Literature DB >> 19255946

The speed of free will.

Todd S Horowitz1, Jeremy M Wolfe, George A Alvarez, Michael A Cohen, Yoana I Kuzmova.   

Abstract

Do voluntary and task-driven shifts of attention have the same time course? In order to measure the time needed to voluntarily shift attention, we devised several novel visual search tasks that elicited multiple sequential attentional shifts. Participants could only respond correctly if they attended to the right place at the right time. In control conditions, search tasks were similar but participants were not required to shift attention in any order. Across five experiments, voluntary shifts of attention required 200-300 ms. Control conditions yielded estimates of 35-100 ms for task-driven shifts. We suggest that the slower speed of voluntary shifts reflects the "clock speed of free will". Wishing to attend to something takes more time than shifting attention in response to sensory input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19255946     DOI: 10.1080/17470210902732155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  10 in total

1.  A unique role of endogenous visual-spatial attention in rapid processing of multiple targets.

Authors:  Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; German Palafox; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Voluntary attention increases perceived spatial frequency.

Authors:  Jared Abrams; Antoine Barbot; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09-29

4.  Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention.

Authors:  J Patrick Mayo; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Susceptible to distraction: children lack top-down control over spatial attention capture.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Tessa Margett-Jordan; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

6.  Distinguishing between parallel and serial accounts of multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Michael A Cohen; Yair Pinto; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Rapid volitional control of apparent motion during percept generation.

Authors:  Julia A Mossbridge; Laura Ortega; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  For whom the bell tolls: periodic reactivation of sensory cortex in the gamma band as a substrate of visual working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Marieke Karlijn Van Vugt; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Jean-Philippe Lachaux
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  On spatial attention and its field size on the repulsion effect.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Cutrone; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  New Evidence for Strategic Differences between Static and Dynamic Search Tasks: An Individual Observer Analysis of Eye Movements.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.