PURPOSE: There is evidence that genetic variation in the prostaglandin pathway affects cancer susceptibility and progression. Conflicting data from several studies exist for the association of PTGS2 (cyclooxygenase 2) polymorphisms with breast cancer risk. We investigated associations between common germ-line variations in seven genes in the prostaglandin pathway and breast cancer susceptibility and survival among women with invasive breast cancer in the SEARCH study. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: DNA samples from 9,030 cases and controls were genotyped for 64 single nucleotide polymorphisms tagging known common variants (minor allele frequency > 0.05) in PTGS1, PTGS2, TBXAS1, PTGIS, PTGES, PTGDS, and PGDS with a two-stage case-control study design. RESULTS: Four tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms showed modest association with breast cancer susceptibility. All four fit a recessive genetic model. Minor allele homozygotes for PTGISrs5602 [odds ratio (OR), 1.15; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.04-1.27; P = 0.005], PTGISrs8183919 (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.41; P = 0.006), and TBXASrs41727 (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.22-2.73; P = 0.003) are associated with an increased risk compared with common allele carriers. For PTGISrs44627 minor allele homozygotes (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.5-0.86; P = 0.002), a protective effect was observed. CONCLUSION: Specific PTGIS and TBXAS1 variants may affect breast cancer susceptibility, but common variants in PTGS1, PTGS2, PTGES, PTGDS, and PGDS have no major role in breast cancer susceptibility. None of the variants in the seven genes studied appear to affect survival. Further larger studies correlating clinical and genotypic data are required to establish if the clinical utility of prostaglandin-targeted therapies, as chemoprevention agents, is influenced by an individual's profile of genetic variants in key prostaglandin pathway genes.
PURPOSE: There is evidence that genetic variation in the prostaglandin pathway affects cancer susceptibility and progression. Conflicting data from several studies exist for the association of PTGS2 (cyclooxygenase 2) polymorphisms with breast cancer risk. We investigated associations between common germ-line variations in seven genes in the prostaglandin pathway and breast cancer susceptibility and survival among women with invasive breast cancer in the SEARCH study. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: DNA samples from 9,030 cases and controls were genotyped for 64 single nucleotide polymorphisms tagging known common variants (minor allele frequency > 0.05) in PTGS1, PTGS2, TBXAS1, PTGIS, PTGES, PTGDS, and PGDS with a two-stage case-control study design. RESULTS: Four tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms showed modest association with breast cancer susceptibility. All four fit a recessive genetic model. Minor allele homozygotes for PTGISrs5602 [odds ratio (OR), 1.15; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.04-1.27; P = 0.005], PTGISrs8183919 (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.41; P = 0.006), and TBXASrs41727 (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.22-2.73; P = 0.003) are associated with an increased risk compared with common allele carriers. For PTGISrs44627 minor allele homozygotes (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.5-0.86; P = 0.002), a protective effect was observed. CONCLUSION: Specific PTGIS and TBXAS1 variants may affect breast cancer susceptibility, but common variants in PTGS1, PTGS2, PTGES, PTGDS, and PGDS have no major role in breast cancer susceptibility. None of the variants in the seven genes studied appear to affect survival. Further larger studies correlating clinical and genotypic data are required to establish if the clinical utility of prostaglandin-targeted therapies, as chemoprevention agents, is influenced by an individual's profile of genetic variants in key prostaglandin pathway genes.
Authors: Theodore M Brasky; Matthew R Bonner; Kirsten B Moysich; Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Catalin Marian; Christine B Ambrosone; Jing Nie; Meng Hua Tao; Stephen B Edge; Maurizio Trevisan; Peter G Shields; Jo L Freudenheim Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Chung-Ying K Chen; Elizabeth M Poole; Cornelia M Ulrich; Richard J Kulmacz; Lee-Ho Wang Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Marina Korotkova; Nina A Daha; Maria Seddighzadeh; Bo Ding; Anca I Catrina; Staffan Lindblad; Tom W J Huizinga; Rene E M Toes; Lars Alfredsson; Lars Klareskog; Per-Johan Jakobsson; Leonid Padyukov Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2011-03-30 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Avonne E Connor; Richard N Baumgartner; Kathy B Baumgartner; Christina M Pinkston; Stephanie D Boone; Esther M John; Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Lisa M Hines; Anna R Giuliano; Roger K Wolff; Martha L Slattery Journal: Mol Carcinog Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 4.784
Authors: Diogo N Piranda; Juliana S Festa-Vasconcellos; Laura M Amaral; Anke Bergmann; Rosane Vianna-Jorge Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Tricia M Wright; Suzanne E Wardell; Jeff S Jasper; James P Stice; Rachid Safi; Erik R Nelson; Donald P McDonnell Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 5.852