Literature DB >> 19271242

Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses.

Felix B Rosumek1, Fernando A O Silveira, Frederico de S Neves, Newton P de U Barbosa, Livia Diniz, Yumi Oki, Flavia Pezzini, G Wilson Fernandes, Tatiana Cornelissen.   

Abstract

We reviewed the evidence on the role of ants as plant biotic defenses, by conducting meta-analyses for the effects of experimental removal of ants on plant herbivory and fitness with data pooled from 81 studies. Effects reviewed were plant herbivory, herbivore abundance, hemipteran abundance, predator abundance, plant biomass and reproduction in studies where ants were experimentally removed (n = 273 independent comparisons). Ant removal exhibited strong effects on herbivory rates, as plants without ants suffered almost twice as much damage and exhibited 50% more herbivores than plants with ants. Ants also influenced several parameters of plant fitness, as plants without ants suffered a reduction in biomass (-23.7%), leaf production (-51.8%), and reproduction (-24.3%). Effects were much stronger in tropical regions compared to temperate ones. Tropical plants suffered almost threefold higher herbivore damage than plants from temperate regions and exhibited three times more herbivores. Ant removal in tropical plants resulted in a decrease in plant fitness of about 59%, whereas in temperate plants this reduction was not statistically significant. Ant removal effects were also more important in obligate ant-plants (=myrmecophytes) compared to plants exhibiting facultative relationships with hemiptera or those plants with extrafloral nectaries and food bodies. When only tropical plants were considered and the strength of the association between ants and plants taken into account, plants with obligate association with ants exhibited almost four times higher herbivory compared to plants with facultative associations with ants, but similar reductions in plant reproduction. The removal of a single ant species increased plant herbivory by almost three times compared to the removal of several ant species. Altogether, these results suggest that ants do act as plant biotic defenses, but the effects of their presence are more pronounced in tropical systems, especially in myrmecophytic plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271242     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1309-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  21 in total

1.  Why are there so many species of herbivorous insects in tropical rainforests?

Authors:  Vojtech Novotny; Pavel Drozd; Scott E Miller; Miroslav Kulfan; Milan Janda; Yves Basset; George D Weiblen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions.

Authors:  Martin Heil
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Terrestrial trophic cascades: how much do they trickle?

Authors:  J Halaj; D H Wise
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  On benefits of indirect defence: short- and long-term studies of antiherbivore protection via mutualistic ants.

Authors:  Martin Heil; Brigitte Fiala; Ulrich Maschwitz; K Eduard Linsenmair
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The fitness consequences of bearing domatia and having the right ant partner: experiments with protective and non-protective ants in a semi-myrmecophyte.

Authors:  Laurence Gaume; Merry Zacharias; Vladimir Grosbois; Renee M Borges
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Assessing the quality of different ant species as partners of a myrmecophilous butterfly.

Authors:  Ann M Fraser; Annkristin H Axén; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The devil to pay: a cost of mutualism with Myrmelachista schumanni ants in 'devil's gardens' is increased herbivory on Duroia hirsuta trees.

Authors:  Megan E Frederickson; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Ant-plant-herbivore interactions in the neotropical cerrado savanna.

Authors:  Paulo S Oliveira; André V L Freitas
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-11-13

9.  Conditional outcomes in a neotropical treehopper-ant association: temporal and species-specific variation in ant protection and homopteran fecundity.

Authors:  K Del-Claro; P S Oliveira
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew.

Authors:  Nico Blüthgen; Manfred Verhaagh; William Goitía; Klaus Jaffé; Wilfried Morawetz; Wilhelm Barthlott
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  54 in total

1.  Do extrafloral nectar resources, species abundances, and body sizes contribute to the structure of ant-plant mutualistic networks?

Authors:  Scott A Chamberlain; Jeffrey R Kilpatrick; J Nathaniel Holland
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Plant-ants feed their host plant, but above all a fungal symbiont to recycle nitrogen.

Authors:  Emmanuel Defossez; Champlain Djiéto-Lordon; Doyle McKey; Marc-André Selosse; Rumsaïs Blatrix
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Differential ant exclusion from canopies shows contrasting top-down effects on community structure.

Authors:  Laia Mestre; J Piñol; J A Barrientos; X Espadaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  You get what you pay for: reward-specific trade-offs among direct and ant-mediated defences in plants.

Authors:  Julia Koricheva; Gustavo Q Romero
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Phloem sugar flux and jasmonic acid-responsive cell wall invertase control extrafloral nectar secretion in Ricinus communis.

Authors:  Cynthia Millán-Cañongo; Domancar Orona-Tamayo; Martin Heil
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Response of a Predatory ant to Volatiles Emitted by Aphid- and Caterpillar-Infested Cucumber and Potato Plants.

Authors:  Mauro Schettino; Donato A Grasso; Berhane T Weldegergis; Cristina Castracani; Alessandra Mori; Marcel Dicke; Joop C Van Lenteren; Joop J A Van Loon
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  The demographic consequences of mutualism: ants increase host-plant fruit production but not population growth.

Authors:  Kevin R Ford; Joshua H Ness; Judith L Bronstein; William F Morris
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Evidence of indirect biotic resistance: native ants decrease invasive plant fitness by enhancing aphid infestation.

Authors:  Andrés M Devegili; María N Lescano; Ernesto Gianoli; Alejandro G Farji-Brener
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The effects of high-severity fires on the arboreal ant community of a Neotropical savanna.

Authors:  Thaynah F Rosa; Flávio Camarota; Lino A Zuanon; Richard Tito; Jonas B Maravalhas; Scott Powell; Heraldo L Vasconcelos
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  A phylogenetic perspective on the association between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and black yeasts (Ascomycota: Chaetothyriales).

Authors:  Marie Vasse; Hermann Voglmayr; Veronika Mayer; Cécile Gueidan; Maximilian Nepel; Leandro Moreno; Sybren de Hoog; Marc-André Selosse; Doyle McKey; Rumsaïs Blatrix
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.