Literature DB >> 19258150

The minimal clinically important difference of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire.

Melissa J Shauver1, Kevin C Chung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the change in score required in various domains of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) to indicate meaningful patient improvement, or the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), for 3 common hand conditions: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and distal radius fracture (DRF).
METHODS: The MHQ was administered to patients at 2 time points. Patient satisfaction was defined as a satisfaction score > or =80% of the standard deviation of that patient sample. The minimal change in score in specific MHQ domains that corresponded with patient satisfaction was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: For CTS patients, MCIDs of 23, 13, and 8 were identified for the pain, function, and work domains, respectively. For RA patients, pain and function were also identified as having discriminative ability, with MCIDs of 11 and 13, respectively. An MCID of 3 was identified for the activities of daily living domain. For DRF patients, no MHQ domains showed discriminative ability because of the ceiling effect at the 3-month assessment period.
CONCLUSIONS: Individual domains of the MHQ can be used to discriminate between patients who are satisfied and those who are not after either carpal tunnel release or silicone arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal joints for RA. Pain and function are the domains of the MHQ that are best able to discriminate between patients who are satisfied and those who are not. The identical function MCID for both RA patients and CTS patients, despite markedly different preoperative values, indicates that a standard amount of functional change may indicate patient satisfaction. High postoperative satisfaction, even only 3 months after surgery, prevented any domains from showing discriminative ability for the DRF patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258150      PMCID: PMC4413464          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  18 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery.

Authors:  Sandra V Kotsis; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Understanding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Authors:  Jerome Fan; Suneel Upadhye; Andrew Worster
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.410

4.  Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and physical measurements in outcome studies of distal radius fracture treatment.

Authors:  Sandra V Kotsis; Frank H Lau; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 5.  The outcomes of outcome studies in plastic surgery: a systematic review of 17 years of plastic surgery research.

Authors:  Erika Davis Sears; Patricia B Burns; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Mispredictions and misrecollections: challenges for subjective outcome measurement.

Authors:  Dylan M Smith; Stephanie L Brown; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Predictors of functional outcomes after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Sandra V Kotsis; H Myra Kim
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 8.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.

Authors:  M H Zweig; G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change.

Authors:  K C Chung; J B Hamill; M R Walters; R A Hayward
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

Authors:  K C Chung; M S Pillsbury; M R Walters; R A Hayward
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.230

View more
  35 in total

1.  Patients With Thumb-base Osteoarthritis Scheduled for Surgery Have More Symptoms, Worse Psychological Profile, and Higher Expectations Than Nonsurgical Counterparts: A Large Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Robbert M Wouters; Ana-Maria Vranceanu; Harm P Slijper; Guus M Vermeulen; Mark J W van der Oest; Ruud W Selles; Jarry T Porsius
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Long-term outcomes of major upper extremity replantations.

Authors:  Wendy Ky Ng; Manraj Nirmal Kaur; Achilleas Thoma
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  What Is the Impact of Comorbidities on Self-rated Hand Function in Patients With Symptomatic Trapeziometacarpal Arthritis?

Authors:  Ryan Calfee; Jennifer Chu; Amelia Sorensen; Erin Martens; John Elfar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Normative Values of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire for Patients with and without Hand Conditions.

Authors:  Michael T Nolte; Melissa J Shauver; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Contribution of functional parameters to patient-rated outcomes after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Melissa J Shauver; Kate Wan-Chu Chang; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  An outcome study for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a multicenter study by the surgery for ulnar nerve (SUN) study group.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Jennifer F Waljee; Patricia B Burns; Kevin C Chung; R Glenn Gaston; Steven C Haase; Warren C Hammert; Jeffrey N Lawton; Greg A Merrell; Paul F Nassab; Lynda J S Yang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 7.  Measuring outcomes in hand surgery.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.017

8.  The minimal clinically important difference after simple decompression for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Authors:  Sunitha Malay; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Relationship between Patient Expectations and Clinical Measures in Patients Undergoing Rheumatoid Hand Surgery from the Silicone Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis (SARA) Study.

Authors:  Erika D Sears; Patricia B Burns; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  Measurement scales in clinical research of the upper extremity, part 2: outcome measures in studies of the hand/wrist and shoulder/elbow.

Authors:  Marie Badalamente; Laureen Coffelt; John Elfar; Glenn Gaston; Warren Hammert; Jerry Huang; Lisa Lattanza; Joy Macdermid; Greg Merrell; David Netscher; Zubin Panthaki; Greg Rafijah; Douglas Trczinski; Brent Graham
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.