BACKGROUND: Herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) oncoprotein K1 is linked to lymphoproliferation and suppression of apoptosis mediated by the Fas death receptor. Expression of K1 in transgenic mice induces accumulation of lymphoid tissue cells and lymphoma. METHODS: To examine how K1 and Fas interact to suppress apoptosis, K1-Fas binding was studied in human embryonic kidney (HEK) and lymphoma (BJAB) cells that expressed wild-type K1 or a K1 Ig domain deletion mutant and were treated with Fas ligand (FasL) or an agonistic Fas antibody, using immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis. Cleavage of caspase-3 and apoptosis was compared in liver samples from mice that were transfected with empty vector vs with plasmids expressing wild-type K1 or a K1 Ig deletion mutant and treated with agonistic Fas antibody for 7 hours. These studies used immunohistochemical staining and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling assay. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis of transfected HEK and BJAB cells revealed that wild-type K1 but not Ig-deleted K1 binds to Fas and prevents Fas activation by FasL or by an agonistic Fas antibody. More mice that were transfected with wild-type K1 (7 of 10) than mice transfected with empty vector (3 of 13) or the K1 Ig deletion mutant (0 of 6) survived treatment with the agonistic Fas antibody. Compared with vector-transfected mice, livers of wild-type K1-transfected mice contained fewer cells in which caspase-3 was cleaved (87.6% vs 58.0%, difference = 29.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 19.2% to 40.0%; P = .003) and fewer apoptotic cells (83.7% vs 34.2%, difference = 49.5%, 95% CI = 39.8% to 59.2%; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: K1 blocks Fas signaling by directly binding to Fas through the Ig-like domain of K1 and preventing binding of FasL. The relative resistance of cancer cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis may be due to the inhibition of Fas by Ig domain-containing proteins.
BACKGROUND:Herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) oncoprotein K1 is linked to lymphoproliferation and suppression of apoptosis mediated by the Fas death receptor. Expression of K1 in transgenic mice induces accumulation of lymphoid tissue cells and lymphoma. METHODS: To examine how K1 and Fas interact to suppress apoptosis, K1-Fas binding was studied in humanembryonic kidney (HEK) and lymphoma (BJAB) cells that expressed wild-type K1 or a K1 Ig domain deletion mutant and were treated with Fas ligand (FasL) or an agonistic Fas antibody, using immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis. Cleavage of caspase-3 and apoptosis was compared in liver samples from mice that were transfected with empty vector vs with plasmids expressing wild-type K1 or a K1 Ig deletion mutant and treated with agonistic Fas antibody for 7 hours. These studies used immunohistochemical staining and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling assay. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis of transfected HEK and BJAB cells revealed that wild-type K1 but not Ig-deleted K1 binds to Fas and prevents Fas activation by FasL or by an agonistic Fas antibody. More mice that were transfected with wild-type K1 (7 of 10) than mice transfected with empty vector (3 of 13) or the K1 Ig deletion mutant (0 of 6) survived treatment with the agonistic Fas antibody. Compared with vector-transfected mice, livers of wild-type K1-transfected mice contained fewer cells in which caspase-3 was cleaved (87.6% vs 58.0%, difference = 29.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 19.2% to 40.0%; P = .003) and fewer apoptotic cells (83.7% vs 34.2%, difference = 49.5%, 95% CI = 39.8% to 59.2%; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: K1 blocks Fas signaling by directly binding to Fas through the Ig-like domain of K1 and preventing binding of FasL. The relative resistance of cancer cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis may be due to the inhibition of Fas by Ig domain-containing proteins.
Authors: N Fouchard; V Lacoste; P Couppie; M Develoux; P Mauclere; P Michel; V Herve; R Pradinaud; G Bestetti; M Huerre; F Tekaia; G de Thé; A Gessain Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2000-01-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: R M Siegel; J K Frederiksen; D A Zacharias; F K Chan; M Johnson; D Lynch; R Y Tsien; M J Lenardo Journal: Science Date: 2000-06-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: M Paulose-Murphy; N K Ha; C Xiang; Y Chen; L Gillim; R Yarchoan; P Meltzer; M Bittner; J Trent; S Zeichner Journal: J Virol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: K Connolly; Y H Cho; R Duan; J Fikes; T Gregorio; D W LaFleur; Z Okoye; T W Salcedo; G Santiago; S Ullrich; P Wei; K Windle; E Wong; X T Yao; Y Q Zhang; G Zheng; P A Moore Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 4.030