Literature DB >> 19266827

Jaw thrust as a predictor of insertion conditions for the proseal laryngeal mask airway.

Russell Townsend1, Joseph Brimacombe, Christian Keller, Volker Wenzel, Holger Herff.   

Abstract

We test the hypothesis that the response to jaw thrust is an effective predictor of insertion conditions for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (ProSeal LMA). One hundred and sixty patients (ASA grade 1-3, aged >18 yr) were studied. Five anesthetists blinded to the response to jaw thrust participated in the study, each performed >30 insertions. Induction of anesthesia was with propofol titrated to loss of lash reflex and apnea. A standard amount of jaw thrust was applied and any motor response noted by three observers. The ProSeal LMA was inserted using the standard digital technique. Insertion conditions were considered optimal if there was no motor or upper airway reflex response to insertion. There was no response to jaw thrust in 86% (137/160) of patients and insertion was optimal in 76% (121/160) of patients. A response to jaw thrust predicted suboptimal insertion conditions in 74% (17/23) and a lack of response predicted optimal insertion conditions in 84% (115/137). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 0.82, 0.95 and 0.44, respectively. We conclude thatjaw thrust is a reliable predictor of insertion conditions for the ProSeal LMA with the digital insertion technique after induction of anesthesia with propofol. We suggest that clinicians learn how to apply the correct amount of jaw thrust and perform this test routinely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19266827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Middle East J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0544-0440


  5 in total

1.  Supraglottic Airway Devices: the Search for the Best Insertion Technique or the Time to Change Our Point of View?

Authors:  Massimiliano Sorbello; Flavia Petrini
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  Randomized comparison of the i-gel™, the LMA Supreme™, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients.

Authors:  Sebastian G Russo; Stephan Cremer; Tamara Galli; Christoph Eich; Anselm Bräuer; Thomas A Crozier; Martin Bauer; Micha Strack
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Comparison of trapezius squeeze test and jaw thrust as clinical indicators for laryngeal mask airway insertion in spontaneously breathing children.

Authors:  K K Dinesh Kumar; Neerja Bhardwaj; Sandhya Yaddanapudi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

4.  Evaluation of the optimal cuff volume and cuff pressure of the revised laryngeal tube "LTS-D" in surgical patients.

Authors:  Marc Kriege; Christian Alflen; Johannes Eisel; Thomas Ott; Tim Piepho; Ruediger R Noppens
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Comparison of thiopentone with lidocaine spray vs propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion at tikur anbessa specialized hospital. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Engidawork Belete; Misrak W/Yahones; Zemedu Aweke; Getahun Dendir; Simeneh Mola; Derartu Neme; Getnet Melaku; Siraj Ahmed; Teshome Regasa; Brook Tesfaye
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.