Literature DB >> 19259276

Minimally invasive surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma.

Reza John Mehran1.   

Abstract

Surgical resection has proven successful in eradicating cancer of the esophagus, and it remains one of the main treatment modalities available for the curative management of patients with this disease. Unfortunately, patient morbidity is high because of the extensive nature of the surgery, which traditionally involves opening the chest and abdomen. Most time-honored techniques used to resect the esophagus and reconstruct the alimentary passage use the stomach as the replacement conduit, and a major abdominal dissection is therefore involved. Hoping to decrease the perioperative morbidity associated with esophagectomy, a number of thoracic surgeons have started to experiment with resection of the esophagus using aminimally invasive approach in select groups of patients. In minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), body cavities are accessed using a camera and fine, narrow instruments inserted through small incisions. Experience with abdominal surgery over the past decade suggests that a number of operative variables are improved using minimally invasive procedures, such as blood loss, rate of perioperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Data also suggest that the minimally invasive approach is comparable to or more advantageous than open procedures, in terms of both short- and long-term outcomes. Similarly, based on the limited data available today, shortterm outcomes after MIE are at least comparable with outcomes associated with open procedures. Minimally invasive resection of the esophagus for the management of esophageal cancer is feasible and safe. Whether MIE is better than traditional open techniques remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19259276      PMCID: PMC2632570     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res        ISSN: 1934-7820


  14 in total

1.  Peri-operative risk factors for acute lung injury after elective oesophagectomy.

Authors:  S Tandon; A Batchelor; R Bullock; A Gascoigne; M Griffin; N Hayes; J Hing; I Shaw; I Warnell; S V Baudouin
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer is associated with less immunochemokine disturbances than thoracotomy.

Authors:  Calvin S H Ng; Song Wan; Connie W C Hui; Innes Y P Wan; Tak Wai Lee; Malcolm J Underwood; Anthony P C Yim
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 3.  Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  E H Gemmill; P McCulloch
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better? Quality of life considerations.

Authors:  Todd L Demmy; Chukwumere Nwogu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Investigation of clinical and dosimetric factors associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in esophageal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery.

Authors:  Shu-lian Wang; Zhongxing Liao; Ara A Vaporciyan; Susan L Tucker; Helen Liu; Xiong Wei; Stephen Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani; James D Cox; Ritsuko Komaki
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Totally laparoscopic total and subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymph node dissection for early and advanced gastric cancer: early and long-term results of a 100-patient series.

Authors:  Cristiano G S Huscher; Andrea Mingoli; Giovanna Sgarzini; Gioia Brachini; Barbara Binda; Massimiliano Di Paola; Cecilia Ponzano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Resection for esophageal cancer: strategies for optimal management.

Authors:  Arjun Pennathur; James D Luketich
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: experience with more than 600 cases.

Authors:  S Tanimura; M Higashino; Y Fukunaga; M Takemura; Y Tanaka; Y Fujiwara; H Osugi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Arjun Pennathur; James D Luketich
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11

2.  Medical Data Analysis of CYP1B1 Gene Polymorphism and Clinical Prognosis of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Xia Han; Danqing Li; Shaofeng Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.