K M Beavers1, M M Gordon, L Easter, D P Beavers, K G Hairston, B J Nicklas, M Z Vitolins. 1. Kristen M. Beavers, PhD, MPH, RD, Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157 USA,p 1.336.713.3741, f 1.336.713.8826, kbeavers@wakehealth.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this pilot study was to begin to examine the effect of dietary protein source (soy protein versus non-soy protein) during weight loss on body composition, and cardiometabolic and functional decline risk factors in older, abdominally obese adults. DESIGN: Two-arm, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem NC 27157, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 25 older (68.4±5.5 years, 88% female), abdominally obese (BMI: 35.1±4.3 kg/m2; WC: 101.4±13.1 cm) men and women were randomized to participate in the study. INTERVENTION: A 12-week weight loss intervention, with participants randomized to consume soy protein-based meal replacements (S; n=12) or non-soy protein-based meal replacements (NS; n=12), in addition to prepared meals, and all participants targeted to receive an individualized caloric deficit of 500 kcal/day. MEASUREMENTS: Body weight and composition (assessed via DXA and CT), conventional biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk, and physical performance measures were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Additional endpoints of feasibility (accrual, participation, retention, compliance, and safety) are reported. RESULTS: A total of 24 participants (87% female) completed the study (96% retention) and lost an average of 7.8±3.0 kg over the 12-week period, with no difference seen between groups (p=0.83). Although nearly all measures of global and regional body composition were significantly reduced following the 12-week intervention, differences were not observed between groups. Among cardiometabolic risk factors and physical performance measures, only diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the NS group compared to the S group (66.7±2.7 mmHg vs 73.5±2.7 mmHg, respectively; p=0.04). Interestingly, in groups combined, despite significant reductions in body weight and lean mass, no significant changes in 400-meter walk time (+5.3±43.4 s), short physical performance battery score (+0.1±1.0), grip strength (-0.3±3.2 kg), or relative knee extensor strength (-0.0±0.0 N/m/cm3 thigh muscle volume) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Data presented here suggest that a 12-week weight loss intervention, which incorporates S and NS meal replacement products, is associated with clinically significant weight loss and improvements in several parameters of cardiometabolic risk and unchanged physical function and strength. RESULTS do not differ by protein source and suggest that soy protein is at least as good as other protein sources for weight loss during low-calorie dietary interventions in older adults.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this pilot study was to begin to examine the effect of dietary protein source (soy protein versus non-soy protein) during weight loss on body composition, and cardiometabolic and functional decline risk factors in older, abdominally obese adults. DESIGN: Two-arm, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem NC 27157, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 25 older (68.4±5.5 years, 88% female), abdominally obese (BMI: 35.1±4.3 kg/m2; WC: 101.4±13.1 cm) men and women were randomized to participate in the study. INTERVENTION: A 12-week weight loss intervention, with participants randomized to consume soy protein-based meal replacements (S; n=12) or non-soy protein-based meal replacements (NS; n=12), in addition to prepared meals, and all participants targeted to receive an individualized caloric deficit of 500 kcal/day. MEASUREMENTS: Body weight and composition (assessed via DXA and CT), conventional biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk, and physical performance measures were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Additional endpoints of feasibility (accrual, participation, retention, compliance, and safety) are reported. RESULTS: A total of 24 participants (87% female) completed the study (96% retention) and lost an average of 7.8±3.0 kg over the 12-week period, with no difference seen between groups (p=0.83). Although nearly all measures of global and regional body composition were significantly reduced following the 12-week intervention, differences were not observed between groups. Among cardiometabolic risk factors and physical performance measures, only diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the NS group compared to the S group (66.7±2.7 mmHg vs 73.5±2.7 mmHg, respectively; p=0.04). Interestingly, in groups combined, despite significant reductions in body weight and lean mass, no significant changes in 400-meter walk time (+5.3±43.4 s), short physical performance battery score (+0.1±1.0), grip strength (-0.3±3.2 kg), or relative knee extensor strength (-0.0±0.0 N/m/cm3 thigh muscle volume) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Data presented here suggest that a 12-week weight loss intervention, which incorporates S and NS meal replacement products, is associated with clinically significant weight loss and improvements in several parameters of cardiometabolic risk and unchanged physical function and strength. RESULTS do not differ by protein source and suggest that soy protein is at least as good as other protein sources for weight loss during low-calorie dietary interventions in older adults.
Authors: M-K Kim; K Tanaka; M-J Kim; T Matuso; T Endo; T Tomita; S Maeda; R Ajisaka Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2009-04-11 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: M Zamboni; G Mazzali; E Zoico; T B Harris; J B Meigs; V Di Francesco; F Fantin; L Bissoli; O Bosello Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Marjolein Visser; Bret H Goodpaster; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Anne B Newman; Michael Nevitt; Susan M Rubin; Eleanor M Simonsick; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Monica C Serra; Daniel P Beavers; Rebecca M Henderson; Jessica L Kelleher; Jessica R Kiel; Kristen M Beavers Journal: Ann Nutr Metab Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 3.374
Authors: Tan Zhang; Xin Feng; Juan Dong; Zherong Xu; Bo Feng; Karen M Haas; Peggy M Cawthon; Kristen M Beavers; Barbara Nicklas; Stephen Kritchevsky Journal: Geroscience Date: 2022-01-15 Impact factor: 7.581
Authors: Ryan M Miller; Daniel P Beavers; Peggy M Cawthon; Charlotte Crotts; Jason Fanning; James Gerosa; Katelyn A Greene; Katherine L Hsieh; Jessica Kiel; Erica Lawrence; Leon Lenchik; S Delanie Lynch; Beverly A Nesbit; Barbara J Nicklas; Ashley A Weaver; Kristen M Beavers Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Christopher D Coleman; Jessica R Kiel; Andrea H Mitola; Janice S Langford; Kevin N Davis; Linda M Arterburn Journal: Nutr J Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 3.271