Literature DB >> 19261762

Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system.

Sally A Gauci1, Arianne M Dantas, David A Williams, Robert E Kemm.   

Abstract

We investigated whether an active learning approach, facilitated by a personal response system, would lead to improved student engagement and learning outcomes in large-group physiology lectures for undergraduate science students. We focused on encouraging students' active learning in lectures, whereas previous studies have made more use of audience response technology during lectures for formative or summative assessment. Students voluntarily answered questions posed during lectures with their personal response system (clickers), with individual answers automatically collated for immediate histogram display. This feedback then dictated the focus of followup discussions in the lecture. Student and instructor attitudes were surveyed through voluntary interviews with student responses correlated with their degree of clicker participation and individual exam results. Active lectures were found to increase both student motivation and engagement. Students who participated in answering questions achieved better results than students who chose not to. Students with the lowest scores in a prerequisite course (previous semester physiology exam marks of < 60%) showed significantly better outcomes from the use of clickers than both middle-achieving (60-75%) and high-achieving (>75%) entry students. Significant improvement was evident in both mid- and end-semester exam results compared with student cohorts from preceding years, although this could also be influenced by many other factors. Increased student engagement and the immediate feedback obtained during lectures were advantages commonly noted by lecturing staff.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19261762     DOI: 10.1152/advan.00109.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  11 in total

1.  An Empirical Study of Neural Network-Based Audience Response Technology in a Human Anatomy Course for Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  José Luis Fernández-Alemán; Laura López-González; Ofelia González-Sequeros; Chrisina Jayne; Juan José López-Jiménez; Juan Manuel Carrillo-de-Gea; Ambrosio Toval
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Perceptions of pharmacy students, faculty members, and administrators on the use of technology in the classroom.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Mary S Hayney; Wallace Marsh; Michael W Neville; Stephen O'Barr; Erin D Sheets; Larry D Calhoun
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Impact of a student response system on short- and long-term learning in a drug literature evaluation course.

Authors:  Flora C Liu; Jacob P Gettig; Nancy Fjortoft
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Medical school hotline: harnessing technology for a 21st century medical education.

Authors:  Joseph W Turban
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2011-04

5.  A Faculty Toolkit for Formative Assessment in Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Greg L Alston; Eleanora Bird; Shauna M Buring; Katherine A Kelley; Nanci L Murphy; Lauren S Schlesselman; Cindy D Stowe; Julianna E Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Audience response technology: engaging and empowering non-medical prescribing students in pharmacology learning.

Authors:  Joanne S Lymn; Alison Mostyn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Using Audience Response Technology to provide formative feedback on pharmacology performance for non-medical prescribing students--a preliminary evaluation.

Authors:  Alison Mostyn; Oonagh Meade; Joanne S Lymn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Use of elaborate feedback and an audience-response-system in dental education.

Authors:  Alexander Rahman; Silke Jacker-Guhr; Ingmar Staufenbiel; Karen Meyer; Michaela Zupanic; Merle Hahnemann; Anne-Katrin Lührs; Jörg Eberhard
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2013-08-15

9.  Towards the optimal use of video recordings to support the flipped classroom in medical school basic sciences education.

Authors:  Stephen J Bordes; Donna Walker; Louis Jonathan Modica; Joanne Buckland; Andrew K Sobering
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2021-12

10.  Student evaluation of clickers in a dental pathology course.

Authors:  Carmen Llena; Leopoldo Forner; Roger Cueva
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.