BACKGROUND: Unexpected focal colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake is becoming a common clinical dilemma with the increasing utilization of positron emission tomography (PET). These findings may subsequently reveal malignant or premalignant pathology. AIM: In addition to reporting the prevalence of clinically significant colonic pathology associated with unexpected focal FDG uptake, this study analysed the correlation between pathological colonic segments with those reported on the FDG-PET scan. METHODS: The reports of 2071 consecutive PET-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans performed in a calendar year were reviewed. Information regarding subsequent patient investigation and management was collected from medical records. The segments harbouring foci of unexpected bowel FDG uptake were compared against the eventual outcome(s) of the endoscopic and pathological investigations. RESULTS: Among the 62 individual patients represented, 37 (60%) were investigated further. Clinically unsuspected neoplasms were found in 68% of those investigated, including 10 diagnosed with carcinoma. In addition, an unknown bowel lymphoma and 19 colonic adenomas were discovered. The positive predictive value for pathology was higher in the proximal colon than the distal colon. The segments in which the pathological findings were identified correlated well with those reported as abnormal on PET-CT. CONCLUSION: Unexpected bowel FDG uptake on PET-CT is associated with a high incidence of neoplastic pathology. In particular, focal FDG uptake in the proximal colon is associated with a high positive predictive value for neoplasm. The location of pathology is strongly concordant with endoscopic findings.
BACKGROUND: Unexpected focal colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake is becoming a common clinical dilemma with the increasing utilization of positron emission tomography (PET). These findings may subsequently reveal malignant or premalignant pathology. AIM: In addition to reporting the prevalence of clinically significant colonic pathology associated with unexpected focal FDG uptake, this study analysed the correlation between pathological colonic segments with those reported on the FDG-PET scan. METHODS: The reports of 2071 consecutive PET-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans performed in a calendar year were reviewed. Information regarding subsequent patient investigation and management was collected from medical records. The segments harbouring foci of unexpected bowel FDG uptake were compared against the eventual outcome(s) of the endoscopic and pathological investigations. RESULTS: Among the 62 individual patients represented, 37 (60%) were investigated further. Clinically unsuspected neoplasms were found in 68% of those investigated, including 10 diagnosed with carcinoma. In addition, an unknown bowel lymphoma and 19 colonic adenomas were discovered. The positive predictive value for pathology was higher in the proximal colon than the distal colon. The segments in which the pathological findings were identified correlated well with those reported as abnormal on PET-CT. CONCLUSION: Unexpected bowel FDG uptake on PET-CT is associated with a high incidence of neoplastic pathology. In particular, focal FDG uptake in the proximal colon is associated with a high positive predictive value for neoplasm. The location of pathology is strongly concordant with endoscopic findings.
Authors: Matthew E Burge; Nick O'Rourke; David Cavallucci; Richard Bryant; Alessandra Francesconi; Kathleen Houston; David Wyld; Melissa Eastgate; Robert Finch; George Hopkins; Paul Thomas; David Macfarlane Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 3.647