Literature DB >> 19258480

Progressive commercial cigarette yield reduction: biochemical exposure and behavioral assessment.

Neal L Benowitz1, Katherine M Dains, Sharon M Hall, Susan Stewart, Margaret Wilson, Delia Dempsey, Peyton Jacob.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mandated reduction of exposure to nicotine and other cigarette toxins has been proposed as a possible national regulatory strategy. However, tapering using lower yield commercial cigarettes may not be effective in reducing nicotine or tar exposure due to compensatory smoking behavior. We examined the effects of gradual reduction of nicotine yield in commercial cigarettes on smoking behavior, with an assessment of nicotine intake and exposure to tobacco smoke toxins.
METHODS: This 10-week longitudinal study of 20 smokers involved smoking the usual brand followed by different brands with progressively lower machine-determined yields, ranging from 0.9 to 0.1 mg nicotine, each smoked for 1 week. Subjects were followed for 4 weeks after returning to smoking the usual brand (or quitting). Smoking behaviors, biomarkers of tobacco smoke exposure, and cardiovascular effects were measured.
FINDINGS: Cotinine and other biomarkers of smoke exposure remained unchanged comparing the usual brand with the 0.4 mg nicotine brands. A 30% to 40% decrease in nicotine, carbon monoxide, and carcinogen exposure comparing 0.1 mg nicotine cigarettes with baseline was observed. Self-efficacy was significantly increased and dependence decreased after tapering. IMPLICATIONS: We confirm prior cross-sectional population and experimental studies showing complete compensation for cigarettes down to the 0.4 mg nicotine range. Nicotine and tobacco toxin exposure were substantially reduced while smoking 0.1 mg nicotine cigarettes. Our data suggest that the degree of nicotine dependence of smokers may be lowered with progressive yield tapering. Gradual tapering of smokers from regular to ultralow nicotine yield commercial cigarettes might facilitate smoking cessation and warrants future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258480      PMCID: PMC2802575          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  22 in total

1.  Reduced tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide exposure while smoking ultralow- but not low-yield cigarettes.

Authors:  N L Benowitz; P Jacob; L Yu; R Talcott; S Hall; R T Jones
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Smoker intake from cigarettes in the 1-mg Federal Trade Commission tar class.

Authors:  G B Gori; C J Lynch
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Effects of nicotine fading and relapse prevention on smoking cessation.

Authors:  R A Brown; E Lichtenstein; K O McIntyre; J Harrington-Kostur
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1984-04

4.  Improved gas chromatographic method for the determination of nicotine and cotinine in biologic fluids.

Authors:  P Jacob; M Wilson; N L Benowitz
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1981-01-02

5.  Nicotine fading, self-monitoring and cigarette fading to produce cigarette abstinence or controlled smoking.

Authors:  R M Foxx; E Axelroth
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1983

6.  Nicotine fading as a nonaversive alternative in a broad-spectrum treatment for eliminating smoking.

Authors:  H A Lando; P G McGovern
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Nicotine and carcinogen exposure with smoking of progressively reduced nicotine content cigarette.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Sharon M Hall; Susan Stewart; Margaret Wilson; Delia Dempsey; Peyton Jacob
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Smokers of low-yield cigarettes do not consume less nicotine.

Authors:  N L Benowitz; S M Hall; R I Herning; P Jacob; R T Jones; A L Osman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Human urinary carcinogen metabolites: biomarkers for investigating tobacco and cancer.

Authors:  Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal.

Authors:  J R Hughes; D Hatsukami
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1986-03
View more
  19 in total

1.  A lack of association between severity of nicotine withdrawal and individual differences in compensatory nicotine self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Andrew C Harris; Paul R Pentel; Danielle Burroughs; Mylissa D Staley; Mark G Lesage
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Nicotine reduction revisited: science and future directions.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Kenneth A Perkins; Mark G Lesage; David L Ashley; Jack E Henningfield; Neal L Benowitz; Cathy L Backinger; Mitch Zeller
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Association of Cigarette Type and Nicotine Dependence in Patients Presenting for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Nichole T Tanner; Nina A Thomas; Ralph Ward; Alana Rojewski; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Benjamin A Toll; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Sex differences in nicotine self-administration in rats during progressive unit dose reduction: implications for nicotine regulation policy.

Authors:  Patricia Grebenstein; Danielle Burroughs; Yan Zhang; Mark G LeSage
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Effectiveness of switching to very low nicotine content cigarettes plus nicotine patch versus reducing daily cigarette consumption plus nicotine patch to decrease dependence: an exploratory randomized trial.

Authors:  Elias M Klemperer; John R Hughes; Peter W Callas; Joy A Benner; Nicholas E Morley
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Predictors of the nicotine reinforcement threshold, compensation, and elasticity of demand in a rodent model of nicotine reduction policy.

Authors:  Patricia E Grebenstein; Danielle Burroughs; Samuel A Roiko; Paul R Pentel; Mark G LeSage
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Tobacco harm reduction and the evolution of nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Mark Parascandola
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Reduced nicotine product standards for combustible tobacco: building an empirical basis for effective regulation.

Authors:  Eric C Donny; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Alan F Sved; Jennifer W Tidey; Rachel N Cassidy
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Use of High-Nicotine/Tar-Yield (Full-Flavor) Cigarettes and Risk for Nicotine Dependence in Nationally Representative Samples of US Smokers.

Authors:  Ryan Redner; Thomas J White; Janice Y Bunn; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  The effects of nicotine self-administration and withdrawal on concurrently available chow and sucrose intake in adult male rats.

Authors:  Patricia E Bunney; Danielle Burroughs; Christine Hernandez; Mark G LeSage
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.