Literature DB >> 19271089

Comparison between objective assessment and self-assessment of sexual maturation in children and adolescents.

Jenner C V Azevedo1, Lana M P Brasil, Taísa B M A Macedo, Lucia F C Pedrosa, Ricardo F Arrais.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the correlations between objective assessment and self-assessment of sexual maturation in the outpatient and school settings.
METHODS: Three hundred and nineteen individuals, 178 (96 boys and 82 girls) from an outpatient clinic and 141 (73 boys and 68 girls) from public schools (8.3-18.7 years), of whom 73 individuals (39 girls an d 34 boys) had a body mass index above the 85th percentile, according to 2000 CDC Growth Chart, were analyzed. All of them were examined sequentially and individually by two trained physicians after a written consent form was signed by parents or surrogates, and then submitted to self-assessment using pictures (Tanner stages). Kappa coefficients between examiners and the self-assessment were calculated based on the collected data. A p value <5%was established as statistically significant.
RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between correlations obtained from the outpatient clinic and schools, and both groups were combined for analysis. The correlations obtained by examiners were significantly higher than those from self-assessment, with a kappa coefficient (and confidence interval) of 0.75 (0.8-0.69) for breasts/genitals across examiners against 0.27 (0.34-0.20) and 0.29 (0.36-0.22) between the two examiners and the self-assessment (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the studied sample, self-assessment of the pubertal stage should not replace the objective assessment made by trained professionals. Improvement of the self-assessment method may validate its use in population-based studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271089     DOI: 10.2223/JPED.1875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)        ISSN: 0021-7557            Impact factor:   2.197


  7 in total

1.  Reliability of pubertal self assessment method: an Iranian study.

Authors:  Ali Rabbani; Shahab Noorian; Javad S Fallah; Arya Setoudeh; Fatemeh Sayarifard; Farzaneh Abbasi
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.364

2.  A network investigation on idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in china.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhao; Hongying Ye; Xiaolong Zhao; Zhaoyun Zhang; Shouyue Sun; Yiran Jiang; Min He; Cheng Xu; Renming Hu; Yiming Li
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.257

3.  Breast bud detection: a validation study in the Chilean growth obesity cohort study.

Authors:  Ana Pereira; María Luisa Garmendia; Daniela González; Juliana Kain; Verónica Mericq; Ricardo Uauy; Camila Corvalán
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  [Contribution of anthropometric characteristics to pubertal stage prediction in young male individuals].

Authors:  Radamés Maciel Vitor Medeiros; Ricardo Fernando Arrais; Jenner Chrystian Veríssimo de Azevedo; Jeferson Tafarel Pereira do Rêgo; Jason Azevedo de Medeiros; Ricardo Dias de Andrade; Paulo Moreira Silva Dantas
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2014-10-03

5.  Sexual maturation of HIV-infected and uninfected male children in Abakaliki, South-East, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chijioke Ogodo Ogeh; Maria-Lauretta Orji; Kenechukwu Kosisochukwu Iloh; Chijioke Joel Nweke; Blessed Uzochukwuamaka Ogeh; Ogochukwu Nneka Iloh; Ifeoma Josephine Emodi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 6.  Methodological and ethical aspects of the sexual maturation assessment in adolescents.

Authors:  Eliane Rodrigues de Faria; Sylvia do Carmo C Franceschini; Maria do Carmo G Peluzio; Luciana Ferreira da R Sant'Ana; Silvia Eloiza Priore
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2013-09

7.  Adolescent male genitalia dissatisfaction: a surgical perspective.

Authors:  Nicola Zampieri; Ilaria Dando; Francesco Saverio Camoglio
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.