Literature DB >> 17614883

High-quality learning: harder to achieve than we think?

Karen Mattick1, Lynn Knight.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: High-quality learning in the context of medical education can be defined by current conceptions of a deep approach to learning and studying, in combination with metacognitive skills such as personal organisation and reflection on learning. Modern undergraduate education aims to provide an environment that will promote high-quality learning, but this is not as easy to achieve as it might at first seem. Part of the difficulty arises because it is student perceptions of the learning and assessment environment that determine the adopted approach to studying and these are notoriously hard to predict.
OBJECTIVE: To generate a detailed understanding of aspects that facilitate and inhibit high-quality learning within an innovative, undergraduate medical programme.
METHODS: We carried out semi-structured interviews with Year 2 undergraduate students.
RESULTS: Self-directed, problem-based and vocationally relevant activities appeared to promote high-quality learning. Unanticipated barriers to high-quality learning in this setting included a perceived lack of useful feedback on learning, the assessment of applied medical knowledge for a subset of underperforming students, anatomy as a curricular topic and the quantity of information to be assimilated in medicine.
CONCLUSIONS: Only by understanding the barriers as they are perceived by students can we design evidence-based modifications to curricula that are likely to be successful in promoting high-quality learning.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17614883     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02783.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  17 in total

1.  Daily mini quizzes as means for improving student performance in anatomy course.

Authors:  Ana Poljicanin; Ana Carić; Katarina Vilović; Vana Kosta; Maja Marinović Guić; Jure Aljinović; Ivica Grković
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  Temporal structure of first-year courses and success at course exams: comparison of traditional continual and block delivery of anatomy and chemistry courses.

Authors:  Daniela Salopek; Jasna Lovrić; Darko Hren; Ana Marusić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.351

3.  Transforming a large-class lecture course to a smaller-group interactive course.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Undirected learning styles and academic risk: Analysis of the impact of stress, strain and coping.

Authors:  Stephen Kimatian; Sara Lloyd; Jeffrey Berger; Lorraine Steiner; Robert McKay; Deborah Schwengal
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2017-04-01

5.  Medical students' approaches to learning over a full degree programme.

Authors:  William A Reid; Phillip Evans; Edward Duvall
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2012-08-24

6.  Student approaches for learning in medicine: what does it tell us about the informal curriculum?

Authors:  Jianzhen Zhang; Raymond F Peterson; Ieva Z Ozolins
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Exploring factors affecting undergraduate medical students' study strategies in the clinical years: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hanan M F Al Kadri; Mohamed S Al-Moamary; Margaret Elzubair; Mohi Eldien Magzoub; Abdulrahman AlMutairi; Christopher Roberts; Cees van der Vleuten
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.853

8.  Learning contexts at two UK medical schools: a comparative study using mixed methods.

Authors:  Andrew Grant; Paul Kinnersley; Max Field
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-03-19

9.  Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design.

Authors:  Esther M Bergman; Anique B H de Bruin; Marc A T M Vorstenbosch; Jan G M Kooloos; Ghita C W M Puts; Jimmie Leppink; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Students' and teachers' perceptions of clinical assessment program: A qualitative study in a PBL curriculum.

Authors:  Hanan Mf Al Kadri; Mohamed S Al-Moamary; Cees van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.