BACKGROUND: Aging is associated with a loss of muscle mass and increased body fat. The effects of diet-induced weight loss on muscle mass in older adults are not clear. PURPOSE: This study examined the effects of diet-induced weight loss, alone and in combination with moderate aerobic exercise, on skeletal muscle mass in older adults. METHODS: Twenty-nine overweight to obese (body mass index = 31.8 +/- 3.3 kg/m(2)) older (67.2 +/- 4.2 years) men (n = 13) and women (n = 16) completed a 4-month intervention consisting of diet-induced weight loss alone (WL; n = 11) or with exercise (WL/EX; n = 18). The WL intervention consisted of a low-fat, 500-1,000 kcal/d caloric restriction. The WL/EX intervention included the WL intervention with the addition of aerobic exercise, moderate-intensity walking, three to five times per week for 35-45 minutes per session. Whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, thigh computed tomography (CT), and percutaneous muscle biopsy were performed to assess changes in skeletal muscle mass at the whole-body, regional, and cellular level, respectively. RESULTS: Mixed analysis of variance demonstrated that both groups had similar decreases in bodyweight (WL, -9.2% +/- 1.0%; WL/EX, -9.1% +/- 1.0%) and whole-body fat mass (WL, -16.5%, WL/EX, -20.7%). However, whole-body fat-free mass decreased significantly (p < .05) in WL (-4.3% +/- 1.2%) but not in WL/EX (-1.1% +/- 1.0%). Thigh muscle cross-sectional area by CT decreased in both groups (WL, -5.2% +/- 1.1%; WL/EX, -3.0% +/- 1.0%) and was not statistically different between groups. Type I muscle fiber area decreased in WL (-19.2% +/- 7.9%, p = .01) but remained unchanged in WL/EX (3.4% +/- 7.5%). Similar patterns were observed in type II fibers (WL, -16.6% +/- 4.0%; WL/EX, -0.2% +/- 6.5%). CONCLUSION: Diet-induced weight loss significantly decreased muscle mass in older adults. However, the addition of moderate aerobic exercise to intentional weight loss attenuated the loss of muscle mass.
BACKGROUND: Aging is associated with a loss of muscle mass and increased body fat. The effects of diet-induced weight loss on muscle mass in older adults are not clear. PURPOSE: This study examined the effects of diet-induced weight loss, alone and in combination with moderate aerobic exercise, on skeletal muscle mass in older adults. METHODS: Twenty-nine overweight to obese (body mass index = 31.8 +/- 3.3 kg/m(2)) older (67.2 +/- 4.2 years) men (n = 13) and women (n = 16) completed a 4-month intervention consisting of diet-induced weight loss alone (WL; n = 11) or with exercise (WL/EX; n = 18). The WL intervention consisted of a low-fat, 500-1,000 kcal/d caloric restriction. The WL/EX intervention included the WL intervention with the addition of aerobic exercise, moderate-intensity walking, three to five times per week for 35-45 minutes per session. Whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, thigh computed tomography (CT), and percutaneous muscle biopsy were performed to assess changes in skeletal muscle mass at the whole-body, regional, and cellular level, respectively. RESULTS: Mixed analysis of variance demonstrated that both groups had similar decreases in bodyweight (WL, -9.2% +/- 1.0%; WL/EX, -9.1% +/- 1.0%) and whole-body fat mass (WL, -16.5%, WL/EX, -20.7%). However, whole-body fat-free mass decreased significantly (p < .05) in WL (-4.3% +/- 1.2%) but not in WL/EX (-1.1% +/- 1.0%). Thigh muscle cross-sectional area by CT decreased in both groups (WL, -5.2% +/- 1.1%; WL/EX, -3.0% +/- 1.0%) and was not statistically different between groups. Type I muscle fiber area decreased in WL (-19.2% +/- 7.9%, p = .01) but remained unchanged in WL/EX (3.4% +/- 7.5%). Similar patterns were observed in type II fibers (WL, -16.6% +/- 4.0%; WL/EX, -0.2% +/- 6.5%). CONCLUSION: Diet-induced weight loss significantly decreased muscle mass in older adults. However, the addition of moderate aerobic exercise to intentional weight loss attenuated the loss of muscle mass.
Authors: R S Hikida; R S Staron; F C Hagerman; S Walsh; E Kaiser; S Shell; S Hervey Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Roger A Fielding; Nathan K LeBrasseur; Anthony Cuoco; Jonathan Bean; Kelly Mizer; Maria A Fiatarone Singh Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jun Sugawara; Motohiko Miyachi; Kerrie L Moreau; Frank A Dinenno; Christopher A DeSouza; Hirofumi Tanaka Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: David W Dunstan; Robin M Daly; Neville Owen; Damien Jolley; Maximilian De Courten; Jonathan Shaw; Paul Zimmet Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: John J Dubé; Francesca Amati; Maja Stefanovic-Racic; Frederico G S Toledo; Sarah E Sauers; Bret H Goodpaster Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Thomas W Buford; Stephen D Anton; Andrew R Judge; Emanuele Marzetti; Stephanie E Wohlgemuth; Christy S Carter; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Marco Pahor; Todd M Manini Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: K M Beavers; M M Gordon; L Easter; D P Beavers; K G Hairston; B J Nicklas; M Z Vitolins Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Todd M Manini; Thomas W Buford; Donovan J Lott; Krista Vandenborne; Michael J Daniels; Jeffrey D Knaggs; Hetain Patel; Marco Pahor; Michael G Perri; Stephen D Anton Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: E M P Backx; M Tieland; K J Borgonjen-van den Berg; P R Claessen; L J C van Loon; L C P G M de Groot Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Elizabeth Rodríguez-Bies; Sara Santa-Cruz Calvo; Angela Fontán-Lozano; José Peña Amaro; Francisco J Berral de la Rosa; Angel M Carrión; Plácido Navas; Guillermo López-Lluch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Adam J Santanasto; Nancy W Glynn; Mark A Newman; Christopher A Taylor; Maria Mori Brooks; Bret H Goodpaster; Anne B Newman Journal: J Obes Date: 2010-10-10