Literature DB >> 19255792

A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with mechanical lumbar traction.

Congcong Cai1, Yong Hao Pua, Kian Chong Lim.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to develop a clinical prediction rule for identifying patients with low back pain, who improved with mechanical lumbar traction. A prospective, cohort study was conducted in a physiotherapy clinic at a local hospital. Patients with low back pain, referred to physiotherapy were included in the study. The intervention was a standardized mechanical lumbar traction program, which comprised three sessions provided within 9 days. Patient demographic information, standard physical examination, numeric pain scale, fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire and Oswestry low back pain disability index (pre- and post-intervention) were recorded. A total of 129 patients participated in the study and 25 had positive response to the mechanical lumbar traction. A clinical prediction rule with four variables (non-involvement of manual work, low level fear-avoidance beliefs, no neurological deficit and age above 30 years) was identified. The presence of all four variables (positive likelihood ratio = 9.36) increased the probability of response rate with mechanical lumbar traction from 19.4 to 69.2%. It appears that patients with low back pain who were likely to respond to mechanical lumbar traction may be identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19255792      PMCID: PMC2899473          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0909-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

1.  1989 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Reproducibility of physical signs in low-back pain.

Authors:  P F McCombe; J C Fairbank; B C Cockersole; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: patients consulting primary care for the first time.

Authors:  Margreth Grotle; Jens I Brox; Merit B Veierød; Bredo Glomsrød; Jan H Lønn; Nina K Vøllestad
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.

Authors:  W S Marras; J Parakkat; A M Chany; G Yang; D Burr; S A Lavender
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica.

Authors:  J A Clarke; M W van Tulder; S E I Blomberg; H C W de Vet; G J M G van der Heijden; G Bronfort
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

5.  Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program.

Authors:  Gregory E Hicks; Julie M Fritz; Anthony Delitto; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Clinical course and impact of fear-avoidance beliefs in low back pain: prospective cohort study of acute and chronic low back pain: II.

Authors:  Margreth Grotle; Nina K Vøllestad; Jens I Brox
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability.

Authors:  G Crombez; J W Vlaeyen; P H Heuts; R Lysens
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Current use of lumbar traction in the management of low back pain: results of a survey of physiotherapists in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Annette Agnes Harte; Jacqueline Helen Gracey; George David Baxter
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability.

Authors:  Gordon Waddell; Mary Newton; Iain Henderson; Douglas Somerville; Chris J Main
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Relationship of physical examination findings and self-reported symptom severity and physical function in patients with degenerative lumbar conditions.

Authors:  Mark A Lyle; Sarah Manes; Michael McGuinness; Sarah Ziaei; Maura D Iversen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-02
View more
  10 in total

1.  So Close and Yet so Far-Growth and Progress in the Accessory Motion Testing Literature.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Manual unloading of the lumbar spine: can it identify immediate responders to mechanical traction in a low back pain population? A study of reliability and criterion referenced predictive validity.

Authors:  Brian T Swanson; Sean P Riley; Mark P Cote; Robin R Leger; Isaac L Moss; John Carlos
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-05

4.  Prediction of pain outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of dose-response of spinal manipulation for the care of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Darcy Vavrek; Mitchell Haas; Moni Blazej Neradilek; Nayak Polissar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Quantitative sensory testing changes in the successful management of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Benjamin J Geletka; Michael A O'Hearn; Carol A Courtney
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-02

6.  Immediate and short-term effects of mulligan concept positional sustained natural apophyseal glides on an athletic young-adult population classified with mechanical neck pain: an exploratory investigation.

Authors:  Dawn P Andrews; Kari B Odland-Wolf; James May; Russell Baker; Alan Nasypany; Eric M Dinkins
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-04-16

7.  Performance of Pain Interventionalists From Different Specialties in Treating Degenerative Disk Disease-Related Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Weibin Shi; Edeanya Agbese; Adnan Z Solaiman; Douglas L Leslie; David R Gater
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-05-19

8.  Derivation of clinical prediction rules for identifying patients with non-acute low back pain who respond best to a lumbar stabilization exercise program at post-treatment and six-month follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Larivière; Khalil Rabhi; Richard Preuss; Marie-France Coutu; Nicolas Roy; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Prevalence and reliability of treatment-based classification for subgrouping patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Isadora Orlando de Oliveira; Rodrigo Antunes de Vasconcelos; Bruna Pilz; Paulo Eduardo Portes Teixeira; Eduarda de Faria Ferreira; Wilson Mello; Débora Bevilaqua Grossi
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2017-07-05

Review 10.  Clinical Decision Support Tools for Selecting Interventions for Patients with Disabling Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Susan Armijo-Olivo; William S Shaw; Kelly Williams-Whitt; Nicola T Shaw; Jan Hartvigsen; Ziling Qin; Christine Ha; Linda J Woodhouse; Ivan A Steenstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.