Literature DB >> 19270190

Comparison of the biomechanical profile of the intact ulnar collateral ligament with the modified Jobe and the Docking reconstructed elbow: an in vitro study.

Michael G Ciccotti1, Sorin Siegler, John A Kuri, John H Thinnes, Daniel J Murphy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The modified Jobe and Docking techniques are commonly used to reconstruct the elbow's ulnar collateral ligament. HYPOTHESIS: Valgus laxity and kinematic coupling after these reconstructive procedures are similar to those of the native ulnar collateral ligament. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Testing was conducted on 10 pairs of cadaver elbows using a 4 degrees of freedom loading system. Subfailure valgus loads were applied to the native elbows at different flexion angles; motion and ligament elongation were measured. The elbows were then loaded to failure in valgus at 90 degrees of flexion. The reconstructive techniques were then applied and testing was repeated.
RESULTS: Only the resting length of the anterior portion of the ulnar collateral ligament anterior bundle remained isometric throughout range of motion. Valgus laxity was nearly equal for the native and reconstructed ligaments at flexion angles of 90 degrees or higher. However, both reconstructions provided less valgus stability than the native ulnar collateral ligament at low flexion angles. Kinematic coupling decreased with increased flexion for both native and reconstructed ligaments.
CONCLUSION: The modified Jobe and Docking techniques reconstruct restraint of the native ulnar collateral ligament to valgus laxity and kinematic coupling at 90 degrees of flexion and higher angles where peak valgus torque is experienced in the throwing elbow. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both reconstructions provide valgus stability comparable to that of the native ulnar collateral ligament at 90 degrees and higher, helping to explain their success in treating throwing athletes. Both reconstructions provide less valgus stability than the native ulnar collateral ligament at low flexion angles, suggesting that patients undergoing ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction should be cautioned against activities that provide valgus stress at low elbow flexion angles, such as side-arm throwing. This study suggests caution against overtightening the reconstructions at the common 30 degrees of flexion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19270190     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508331136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  14 in total

1.  Biomechanical differences of the anterior and posterior bands of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow.

Authors:  Timothy J Jackson; Shelby E Jarrell; Gregory J Adamson; Kyung Chil Chung; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair of the Elbow-Biomechanics, Indications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen J Torres; Orr Limpisvasti
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 3.  State of the Union on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in 2020: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Cort D Lawton; Joseph D Lamplot; Joshua I Wright-Chisem; Evan W James; Christopher L Camp; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

4.  Is Allograft Reconstruction of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow a Viable Option for Nonelite Athletes? Outcomes at a Mean of 8 Years.

Authors:  Justin C Kennon; Erick M Marigi; Chad E Songy; Chris Bernard; Shawn W O'Driscoll; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Christopher L Camp
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-10-16

Review 5.  The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review).

Authors:  Bart Van Trigt; Liset W Vliegen; Ton Ajr Leenen; DirkJan Hej Veeger
Journal:  Int Biomech       Date:  2021-12

6.  The Effects of Differences in the Morphologies of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament and Common Tendon of the Flexor-Pronator Muscles on Elbow Valgus Braking Function: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Masahiro Ikezu; Mutsuaki Edama; Takuma Inai; Kanta Matsuzawa; Fumiya Kaneko; Ryo Hirabayashi; Ikuo Kageyama
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball: Current Trends, Surgical Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher L Camp; Vishal Desai; Stan Conte; Christopher S Ahmad; Michael Ciccotti; Joshua S Dines; David W Altchek; John D'Angelo; Timothy B Griffith
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-08-14

8.  Medial Elbow Pain During the Return-to-Throwing Period After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Pitchers.

Authors:  Robert A Keller; Nathan E Marshall; Orr Limpisvasti; Anthony F DeGiacomo; Michael Banffy; Neal S ElAttrache
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-11-14

9.  The Middle and Distal Aspects of the Ulnar Footprint of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow Do Not Provide Significant Resistance to Valgus Stress: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Michael Fu; Kate Meyers; Christopher L Camp; David W Altchek; Struan H Coleman; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-02-11

10.  Biomechanical Evaluation of a Modified Internal Brace Construct for the Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries.

Authors:  Ekaterina Urch; Orr Limpisvasti; Neal S ElAttrache; Yasuo Itami; Michelle H McGarry; Christos D Photopoulos; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.