Literature DB >> 19255206

Acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents. Surgical technique.

Yrjänä Nietosvaara1, Reijo Paukku, Sauli Palmu, Simon T Donell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of acute patellar dislocation in children is controversial. Some investigators have advocated early repair of the medial structures, whereas others have treated this injury nonoperatively. The present report describes the long-term subjective and functional results of a randomized controlled trial of nonoperative and operative treatment of primary acute patellar dislocation in children less than sixteen years of age.
METHODS: The data were gathered prospectively on a cohort of seventy-four acute patellar dislocations in seventy-one patients (fifty-one girls and twenty boys) younger than sixteen years of age. Sixty-two patients (sixty-four knees) without large (>15 mm) intra-articular fragments were randomized to nonoperative treatment (twenty-eight knees) or operative treatment (thirty-six knees). Operative treatment consisted of direct repair of the damaged medial structures if the patella was dislocatable with the patient under anesthesia (twenty-nine knees) or lateral release alone if the patella was not dislocatable with the patient under anesthesia (seven knees). All but four patients who underwent operative treatment had a concomitant lateral release. The rehabilitation protocol was the same for both groups. The patients were seen at two years, and a telephone interview was conducted at a mean of six years and again at a mean of fourteen years. Fifty-eight patients (sixty-four knees; 94%) were reviewed at the time of the most recent follow-up.
RESULTS: At the time of the most recent follow-up, the subjective result was either good or excellent for 75% (twenty-one) of twenty-eight nonoperatively treated knees and 66% (twenty-one) of thirty-two operatively treated knees. The rates of recurrent dislocation in the two treatment groups were 71% (twenty of twenty-eight) and 67% (twenty-four of thirty-six), respectively. The first redislocation occurred within two years after the primary injury in twenty-three (52%) of the forty-four knees with recurrent dislocation. Instability of the contralateral patella was noted in thirty (48%) of the sixty-two patients. The only significant predictor for recurrence was a positive family history of patellar instability. The mode of treatment and the existence of osteochondral fractures had no clinical or significant influence on the subjective outcome, recurrent patellofemoral instability, function, or activity scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The long-term subjective and functional results after acute patellar dislocation are satisfactory in most patients. Initial operative repair of the medial structures combined with lateral release did not improve the long-term outcome, despite the very high rate of recurrent instability. A positive family history is a risk factor for recurrence and for contralateral patellofemoral instability. Routine repair of the torn medial stabilizing soft tissues is not advocated for the treatment of acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19255206     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

1.  Complications in brief: Arthroscopic lateral release.

Authors:  Hussein Elkousy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Injury patterns of medial patellofemoral ligament after acute lateral patellar dislocation in children: Correlation analysis with anatomical variants and articular cartilage lesion of the patella.

Authors:  Guang-Ying Zhang; Lei Zheng; Hao Shi; Bing-Jun Ji; Yan Feng; Hong-Yu Ding
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Operative versus non-operative management of patellar dislocation. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Fujian Song; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Dislocations of the patella].

Authors:  T Wirth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Acute patellar dislocation. What to do?

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Michele Vasso; Simone Cerciello
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Patellar dislocation in skeletally immature patients: semitendinosous and gracilis augmentation for combined medial patellofemoral and medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Marco Giordano; Francesco Falciglia; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Vincenzo Guzzanti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Midterm results of combined patellofemoral and patellotibial ligaments reconstruction in recurrent patellar dislocation.

Authors:  Mohamed Hassan Sobhy; Mahmoud A Mahran; Ezzat Mohamed Kamel
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-04-24

8.  Does the Utilization of Allograft Tissue in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Restore Patellar Stability?

Authors:  Eric Hohn; Nirav K Pandya
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  MRI findings associated with medial patellofemoral capsuloligamentous plication.

Authors:  William R Walter; Hien Pham; Robert J Meislin; Laith M Jazrawi; Christopher J Burke
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Patient-based outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Takehiko Matsushita; Shinya Oka; Daisuke Araki; Kyohei Nishida; Toshikazu Tanaka; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Kotaro Nishida; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.