| Literature DB >> 19262974 |
J E M Brouwers1, B van Rietbergen, R Huiskes, K Ito.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Using in vivo microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), we found in <span class="Gene">parathyroid hormone (<span class="Gene">PTH)-treated osteopenic rats linear increases in cortical and trabecular, due to increased trabecular thickness and number, bone mass. Bone was formed in cavities, leading to restoral of nearly cleaved trabeculae. For the first time, effects in PTH-treated rats were analyzed longitudinally.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19262974 PMCID: PMC2765647 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-0882-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Osteoporos Int ISSN: 0937-941X Impact factor: 4.507
Fig. 1CT scan of a proximal metaphysis showing hand-drawn contours of the metaphyseal and epiphyseal trabecular bone, b proximal metaphysis showing hand-drawn contours of metaphyseal cortical bone, and c diaphyseal cortical bone
Fig. 2Structural parameters in the metaphyseal proximal tibia for all groups at all time points (mean ± standard deviation)
Fig. 3Structural parameters in the epiphyseal, proximal tibia for all groups at all time points (mean ± standard deviation)
Fig. 4Cortical thickness and polar moment of inertia (pMOI) in the meta- and diaphysis of the tibia for all groups at all time points (mean ± standard deviation)
Fig. 5Registered images of metaphyseal (left) and diaphyseal (right) cortical bone taken at weeks 8 and 14 showing bone formation during 6 weeks in the cortex of a PTH-treated rat. Gray is bone at week 8, black is newly formed bone
Fig. 6CT-estimated bone mineral density of metaphyseal trabecular bone, metaphyseal cortical bone, diaphyseal cortical bone, and epiphyseal trabecular bone (mean ± standard deviation)
Fig. 7A trabecula in two PTH-treated ovariectomized rats was tracked over time to determine the development of bone formation (1 and 2). On the left of 1 and 2, you see three-dimensional segmented images of a trabecula, after PTH treatment is started at week 8, taken at weeks 8 (a), 10 (b), 12 (c), and 14 (d). On the right, you see overlaid two-dimensional segmented sections comparing weeks 8 and 10 (e), 10 and 12 (f), and 12 and 14 (g). Yellow indicates resorbed bone, green newly formed bone, and red unchanged bone. Bone formation is clearly seen over time in both trabeculae. In trabecula 1, bone is mostly deposited in the cavities in the first 2 weeks, while later on bone is added to the surface. In trabecula 2, the trabecula appears cleaved after segmentation, although most likely there was still a thin line of bone present. PTH treatment leads to bone formation at the cleaved site, where it is most needed hereby restoring the trabecula
Linear correlation between several structural parameters to predict gain in bone mass, gain in bone volume fraction, final bone mass, or final bone volume fraction
| Predictive variable | Outcome variable | Metaphysis | Epiphysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Slope |
| Slope | ||
| BS at weeks 8, 10, and 12 | ΔBV/TV over weeks 8–10, 10–12, and 12–14 | 0.42 | 0.0003 | 0.23 | 0.0011 |
| BS at weeks 8, 10, and 12 | ΔBV over weeks 8–10, 10–12, and 12–14 | 0.40 | 0.0077 | n.s. | – |
| BV/TV at weeks 8, 10, and 12 | ΔBV/TV over weeks 8–10, 10–12, and 12–14 | n.s. | – | 0.41 | −0.23 |
| BV at weeks 8, 10, and 12 | ΔBV over weeks 8–10, 10–12, and 12–14 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.25 | −0.21 |
| ΔBV/TV over weeks 0–8 | ΔBV/TV over weeks 8–14 | n.s. | – | n.s. | – |
| ΔBV over weeks 0–8 | ΔBV over weeks 8–14 | 0.48 | 0.95 | n.s. | – |
| BS at week 8 | ΔBV/TV over weeks 8–14 | 0.86 | 0.0012 | n.s. | – |
| BS at week 8 | ΔBV over weeks 8–14 | 0.77 | 0.030 | n.s | – |
| BV/TV at week 8 | ΔBV/TV over weeks 8–14 | 0.66 | 0.76 | n.s. | – |
| BV at week 8 | ΔBV over weeks 8–14 | 0.69 | 0.88 | n.s. | – |
| BV/TV at week 0 | BV/TV at week 14 | 0.81 | 1.3 | 0.85 | 1.6 |
| BV at week 0 | BV at week 14 | 0.89 | 1.3 | 0.93 | 0.96 |
Fig. 8Ultimate load, ultimate displacement, extrinsic stiffness, and energy determined from three-point bending test on tibiae after sacrifice at 14 weeks. *p < 0.05 compared to SHAM