Literature DB >> 19259627

Screening Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Clostridium perfringens as indicator organisms in evaluating pathogen-reducing capacity in biogas plants.

Montira Watcharasukarn1, Prasad Kaparaju, Jean-Philippe Steyer, Karen A Krogfelt, Irini Angelidaki.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to identify an indicator organism(s) in evaluating the pathogen-reducing capacity of biogas plants. Fresh cow manure containing 10(4) to 10(5) colony forming unit (CFU) per milliliter of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis along with an inoculated Clostridium perfringens strain were exposed to 37 degrees C for 15 days, 55 degrees C for 48 h, and 70 degrees C for 24 h. C. perfringens was the most heat-resistant organism followed by E. faecalis, while E. coli was the most heat-sensitive organism. E. coli was reduced below detection limit at all temperatures with log(10) reductions of 4.94 (10 s), 4.37 (40 min), and 2.6 (5 days) at 70 degrees C, 55 degrees C, and 37 degrees C, respectively. Maximum log(10) reductions for E. faecalis were 1.77 at 70 degrees C (1 day), 1.7 at 55 degrees C (2 days) and 3.13 at 37 degrees C (15 days). For C. perfringens, maximum log(10) reduction at 37 degrees C was 1.35 log(10) units (15 days) compared to less than 1 unit at 55 and 70 degrees C. Modeling results showed that E. faecalis and C. perfringens had higher amount of heat-resistant fraction than E. coli. Thus, E. faecalis and C. perfringens can be used as indicator organisms to evaluate pathogen-reducing capacity in biogas plants at high temperatures of 55 degrees C and 70 degrees C while at 37 degrees C E. coli could also be included as indicator organism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19259627     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-009-9497-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  17 in total

Review 1.  Escherichia coli O157:H7 as an emerging foodborne pathogen: a literature review.

Authors:  S Park; R W Worobo; R A Durst
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.176

2.  Numbers of enterococci in water, sewage, and feces determined by the membrane filter technique with an improved medium.

Authors:  L W SLANETZ; C H BARTLEY
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1957-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Thermal inactivation of Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens vegetative cells and spores in pork luncheon roll.

Authors:  B Byrne; G Dunne; D J Bolton
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 5.516

4.  The effect of C18 unsaturated fatty acids of methane production in vitro by mixed rumen bacteria.

Authors:  D I Demeyer; H K Henderickx
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1967-06-06

5.  The effect of temperature and selective agents on the growth of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:3 in pure culture.

Authors:  C M Logue; J J Sheridan; D A McDowell; I S Blair; T Hegarty
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  Survival of Listeria monocytogenes and Enterococcus faecium in sludge evaluated by real-time PCR and culture methods.

Authors:  N Wery; A-M Pourcher; V Stan; J-P Delgenes; F Picard-Bonnaud; J-J Godon
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.858

Review 7.  Yersinia in effluents from the food-processing industry.

Authors:  M Hartung; K Gerigk
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.181

8.  Survival of salmonellas and Ascaris suum eggs in a thermophilic biogas plant.

Authors:  L Plym-Forshell
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.695

9.  Comparison of media for the enumeration of Clostridium perfringens.

Authors:  S M Harmon; D A Kautter; J T Peeler
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-05

10.  Verotoxinogenic Escherichia coli (VTEC) O157:H7--a nationwide Swedish survey of bovine faeces.

Authors:  A Albihn; E Eriksson; C Wallen; A Aspán
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.695

View more
  10 in total

1.  A perspective on the prevalence of DNA enteric virus genomes in anaerobic-digested biological wastes.

Authors:  Kelvin Wong; Irene Xagoraraki
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Persistence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis at a farm-scale biogas plant supplied with manure from paratuberculosis-affected dairy cattle.

Authors:  I Slana; R Pribylova; A Kralova; I Pavlik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Cultured and uncultured microbial community associated with biogas production in anaerobic digestion processes.

Authors:  Júlia Ronzella Ottoni; Suzan Prado Fernandes Bernal; Tiago Joelzer Marteres; Franciele Natividade Luiz; Viviane Piccin Dos Santos; Ângelo Gabriel Mari; Juliana Gaio Somer; Valéria Maia de Oliveira; Michel Rodrigo Zambrano Passarini
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.552

4.  Inactivation of indicator microorganisms and biological hazards by standard and/or alternative processing methods in Category 2 and 3 animal by-products and derived products to be used as organic fertilisers and/or soil improvers.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutsoumanis; Ana Allende; Declan Bolton; Sara Bover-Cid; Marianne Chemaly; Robert Davies; Alessandra De Cesare; Lieve Herman; Friederike Hilbert; Roland Lindqvist; Maarten Nauta; Luisa Peixe; Giuseppe Ru; Marion Simmons; Panagiotis Skandamis; Elisabetta Suffredini; Benedetta Bottari; Enda Cummins; Kari Ylivainio; Irene Muñoz Guajardo; Angel Ortiz-Pelaez; Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-12-02

5.  The effect of anaerobic digestion and storage on indicator microorganisms in swine and dairy manure.

Authors:  Annamaria Costa; Claudia Gusmara; Davide Gardoni; Mauro Zaninelli; Fulvia Tambone; Vittorio Sala; Marcella Guarino
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Evaluation of the occurrence of sporulating and nonsporulating pathogenic bacteria in manure and in digestate of five agricultural biogas plants.

Authors:  Caroline Le Maréchal; Céline Druilhe; Elisabeth Repérant; Evelyne Boscher; Sandra Rouxel; Sophie Le Roux; Typhaine Poëzévara; Christine Ziebal; Catherine Houdayer; Bérengère Nagard; Frédéric Barbut; Anne-Marie Pourcher; Martine Denis
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Challenges of pathogen inactivation in animal manure through anaerobic digestion: a short review.

Authors:  Min Lin; Aijie Wang; Lijuan Ren; Wei Qiao; Simon Mdondo Wandera; Renjie Dong
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.269

8.  Detailed analysis of metagenome datasets obtained from biogas-producing microbial communities residing in biogas reactors does not indicate the presence of putative pathogenic microorganisms.

Authors:  Felix G Eikmeyer; Antje Rademacher; Angelika Hanreich; Magdalena Hennig; Sebastian Jaenicke; Irena Maus; Daniel Wibberg; Martha Zakrzewski; Alfred Pühler; Michael Klocke; Andreas Schlüter
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 9.  An Overview of the Control of Bacterial Pathogens in Cattle Manure.

Authors:  Christy E Manyi-Loh; Sampson N Mamphweli; Edson L Meyer; Golden Makaka; Michael Simon; Anthony I Okoh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Microbial load in bio-slurry from different biogas plants in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Md Ashraful Islam; Proteek Biswas; Abdullah Al Momen Sabuj; Zobayda Farzana Haque; Chayan Kumer Saha; Md Monjurul Alam; Md Tanvir Rahman; Sukumar Saha
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2019-08-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.