Literature DB >> 19269161

Is protein classification necessary? Toward alternative approaches to function annotation.

Donald Petrey1, Barry Honig.   

Abstract

The current nonredundant protein sequence database contains over seven million entries and the number of individual functional domains is significantly larger than this value. The vast quantity of data associated with these proteins poses enormous challenges to any attempt at function annotation. Classification of proteins into sequence and structural groups has been widely used as an approach to simplifying the problem. In this article we question such strategies. We describe how the multifunctionality and structural diversity of even closely related proteins confounds efforts to assign function on the basis of overall sequence or structural similarity. Rather, we suggest that strategies that avoid classification may offer a more robust approach to protein function annotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19269161      PMCID: PMC2745633          DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  38 in total

Review 1.  Plant glutaredoxins: still mysterious reducing systems.

Authors:  N Rouhier; E Gelhaye; J-P Jacquot
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  EFICAz: a comprehensive approach for accurate genome-scale enzyme function inference.

Authors:  Weidong Tian; Adrian K Arakaki; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Structural drift: a possible path to protein fold change.

Authors:  S Sri Krishna; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Evolution of protein fold in the presence of functional constraints.

Authors:  Antonina Andreeva; Alexey G Murzin
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 5.  Protein structure comparison: implications for the nature of 'fold space', and structure and function prediction.

Authors:  Rachel Kolodny; Donald Petrey; Barry Honig
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Evolution of new protein topologies through multistep gene rearrangements.

Authors:  Sergio G Peisajovich; Liat Rockah; Dan S Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Time for a change.

Authors:  Norman R Pace
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Exploring the conformational properties of the sequence space between two proteins with different folds: an experimental study.

Authors:  F J Blanco; I Angrand; L Serrano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Interconversion between two unrelated protein folds in the lymphotactin native state.

Authors:  Robbyn L Tuinstra; Francis C Peterson; Snjezana Kutlesa; E Sonay Elgin; Michael A Kron; Brian F Volkman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A tale of two ferredoxins: sequence similarity and structural differences.

Authors:  S Sri Krishna; Ruslan I Sadreyev; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2006-04-09
View more
  26 in total

1.  Structural space of protein-protein interfaces is degenerate, close to complete, and highly connected.

Authors:  Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Protein domain assignment from the recurrence of locally similar structures.

Authors:  Chin-Hsien Tai; Vichetra Sam; Jean-Francois Gibrat; Jean Garnier; Peter J Munson; Byungkook Lee
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-12-22

3.  Structural relationships among proteins with different global topologies and their implications for function annotation strategies.

Authors:  Donald Petrey; Markus Fischer; Barry Honig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  FragBag, an accurate representation of protein structure, retrieves structural neighbors from the entire PDB quickly and accurately.

Authors:  Inbal Budowski-Tal; Yuval Nov; Rachel Kolodny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Protein interactions and ligand binding: from protein subfamilies to functional specificity.

Authors:  Antonio Rausell; David Juan; Florencio Pazos; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Maps of protein structure space reveal a fundamental relationship between protein structure and function.

Authors:  Margarita Osadchy; Rachel Kolodny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structural fragment clustering reveals novel structural and functional motifs in alpha-helical transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  Annalisa Marsico; Andreas Henschel; Christof Winter; Anne Tuukkanen; Boris Vassilev; Kerstin Scheubert; Michael Schroeder
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Alignment-free local structural search by writhe decomposition.

Authors:  Degui Zhi; Maxim Shatsky; Steven E Brenner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 9.  Issues in bioinformatics benchmarking: the case study of multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  Mohamed Radhouene Aniba; Olivier Poch; Julie D Thompson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  MeMotif: a database of linear motifs in alpha-helical transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  Annalisa Marsico; Kerstin Scheubert; Anne Tuukkanen; Andreas Henschel; Christof Winter; Rainer Winnenburg; Michael Schroeder
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.