BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gemcitabine (2,2-difluorodeoxycytidine [dFdC]) can be administered in a standard 30-minute infusion or in a fixed-dose-rate (FDR) infusion to maximize the rate of accumulation of triphosphate, its major intracellular metabolite. The standard 30-minute infusion requires dose adjustment in patients with organ dysfunction, especially in patients with elevated baseline serum bilirubin levels. On the other hand, the FDR infusion is burdened by increased haematological toxicity. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of dFdC and its metabolite difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) in patients with normal and impaired hepatic function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, patients with pancreatic or biliary tract carcinoma and normal or impaired hepatic function tests were considered eligible for recruitment. Patients were recruited according to the following criteria: (i) serum bilirubin <1.6 mg/dL and AST and ALT <2 times the upper the limit of normal (ULN) [cohort I]; and (ii) serum bilirubin >1.6 mg/dL and/or AST/ALT >2 times the ULN (cohort II). An FDR infusion of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was administered on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. The pharmacokinetic analysis of gemcitabine and dFdU was performed with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay in cycles 1 and 2. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled, four in cohort I and nine in cohort II. All patients were assessable for toxicity and pharmacokinetic analysis. The grade and rate of toxicities were similar in both groups, and patients with elevation of bilirubin and/or transaminases did not require dose reduction of gemcitabine. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a reduction of the experimental area under the plasma concentration-time curve for gemcitabine and dFdU in patients with hepatic dysfunction when compared with patients with normal hepatic function. All other pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in the two cohorts. No statistical difference was demonstrated for all parameters evaluated between cycle 1 and cycle 2 in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 can be administered as an FDR infusion in patients with altered hepatic function without causing additional toxicity compared with patients with normal hepatic function.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Gemcitabine (2,2-difluorodeoxycytidine [dFdC]) can be administered in a standard 30-minute infusion or in a fixed-dose-rate (FDR) infusion to maximize the rate of accumulation of triphosphate, its major intracellular metabolite. The standard 30-minute infusion requires dose adjustment in patients with organ dysfunction, especially in patients with elevated baseline serum bilirubin levels. On the other hand, the FDR infusion is burdened by increased haematological toxicity. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of dFdC and its metabolite difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) in patients with normal and impaired hepatic function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, patients with pancreatic or biliary tract carcinoma and normal or impaired hepatic function tests were considered eligible for recruitment. Patients were recruited according to the following criteria: (i) serum bilirubin <1.6 mg/dL and AST and ALT <2 times the upper the limit of normal (ULN) [cohort I]; and (ii) serum bilirubin >1.6 mg/dL and/or AST/ALT >2 times the ULN (cohort II). An FDR infusion of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was administered on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. The pharmacokinetic analysis of gemcitabine and dFdU was performed with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay in cycles 1 and 2. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled, four in cohort I and nine in cohort II. All patients were assessable for toxicity and pharmacokinetic analysis. The grade and rate of toxicities were similar in both groups, and patients with elevation of bilirubin and/or transaminases did not require dose reduction of gemcitabine. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a reduction of the experimental area under the plasma concentration-time curve for gemcitabine and dFdU in patients with hepatic dysfunction when compared with patients with normal hepatic function. All other pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in the two cohorts. No statistical difference was demonstrated for all parameters evaluated between cycle 1 and cycle 2 in the two groups. CONCLUSION:Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 can be administered as an FDR infusion in patients with altered hepatic function without causing additional toxicity compared with patients with normal hepatic function.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A P Venook; M J Egorin; G L Rosner; D Hollis; S Mani; M Hawkins; J Byrd; R Hohl; D Budman; N J Meropol; M J Ratain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R A Soo; L Z Wang; L S Tham; W P Yong; M Boyer; H L Lim; H S Lee; M Millward; S Liang; P Beale; S C Lee; B C Goh Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2006-05-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Alain Gelibter; Paola Malaguti; Serena Di Cosimo; Emilio Bria; Enzo Maria Ruggeri; Paolo Carlini; Fabio Carboni; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Mario Pellicciotta; Diana Giannarelli; Edmondo Terzoli; Francesco Cognetti; Michele Milella Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Margaret Tempero; William Plunkett; Veronique Ruiz Van Haperen; John Hainsworth; Howard Hochster; Renato Lenzi; James Abbruzzese Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-07-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Peter Grimison; Peter Galettis; Susan Manners; Maria Jelinek; Ekkaphon Metharom; Paul L de Souza; Winston Liauw; Matthew J Links Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J L Abbruzzese; R Grunewald; E A Weeks; D Gravel; T Adams; B Nowak; S Mineishi; P Tarassoff; W Satterlee; M N Raber Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1991-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ronald Stoller; John C Schmitz; Fei Ding; Shannon Puhalla; Chandra P Belani; Leonard Appleman; Yan Lin; Yixing Jiang; Salah Almokadem; Daniel Petro; Julianne Holleran; Brian F Kiesel; R Ken Czambel; Benedito A Carneiro; Emmanuel Kontopodis; Pamela A Hershberger; Madani Rachid; Alice Chen; Edward Chu; Jan H Beumer Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Daniel Kozo; Matt W Ross; Justin Jarrah; Michael Barrett; Rebecca L Harney; Jodi B Courtney; Irina Baburina; Julianne L Holleran; Jan H Beumer; Godefridus J Peters; Richard J Honeywell; Salvatore J Salamone Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 3.681