Literature DB >> 19260145

Daily mini quizzes as means for improving student performance in anatomy course.

Ana Poljicanin1, Ana Carić, Katarina Vilović, Vana Kosta, Maja Marinović Guić, Jure Aljinović, Ivica Grković.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate daily-written 10-question quizzes in a medical anatomy course as a way to integrate assessment into the course and to evaluate their effect on the course success.
METHODS: Students answering correctly 8/10 or more questions were awarded 0.5 points per quiz. There were 34 quizzes with a maximum point score 17. Measurable outcomes of academic progress in anatomy course (pass rates on 4 examination terms, total pass rate, and average marks) were calculated, and 2007/08 academic year was compared with the previous academic year in which daily written quizzes were not a part of the course. The relationship between cumulative points on daily quizzes and 3 components of the final examination (written, practical, and oral) for 2007/08 academic year was assessed by non-parametric correlation testing.
RESULTS: Individual scores on quizzes ranged from 1.5 to 13.5 points. There was a positive correlation between scores on quizzes and grades on 3 components of the final examination: written (Spearman rho=0.784, P<0.001, n=79), practical (Spearman rho=0.342, P<0.002, n=79), and oral (Spearman rho=0.683, P<0.001, n=79) part. Compared with students in the previous academic year, students attending the course with daily quizzes significantly improved their academic achievement, expressed as the pass rate at the first examination term (39% vs 62%, respectively, chi(2) test, P=0.006, ) and the average course grade (2.71+/-1.08 vs 3.38+/-1.26, respectively; t test, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Despite their frequency and possible associated stress, daily quizzes were associated with better academic success in the anatomy course.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19260145      PMCID: PMC2657562          DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2009.50.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Croat Med J        ISSN: 0353-9504            Impact factor:   1.351


  9 in total

1.  Weekly quizzes in extended-matching format as a means of monitoring students' progress in gross anatomy.

Authors:  I K Lukić; V Gluncić; V Katavić; Z Petanjek; D Jalsovec; A Marusić
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Differential effects of two types of formative assessment in predicting performance of first-year medical students.

Authors:  Sally Krasne; Paul F Wimmers; Anju Relan; Thomas A Drake
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Rethinking exams and letter grades: how much can teachers delegate to students?

Authors:  Elizabeth Kitchen; Summer H King; Diane F Robison; Richard R Sudweeks; William S Bradshaw; John D Bell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  High-quality learning: harder to achieve than we think?

Authors:  Karen Mattick; Lynn Knight
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  An investigation into medical students' approaches to anatomy learning in a systems-based prosection course.

Authors:  Claire France Smith; Haydn Mathias
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  The virtues of extended matching and uncued tests as alternatives to multiple choice questions.

Authors:  B A Fenderson; I Damjanov; M R Robeson; J J Veloski; E Rubin
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Testing of medical students with open-ended, uncued questions.

Authors:  I Damjanov; B A Fenderson; J J Veloski; E Rubin
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Introducing a reward system in assessment in histology: a comment on the learning strategies it might engender.

Authors:  M McLean
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2001-11-26       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper.

Authors:  Edward J Palmer; Peter G Devitt
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Assessment of anatomical knowledge for clinical practice: perceptions of clinicians and students.

Authors:  Simon Rowland; Kamran Ahmed; David Ceri Davies; Hutan Ashrafian; Vishal Patel; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas A Paraskeva; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  The practical examination types (spot test and slide test) of gross anatomy course in faculty of medicine: a simultaneous evaluation of the aspect of student success.

Authors:  Kemal Emre Özen; Kübra Erdoğan; Burhan Yarar; Gizem Çizmeci; Gonca Ay Keselik; Ferhan Elmalı; Mehmet Ali Malas
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Perceptions of Medical Undergraduate Students on Curricular Changes in Anatomy: An Embedded Design Mixed Method Study.

Authors:  Aparna Muraleedharan; Saranya Ragavan; Nutan Nalini Bage; Rema Devi
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2022-01

4.  Challenging medical students with an interim assessment: a positive effect on formal examination score in a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Marleen Olde Bekkink; Rogier Donders; Goos N P van Muijen; Dirk J Ruiter
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 3.853

5.  Effects of frequent announced parasitology quizzes on the academic achievement.

Authors:  Ghasem Zamini; Mohammad Bagher Khadem Erfan; Mohammad Reza Rahmani; Mohammad Sadegh Khodavaisy; Behroz Davari
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.012

6.  Factors related to academic failure in preclinical medical education: A systematic review.

Authors:  Soleiman Ahmady; Nasrin Khajeali; Farshad Sharifi; Zohre Sadat Mirmoghtadaei
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2019-04

7.  Cumulative assessment: strategic choices to influence students' study effort.

Authors:  Wouter Kerdijk; René A Tio; B Florentine Mulder; Janke Cohen-Schotanus
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.