William R Walter1, Hien Pham2, Robert J Meislin2, Laith M Jazrawi2, Christopher J Burke3. 1. Department of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Division, NYU Langone Medical Center, 301 E. 17th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10003, USA. William.Walter@nyumc.org. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Division, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the MRI appearance of medial patellofemoral capsuloligamentous plication (also known as reefing or imbrication) for proximal patellar realignment in patients with patellofemoral instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of our surgical and PACS databases identified cases of medial plication performed between June 2011 and July 2016. Pre- and postoperative MRI characteristics were reviewed. Correlation was made with operative reports and clinical records to define postoperative appearances on MRI. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent medial plication during the study period; 29 were excluded owing to a lack of postoperative imaging. Ultimately, 12 knees were included in 11 patients who had postoperative MRI studies available (8 women and 3 men, mean age 27.3 ± 10.2 years). Ten (83%) of the surgeries were performed open and 2 (17%) arthroscopically. There were differences in the post-surgical MRI appearance of medial plications carried out after surgery using the open and arthroscopic techniques. The open technique produces a "heaped up" distal vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) with centralized patellar insertion (100%), which was absent in the case of arthroscopic plication, where subtle medial retinaculum thickening was demonstrated without alteration of its patellar insertion. The mean postoperative lateral patellar and patellofemoral congruence angles measured 2.5° ± 5.6° and 12.4° ± 19.9° respectively. A significant association was found regarding change in patellofemoral alignment (p = 0.018 and p = 0.004 respectively). CONCLUSION: The MRI appearance of medial plication is not well described in the radiology literature; radiologists should be familiar with anticipated post-plication findings to avoid potential confusion for pathology and allow more accurate interpretation of postoperative imaging findings from this common surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To review the MRI appearance of medial patellofemoral capsuloligamentous plication (also known as reefing or imbrication) for proximal patellar realignment in patients with patellofemoral instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of our surgical and PACS databases identified cases of medial plication performed between June 2011 and July 2016. Pre- and postoperative MRI characteristics were reviewed. Correlation was made with operative reports and clinical records to define postoperative appearances on MRI. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent medial plication during the study period; 29 were excluded owing to a lack of postoperative imaging. Ultimately, 12 knees were included in 11 patients who had postoperative MRI studies available (8 women and 3 men, mean age 27.3 ± 10.2 years). Ten (83%) of the surgeries were performed open and 2 (17%) arthroscopically. There were differences in the post-surgical MRI appearance of medial plications carried out after surgery using the open and arthroscopic techniques. The open technique produces a "heaped up" distal vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) with centralized patellar insertion (100%), which was absent in the case of arthroscopic plication, where subtle medial retinaculum thickening was demonstrated without alteration of its patellar insertion. The mean postoperative lateral patellar and patellofemoral congruence angles measured 2.5° ± 5.6° and 12.4° ± 19.9° respectively. A significant association was found regarding change in patellofemoral alignment (p = 0.018 and p = 0.004 respectively). CONCLUSION: The MRI appearance of medial plication is not well described in the radiology literature; radiologists should be familiar with anticipated post-plication findings to avoid potential confusion for pathology and allow more accurate interpretation of postoperative imaging findings from this common surgery.