Literature DB >> 19258691

Bird or bat: comparing airframe design and flight performance.

Anders Hedenström1, L Christoffer Johansson, Geoffrey R Spedding.   

Abstract

Birds and bats have evolved powered flight independently, which makes a comparison of evolutionary 'design' solutions potentially interesting. In this paper we highlight similarities and differences with respect to flight characteristics, including morphology, flight kinematics, aerodynamics, energetics and flight performance. Birds' size range is 0.002-15 kg and bats' size range is 0.002-1.5 kg. The wingbeat kinematics differ between birds and bats, which is mainly due to the different flexing of the wing during the upstroke and constraints by having a wing of feathers and a skin membrane, respectively. Aerodynamically, bats appear to generate a more complex wake than birds. Bats may be more closely adapted for slow maneuvering flight than birds, as required by their aerial hawking foraging habits. The metabolic rate and power required to fly are similar among birds and bats. Both groups share many characteristics associated with flight, such as for example low amounts of DNA in cells, the ability to accumulate fat as fuel for hibernation and migration, and parallel habitat-related wing shape adaptations.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258691     DOI: 10.1088/1748-3182/4/1/015001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim        ISSN: 1748-3182            Impact factor:   2.956


  15 in total

1.  Lift enhancement by bats' dynamically changing wingspan.

Authors:  Shizhao Wang; Xing Zhang; Guowei He; Tianshu Liu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Comparative aerodynamic performance of flapping flight in two bat species using time-resolved wake visualization.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; L Christoffer Johansson; York Winter; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Commuting fruit bats beneficially modulate their flight in relation to wind.

Authors:  Nir Sapir; Nir Horvitz; Dina K N Dechmann; Jakob Fahr; Martin Wikelski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Upstroke wing flexion and the inertial cost of bat flight.

Authors:  Daniel K Riskin; Attila Bergou; Kenneth S Breuer; Sharon M Swartz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  A potential role for bat tail membranes in flight control.

Authors:  James D Gardiner; Grigorios Dimitriadis; Jonathan R Codd; Robert L Nudds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Digital gene expression tag profiling of bat digits provides robust candidates contributing to wing formation.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Dong Dong; Binghua Ru; Rebecca L Young; Naijian Han; Tingting Guo; Shuyi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Assessing arboreal adaptations of bird antecedents: testing the ecological setting of the origin of the avian flight stroke.

Authors:  T Alexander Dececchi; Hans C E Larsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparing aerodynamic efficiency in birds and bats suggests better flight performance in birds.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; L Christoffer Johansson; Melissa S Bowlin; York Winter; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Qualitative skeletal correlates of wing shape in extant birds (Aves: Neoaves).

Authors:  Tobin L Hieronymus
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.