Literature DB >> 19274549

Patients' views of follow-up after treatment for gynaecological cancer.

F M Kew1, K Galaal, H Manderville.   

Abstract

This project set out to quantify women's views of routine follow-up. Women attending for routine follow-up after gynaecological cancer completed a questionnaire. A total of 54% (48/89) reported increased anxiety prior to their appointment, and 10% (9/90) still felt more anxious afterwards. Most women (82/92, 89%) preferred to see a hospital doctor, and preferred this to a review by a specialist nurse or general practitioner (p<0.001). Women thought the examination was the most important part of the visit (p<0.0001). Women viewed the specialist nurse's role as listening to concerns and taking blood, rather than detecting recurrence (p<0.0001). Women ranked detection of recurrence as the most important reason for attending for follow-up (p<0.0001). Overall, women think that detection of recurrence is the primary rationale for routine follow-up. Their views need to be taken into consideration when considering changes in the provision of follow-up care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19274549     DOI: 10.1080/01443610802646801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  8 in total

1.  The course of anxiety, depression and unmet needs in survivors of diffuse large B cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma in the early survivorship period.

Authors:  Devesh Oberoi; Victoria White; John Seymour; H Miles Prince; Simon Harrison; Michael Jefford; Ingrid Winship; David Hill; Damien Bolton; Anne Kay; Jeremy Millar; Nicole Wong Doo; Graham Giles
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Follow-up of epithelial ovarian cancer: overdue for a major rethink.

Authors:  Paul Hoskins
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Care-seeking behavior of Japanese gynecological cancer survivors suffering from adverse effects.

Authors:  Sumiko Oshima; Kengo Kisa; Takayoshi Terashita; Hidenobu Kawabata; Masaji Maezawa
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  'We do need to keep some human touch'-Patient and clinician experiences of ovarian cancer follow-up and the potential for an electronic patient-reported outcome pathway: A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Fiona Kennedy; Leanne Shearsmith; Marie Holmes; Rosemary Peacock; Oana C Lindner; Molly Megson; Galina Velikova
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.328

5.  Gynaecological cancer follow-up: national survey of current practice in the UK.

Authors:  Simon Leeson; Nick Stuart; Yvonne Sylvestre; Liz Hall; Rhiannon Whitaker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Electronic patient-reported monitoring of symptoms during follow-up of ovarian cancer patients: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Fiona Kennedy; Leanne Shearsmith; Marie Holmes; Zoe Rogers; Rob Carter; Uschi Hofmann; Galina Velikova
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 7.  Patient-reported outcome measures for follow-up after gynaecological cancer treatment.

Authors:  Vivek Nama; Andy Nordin; Andrew Bryant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-11-18

8.  Gynecologic cancer survivor preferences for long-term surveillance.

Authors:  Matthew Schlumbrecht; Charlotte Sun; Marilyn Huang; Andrea Milbourne; Diane Bodurka
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.