Literature DB >> 19273701

Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab: overall and KRAS-specific results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 Trial.

Heather-Jane Au1, Christos S Karapetis, Chris J O'Callaghan, Dongsheng Tu, Malcolm J Moore, John R Zalcberg, Hagen Kennecke, Jeremy D Shapiro, Sheryl Koski, Nick Pavlakis, Danielle Charpentier, David Wyld, Michael Jefford, Gregory J Knight, Nadine M Magoski, Michael D Brundage, Derek J Jonker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 demonstrated the antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab improves overall and progression-free survival in patients with advanced, chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly in patients with wild-type KRAS tumors. This article reports the health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) outcomes from CO.17. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 572) with pretreated EGFR-detectable advanced CRC were randomly assigned to cetuximab and best supportive care (BSC) or to BSC alone. HRQL primary end points assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 were physical function (PF) and global health status (GHS); mean changes from baseline to 8 and 16 weeks were assessed. Post hoc analysis by KRAS mutation status was performed.
RESULTS: Questionnaire compliance was 94% at baseline, but it declined differentially (67% v 47% for cetuximab v BSC at 16 weeks). PF change scores were -3.9 for cetuximab and -8.6 for BSC (P = .046) at 8 weeks and were -5.9 and -12.5 for cetuximab and BSC, respectively, (P = .027) at 16 weeks. GHS change scores were -0.5 and -7.1 (P = .008) at 8 weeks and were -3.6 and -15.2 (P = .008) at 16 weeks for cetuximab and BSC, respectively. In patients who had tumors with wild-type KRAS status, cetuximab resulted in less PF deterioration at 8 weeks (-0.7 v -7.2; P = .11) and 16 weeks (-3.4 v -13.8; P = .008) compared with BSC. Patients with wild-type status who received cetuximab experienced improved GHS at 8 weeks, whereas patients who received BSC alone deteriorated (3.2 v -7.7; P = .002). Cetuximab preserved GHS at 16 weeks (-0.2 v -18.1; P < .001). No significant differences were noted between study arms for patients with mutated KRAS tumors.
CONCLUSION: Cetuximab offers important HRQL and survival benefits for pretreated patients with advanced, wild-type KRAS CRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19273701     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  44 in total

Review 1.  Review of systemic therapies for locally advanced and metastatic rectal cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Yaffee; Arsen Osipov; Carlyn Tan; Richard Tuli; Andrew Hendifar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Decision making and quality of life in the treatment of cancer: a review.

Authors:  S Yousuf Zafar; Stewart C Alexander; Kevin P Weinfurt; Kevin A Schulman; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Identification of clinically relevant molecular subtypes in colorectal cancer: the dawning of a new era.

Authors:  Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-04-09

Review 4.  Management of locally advanced and metastatic colon cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Peter C Kurniali; Borys Hrinczenko; Anas Al-Janadi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Quality of life in colon cancer patients with skin side effects: preliminary results from a monocentric cross sectional study.

Authors:  Federica Andreis; Anna Rizzi; Paola Mosconi; Claudia Braun; Luigina Rota; Fausto Meriggi; Maria Mazzocchi; Alberto Zaniboni
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Development of a knowledge assessment tool for dermatotoxicity caused by inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Dimitrios Konstantinos Papageorgiou; Theocharis Konstantinidis; Theocharis Konsatntinidis; Nektaria Skandalaki; Anna Papadouri; Theodora Pappa; Stavroula Poulopoulou
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Hypertension as a predictor of advanced colorectal cancer outcome and cetuximab treatment response.

Authors:  S Sud; C O'Callaghan; C Jonker; C Karapetis; T Price; N Tebbutt; J Shapiro; G Van Hazel; N Pavlakis; P Gibbs; M Jeffrey; L Siu; S Gill; R Wong; D Jonker; D Tu; R Goodwin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 8.  Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in colorectal cancer treatment: what's new?

Authors:  M Ponz-Sarvisé; J Rodríguez; A Viudez; A Chopitea; A Calvo; J García-Foncillas; I Gil-Bazo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  A phase II study of S-1 plus irinotecan and oxaliplatin in heavily-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sun Young Kim; Yong Sang Hong; Byung Chang Kim; Ji Won Park; Hyo Seong Choi; Seung-Yong Jeong; Dae Yong Kim; Chang Won Hong; Dae Kyung Sohn; Kyung Hae Jung
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Prognostic and predictive value of TOPK stratified by KRAS and BRAF gene alterations in sporadic, hereditary and metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  I Zlobec; F Molinari; M Kovac; M P Bihl; H J Altermatt; J Diebold; H Frick; M Germer; M Horcic; M Montani; G Singer; H Yurtsever; A Zettl; L Terracciano; L Mazzucchelli; P Saletti; M Frattini; K Heinimann; A Lugli
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.