Literature DB >> 11166108

Psychophysiological differentiation of deception: the effects of electrodermal lability and mode of responding on skin conductance and heart rate.

H W Gödert1, H G Rill, G Vossel.   

Abstract

The differentiation-of-deception paradigm enables the examination of deception as a psychophysiological process by varying, within subjects, two conditions which differ only with respect to honesty and deception. The present experiment assessed the effects of two group factors - electrodermal lability and mode of responding - on the deception phenomenon in a situation with low emotional involvement and mental load. Skin conductance responses, phasic heart rate, self-rated relaxation, calmness, and concentration were the dependent variables. Twenty questions referring to general knowledge were presented on a monitor. The 88 male participants answered half of the questions deceptively and the other half honestly, depending on which of two signals appeared on the screen. Half of the subjects answered verbally and the others by pressing keys. For electrodermal lability and mode of responding, significant main effects on skin conductance and heart rate were obtained. The expected main effect of truthfulness emerged in all variables, without being affected by the group factors. These findings, therefore, extend the generality and robustness of the differentiation-of-deception phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11166108     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00149-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  7 in total

1.  Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Thomas Bauermann; Peter Stoeter; Gerhard Vossel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A cardiorespiratory classifier of voluntary and involuntary electrodermal activity.

Authors:  Stefanie Blain; Sarah D Power; Ervin Sejdic; Alex Mihailidis; Tom Chau
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  The presentation order of cue and target matters in deception study.

Authors:  Guangheng Dong; Yanbo Hu; Qilin Lu; Haiyan Wu
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.759

4.  fMRI-activation patterns in the detection of concealed information rely on memory-related effects.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Olga Klimecki; Thomas Bauermann; Peter Stoeter; Gerhard Vossel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Deceptive Intentions: Can Cues to Deception Be Measured before a Lie Is Even Stated?

Authors:  Sabine Ströfer; Matthijs L Noordzij; Elze G Ufkes; Ellen Giebels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Predicting Dishonesty When the Stakes Are High: Physiologic Responses During Face-to-Face Interactions Identifies Who Reneges on Promises to Cooperate.

Authors:  Paul J Zak; Jorge A Barraza; Xinbo Hu; Giti Zahedzadeh; John Murray
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Wearable Technology for Detecting Significant Moments in Individuals with Dementia.

Authors:  Chelsey Lai Kwan; Yacine Mahdid; Rossio Motta Ochoa; Keven Lee; Melissa Park; Stefanie Blain-Moraes
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.