Literature DB >> 19265718

Genetic testing for melanoma risk: a prospective cohort study of uptake and outcomes among Australian families.

Nadine A Kasparian1, Bettina Meiser, Phyllis N Butow, Judy M Simpson, Graham J Mann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to examine uptake and psychological, behavioral, and cognitive outcomes of genetic testing for melanoma risk among individuals with a known family-specific CDKN2A mutation.
METHODS: A total of 119 individuals were ascertained via a genetic epidemiological study and completed a series of mailed, self-administered questionnaires at multiple time points, including notification of genetic test availability, and 2 weeks and 12 months after receipt of genetic test results (for "test participants"), or 12 months after notification (for "decliners").
RESULTS: Since January 2005, 21% of participants (n = 25) have undergone genetic testing, with 75% of those who have received results identified as mutation carriers (n = 15). Factors associated with uptake of genetic counseling included perceived susceptibility to melanoma (odds ratio = 3.60, P = 0.0008), and fatalistic beliefs about melanoma (odds ratio = 0.57, P = 0.005). Compared with baseline, carriers reported significantly reduced anxiety scores at 2 weeks, and reduced depression scores at 2 weeks and 12 months, after receipt of genetic test results. Carriers also reported a significantly greater frequency of clinical skin examination at 12-month follow-up compared with decliners (chi2 = 5.70, P = 0.02). No hypothesis testing was carried out for noncarriers because of their limited number.
CONCLUSION: These data provide preliminary evidence for healthy psychological, behavioral, and cognitive adjustment after participation in genetic testing for melanoma risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19265718     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181993175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  32 in total

1.  Dispositional optimism and perceived risk interact to predict intentions to learn genome sequencing results.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Genetic test reporting enhances understanding of risk information and acceptance of prevention recommendations compared to family history-based counseling alone.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Lisa G Aspinwall; Tammy K Stump; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-07-16

3.  Timing and context: important considerations in the return of genetic results to research participants.

Authors:  Kate A McBride; Nina Hallowell; Martin H N Tattersall; Judy Kirk; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Gillian Mitchell; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-05-26

Review 4.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Development of an Educational Program Integrating Concepts of Genetic Risk and Preventive Strategies for Children with a Family History of Melanoma.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Lisa G Aspinwall; Elizabeth Nagelhout; Wendy Kohlmann; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Sheila Homburger; Ryan D Perkins; Douglas Grossman; Garrett Harding; Pamela Cassidy; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Genetic counseling, genetic testing, and risk perceptions for breast and colorectal cancer: Results from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Erin Turbitt; Megan C Roberts; Jennifer M Taber; Erika A Waters; Timothy S McNeel; Barbara B Biesecker; William M P Klein
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Perceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Wendy Kohlmann; Samantha L Leaf; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Skin cancer screening behaviours among individuals with a strong family history of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  N A Kasparian; J K McLoone; B Meiser; P N Butow; J M Simpson; G J Mann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to melanoma preventive behaviors for individuals at elevated risk.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Lisa G Aspinwall; Bridgid M Conn; Tammy Stump; Bridget Grahmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Development and Pilot Testing of a Decision Aid for Genomic Research Participants Notified of Clinically Actionable Research Findings for Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Amanda M Willis; Sian K Smith; Bettina Meiser; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Martin Tattersall; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.