Literature DB >> 19267553

Single-strand annealing, conservative homologous recombination, nonhomologous DNA end joining, and the cell cycle-dependent repair of DNA double-strand breaks induced by sparsely or densely ionizing radiation.

Marlis Frankenberg-Schwager1, Anja Gebauer, Cordula Koppe, Hartmut Wolf, Elke Pralle, Dieter Frankenberg.   

Abstract

The cell cycle-dependent relative contributions of error-prone single-strand annealing (SSA), error-free conservative homologous recombination (HR), and potentially error-prone nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) to repair simple (induced by 200 kV X rays) or complex (induced by (241)Am alpha particles) DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in Chinese hamster ovary cells are reported for the first time. Cells of the parental cell line AA8 and its derivatives UV41 (SSA-deficient), irs1SF (HR-deficient) and V3 (NHEJ-deficient) were synchronized in G(1) or in S phase, and survival responses after exposure to either type of radiation were measured. It is demonstrated for the first time that in G(1)-phase SSA is negligible for the repair of DSBs of various complexities. HR-deficient cells exposed to X rays or alpha particles in G(1) phase show enhanced radiosensitivity, but this does not necessarily mean that HR is important in G(1) phase. NHEJ appears to be the most important (if not the only) mechanism in G(1) phase acting efficiently on simple DSBs, but complex DSBs are a less preferred target. In contrast to X rays, NHEJ-deficient cells show no cell cycle-dependent variation in sensitivity to alpha particles. Surprisingly, when these cells are exposed to X rays in G(1) phase, they are even more sensitive compared to alpha particles. It is also shown for the first time that in S phase all three mechanisms play a role in the repair of simple and complex DSBs. A defect in SSA confers radiosensitivity to cells in S phase, suggesting that the error-prone SSA mechanism is important for the repair of specific simple and complex DSBs that are not a substrate for HR or NHEJ. The most important mechanism in S phase for the repair of simple and complex DSBs is HR. This is also emphasized by the finding that irs1SF cells, after complementation of their HR defect by human XRCC3 cDNA, show a greater radioresistance than parental cells, whereas resistance to mitomycin C is only partially restored. Complementation confers a greater resistance to alpha particles than X rays, suggesting an important role of HR, especially for the repair of complex DSBs. In S phase, NHEJ is more important than SSA for the repair of simple DSBs, but SSA is more important than NHEJ for the repair of complex DSBs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19267553     DOI: 10.1667/RR0784.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  18 in total

1.  Influence of homologous recombinational repair on cell survival and chromosomal aberration induction during the cell cycle in gamma-irradiated CHO cells.

Authors:  Paul F Wilson; John M Hinz; Salustra S Urbin; Peter B Nham; Larry H Thompson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-07-01

2.  Mechanism of radiosensitization by the Chk1/2 inhibitor AZD7762 involves abrogation of the G2 checkpoint and inhibition of homologous recombinational DNA repair.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Lili Zhao; Joshua D Parsels; Mary A Davis; Maria C Hassan; Sankari Arumugarajah; Linda Hylander-Gans; Deborah Morosini; Diane M Simeone; Christine E Canman; Daniel P Normolle; Sonya D Zabludoff; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Increased meiotic crossovers and reduced genome stability in absence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad16 (XPF).

Authors:  Tara L Mastro; Susan L Forsburg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Enhancing radiotherapy through a greater understanding of homologous recombination.

Authors:  Christopher A Barker; Simon N Powell
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.934

6.  Effects of radiation type and delivery mode on a radioresistant eukaryote Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; Ruth A Bryan; Jack Broitman; Stephen A Marino; Alfred Morgenstern; Christos Apostolidis; Ekaterina Dadachova
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based system for studying clustered DNA damages.

Authors:  Mario Moscariello; Betsy Sutherland
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 8.  Cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation: artificial neural networks inference from atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Masao S Sasaki; Akira Tachibana; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Targeting ATR in vivo using the novel inhibitor VE-822 results in selective sensitization of pancreatic tumors to radiation.

Authors:  E Fokas; R Prevo; J R Pollard; P M Reaper; P A Charlton; B Cornelissen; K A Vallis; E M Hammond; M M Olcina; W Gillies McKenna; R J Muschel; T B Brunner
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 8.469

Review 10.  The potential of mesenchymal stem cells in the management of radiation enteropathy.

Authors:  P-Y Chang; Y-Q Qu; J Wang; L-H Dong
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 8.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.