Literature DB >> 19271785

Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine at fixed-dose rate infusion in patients with normal and impaired hepatic function.

Alessandra Felici1, Susanna Di Segni, Michele Milella, Simona Colantonio, Isabella Sperduti, Barbara Nuvoli, Michela Contestabile, Andrea Sacconi, Massimo Zaratti, Gennaro Citro, Francesco Cognetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gemcitabine (2,2-difluorodeoxycytidine [dFdC]) can be administered in a standard 30-minute infusion or in a fixed-dose-rate (FDR) infusion to maximize the rate of accumulation of triphosphate, its major intracellular metabolite. The standard 30-minute infusion requires dose adjustment in patients with organ dysfunction, especially in patients with elevated baseline serum bilirubin levels. On the other hand, the FDR infusion is burdened by increased haematological toxicity. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of dFdC and its metabolite difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) in patients with normal and impaired hepatic function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, patients with pancreatic or biliary tract carcinoma and normal or impaired hepatic function tests were considered eligible for recruitment. Patients were recruited according to the following criteria: (i) serum bilirubin <1.6 mg/dL and AST and ALT <2 times the upper the limit of normal (ULN) [cohort I]; and (ii) serum bilirubin >1.6 mg/dL and/or AST/ALT >2 times the ULN (cohort II). An FDR infusion of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was administered on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. The pharmacokinetic analysis of gemcitabine and dFdU was performed with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay in cycles 1 and 2.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled, four in cohort I and nine in cohort II. All patients were assessable for toxicity and pharmacokinetic analysis. The grade and rate of toxicities were similar in both groups, and patients with elevation of bilirubin and/or transaminases did not require dose reduction of gemcitabine. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a reduction of the experimental area under the plasma concentration-time curve for gemcitabine and dFdU in patients with hepatic dysfunction when compared with patients with normal hepatic function. All other pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in the two cohorts. No statistical difference was demonstrated for all parameters evaluated between cycle 1 and cycle 2 in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 can be administered as an FDR infusion in patients with altered hepatic function without causing additional toxicity compared with patients with normal hepatic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271785     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200948020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  21 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of gemcitabine in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9565.

Authors:  A P Venook; M J Egorin; G L Rosner; D Hollis; S Mani; M Hawkins; J Byrd; R Hohl; D Budman; N J Meropol; M J Ratain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A phase I trial of weekly gemcitabine administered as a prolonged infusion in patients with pancreatic cancer and other solid tumors.

Authors:  R Brand; M Capadano; M Tempero
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  A multicentre randomised phase II study of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion in patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R A Soo; L Z Wang; L S Tham; W P Yong; M Boyer; H L Lim; H S Lee; M Millward; S Liang; P Beale; S C Lee; B C Goh
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Gemcitabine: a promising new agent in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer.

Authors:  M J Moore; I F Tannock; D S Ernst; S Huan; N Murray
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Fixed dose-rate gemcitabine infusion as first-line treatment for advanced-stage carcinoma of the pancreas and biliary tree.

Authors:  Alain Gelibter; Paola Malaguti; Serena Di Cosimo; Emilio Bria; Enzo Maria Ruggeri; Paolo Carlini; Fabio Carboni; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Mario Pellicciotta; Diana Giannarelli; Edmondo Terzoli; Francesco Cognetti; Michele Milella
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret Tempero; William Plunkett; Veronique Ruiz Van Haperen; John Hainsworth; Howard Hochster; Renato Lenzi; James Abbruzzese
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Randomized crossover study evaluating the effect of gemcitabine infusion dose rate: evidence of auto-induction of gemcitabine accumulation.

Authors:  Peter Grimison; Peter Galettis; Susan Manners; Maria Jelinek; Ekkaphon Metharom; Paul L de Souza; Winston Liauw; Matthew J Links
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine.

Authors:  J L Abbruzzese; R Grunewald; E A Weeks; D Gravel; T Adams; B Nowak; S Mineishi; P Tarassoff; W Satterlee; M N Raber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Saturation of 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate accumulation by mononuclear cells during a phase I trial of gemcitabine.

Authors:  R Grunewald; J L Abbruzzese; P Tarassoff; W Plunkett
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  6 in total

1.  Phase I study of veliparib in combination with gemcitabine.

Authors:  Ronald Stoller; John C Schmitz; Fei Ding; Shannon Puhalla; Chandra P Belani; Leonard Appleman; Yan Lin; Yixing Jiang; Salah Almokadem; Daniel Petro; Julianne Holleran; Brian F Kiesel; R Ken Czambel; Benedito A Carneiro; Emmanuel Kontopodis; Pamela A Hershberger; Madani Rachid; Alice Chen; Edward Chu; Jan H Beumer
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.

Authors:  A A Joy; M Ghosh; R Fernandes; M J Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Rapid Homogeneous Immunoassay to Quantify Gemcitabine in Plasma for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Authors:  Daniel Kozo; Matt W Ross; Justin Jarrah; Michael Barrett; Rebecca L Harney; Jodi B Courtney; Irina Baburina; Julianne L Holleran; Jan H Beumer; Godefridus J Peters; Richard J Honeywell; Salvatore J Salamone
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Severe acute toxicity following gemcitabine administration: A report of four cases with cytidine deaminase polymorphisms evaluation.

Authors:  Beata Hryciuk; Bartosz Szymanowski; Anna Romanowska; Ewa Salt; Bartosz Wasąg; Bartłomiej Grala; Jacek Jassem; Renata Duchnowska
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Metastatic pancreatic cancer: Is there a light at the end of the tunnel?

Authors:  Vanja Vaccaro; Isabella Sperduti; Sabrina Vari; Emilio Bria; Davide Melisi; Carlo Garufi; Carmen Nuzzo; Aldo Scarpa; Giampaolo Tortora; Francesco Cognetti; Michele Reni; Michele Milella
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction.

Authors:  Takashi Shibata; Tomoki Ebata; Ken-ichi Fujita; Tomoya Shimokata; Osamu Maeda; Ayako Mitsuma; Yasutsuna Sasaki; Masato Nagino; Yuichi Ando
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 6.716

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.