| Literature DB >> 19258207 |
J Kiene1, Arndt P Schulz, S Hillbricht, Ch Jürgens, A Paech.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The methods for ankle arthrodesis differ significantly, probably a sign that no method is clearly superior to others. In the last ten years there is a clear favour toward internal fixation. We retrospectively evaluate the technique and evaluate the clinical long term results of external fixation in a triangular frame. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1994 to 2001 a consecutive series of 95 patients with end stage arthritis of the ankle joint were treated. Retrospectively the case notes were evaluated regarding trauma history, medical complaints, further injuries and illnesses, walking and pain status and occupational issues and the clinical examination before arthrodesis. Mean age at the index procedure was 45.4 years (18-82), 67 patients were male (70.5%). Via a bilateral approach the malleoli and the joint surfaces were resected. An AO fixator was applied with two Steinmann-nails inserted with approximately 8 cm distance in the distal tibia, one in the neck of the talus and one in the dorsal calcaneus. The fixator was removed after approximately 12 weeks. Follow up examination at mean 4.4 years included a standardised questionnaire and a clinical examination including the criteria of the AOFAS-Score and radiographs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19258207 PMCID: PMC3352201 DOI: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-1-25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Med Res ISSN: 0949-2321 Impact factor: 2.175
Figure 1External fixator applied in a slightly triangular fashion, compression is applied between distal tibial and talar Steinmann-nail.
Figure 2.
Figure 3Radiographs of a 42 year old male patient 98 months after arthrodesis. There are signs of subtalar arthrosis, the Kitaoka score was 62.
reported non-union rates after internal arthrodesis of the ankle joint
| Authors | Year | Non union/ | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan et al. [ | (1985) | 5/101 | 5% |
| Breitfuß et al. [ | (1989) | 0/25 | 0% |
| Myerson/Quill [ | (1990) | 1/33 | 3% |
| Moeckel et al. [ | (1990) | 2/40 | 5% |
| Thermann et al. [ | (1996) | 2/28 | 7.1 |
| Crosby et al. [ | (1996) | 3/42 | 7.1 |
| Rockett et al. [ | (1997) | 1/14 | 7.1% |
| Monroe [ | (1999) | 2/29 | 6.8% |
| Buchner/Sabo [ | (2003) | 1/23 | 4% |
| All | 17/345 | 4% |