |
| Yoshimoto et al. [ | Pio | Diabetic Wistar fatty rats | 13 weeks | ↓ | ↓ | Glomerulosclerosis ↓ intrarenal arteriolosclerosis ↓ |
| Tanimoto et al. [ | Pio | Diabetic KK/Ta mice | 4 and 8 weeks | ↓ | NS | Glomerular enlargement ↓ |
| Buckingham et al. [ | Rosi | Obese Zucker rats | 4 and 9 months | ↓ | ↓ | Glomerulosclerosis ↓ tubulointerstitial fibrosis ↓ |
| Baylis et al. [ | Rosi | Obese Zucker rats | 6 months | ↓ | NS | Glomerulosclerosis ↓ tubulointerstitial fibrosis ↓ |
| Khan et al. [ | Rosi | Obese Zucker rats | 12 weeks | ↓ | ↓ | ND |
TZD, thiazolidinedione; Tro, troglitazone; Pio, pioglitazone; Rosi, rosiglitazone; STZ, streptozotocin; SHR, spontaneously hypertensive rats; UAE, urinary albumin excretion; BP, blood pressure; NS, no significant effects; ND: not determined; ↓, significant reductions.
Human clinical studies.
| Authors | subjects (Type 2 DM) |
| regimens | Duration | Effect on UAE (%) | Effect on BP (mmHg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sironi et al. [ | hyp | 40 | 200 mg toroglitazone versus plb | 8 weeks | +11% | −4/−3 |
|
| ||||||
| Imano et al. [ | mA, hyp | 30 | 400 mg toroglitazone versus 500 mg metformin | 12 weeks | −39%a | −3/0 |
|
| ||||||
| Nakamura et al. [ | mA or MA | 32 | 400 mg toroglitazone versus 5 mg glibenclamide | 12 months | −67%ain mA 0% in MA | −6c |
|
| ||||||
| Nakamura et al. [ | mA | 45 | 30 mg Pio versus 5 mg glibenclamide versus 0.6 mg Vog | 3 months | −66%a | −6/−4 |
|
| ||||||
| Nakamura et al. [ | mA | 28 | 30 mg Pio versus plb | 6 months | −59%a | −4c |
|
| ||||||
| Aljabri et al. [ | mA, hyp | 62 | 30–45 mg Pio versus isophane insulin | 16 weeks | −44% | −8/−5 |
|
| ||||||
| Yanagawa et al. [ | mA, hyp | 40 | Pio versus Met or glibenclamide | 12 weeks | −45%a | NA |
|
| ||||||
| Hanefeld et al. [ | mA, hyp | 639 | 15–45 mg Pio versus 850–2550 mg metformin | 12 months | −15%a | NA |
|
| ||||||
| Schernthaner et al. [ | hyp | 1199 | 15–45 mg Pio versus 850–2550 mg metformin | 12 months | −19%a | NA |
|
| ||||||
| Matthews et al. [ | hyp | 630 | 15–45 mg Pio versus 80–320 mg glibenclamide | 12 months | −10%a | NA |
|
| ||||||
| Agarwal et al. [ | MA, hyp | 44 | Pio versus Glip | 4 months | −7% | +3.7/+2.2 |
|
| ||||||
| Lebovitz et al. [ | mA, hyp | 493 | 4 or 8 mg Rosi versus plb | 26 weeks | 4 mg group: −14% 8 mg group: −22%a | NA |
|
| ||||||
| Sarafidis et al. [ | hyp, mA | 20 | 4 mg Rosi | 6 months | −35%a | −5.4a/−4.1a |
|
| ||||||
| Pistrosch et al. [ | mA, hyp | 19 | non-mA patients: Rosi versus Nat, mA patients: Rosi versus plb | 12 weeks | non-mA patients: +18%b, mA patients: −66%a,b, | NA |
aSignificant changes from baseline levels or other groups;
bchange versus the group compared;
cmean change for systolic BP versus baseline in patients treated with the TZD.
DM, diabetes mellitus; hyp, hypertension; mA, microalbuminuria; MA, macroalbuminuria; Glip, glipizide; Nat, nateglinide; plb, placebo; Pio, pioglitazone; Vog, voglibose; UAE, urine albumin excretion; NA, changes in blood pressure levels not applicable.