Literature DB >> 19253340

Fractional limb volume--a soft tissue parameter of fetal body composition: validation, technical considerations and normal ranges during pregnancy.

W Lee1, M Balasubramaniam, R L Deter, S S Hassan, F Gotsch, J P Kusanovic, L F Gonçalves, R Romero.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The main goals were to provide normal reference ranges for fractional limb volume as a new index of generalized fetal nutritional status, to evaluate the reproducibility of fractional fetal limb volume measurements during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, and to demonstrate technical considerations for this technique.
METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study of gravid women during mid to late pregnancy. Fractional limb volumes were based on either 50% of humeral or femoral diaphysis length. Each partial volume was subdivided into five equidistant slices that were centered along the mid-arm or mid-thigh. Slices were traced manually to obtain fractional arm (AVol) or fractional thigh (TVol) volume. Reproducibility studies were performed, using Bland-Altman plots, to assess blinded interobserver and intraobserver measurement bias and agreement. Selected images were chosen to demonstrate technical factors for the acquisition and analysis of these parameters. Reference charts were established to describe normal ranges for AVol and TVol.
RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty-seven subjects were scanned to include 380 AVol (range, 1.1-68.3 mL) and 378 TVol (range 2.0-163.2 mL) measurements between 18.0 and 42.1 weeks' menstrual age. No gender differences were found in these soft tissue measurements (AVol, P = 0.90; TVol, P = 0.91; Mann-Whitney test). Intraobserver mean bias +/- SD and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for fractional limb volumes were: 2.2 +/- 4.2% (95% LOA, - 6.0 to 10.5%) for AVol and 2.0 +/- 4.2% (95% LOA, - 6.3 to 10.3%) for TVol. Interobserver bias and agreement were - 1.9 +/- 4.9% (95% LOA, - 11.6 to 7.8%) for AVol and - 2.0 +/- 5.4% (95% LOA, - 12.5 to 8.6%) for TVol. Technical factors were related to image optimization, transducer pressure, fetal movement, soft tissue compression and amniotic fluid volume.
CONCLUSIONS: Fractional limb volume assessment may improve the detection and monitoring of malnourished fetuses because this soft tissue parameter can be obtained quickly and reproducibly during mid to late pregnancy. Careful attention should be placed on technical factors that can potentially affect optimal acquisition and analysis of these volume measurements. (c) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19253340      PMCID: PMC3546835          DOI: 10.1002/uog.6319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  42 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Three-dimensional qualitative sonographic evaluation of fetal soft tissue.

Authors:  M Matsumoto; T Yanagihara; T Hata
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Differential growth of fetal tissues during the second half of pregnancy.

Authors:  I M Bernstein; M I Goran; S B Amini; P M Catalano
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Three-dimensional ultrasound-assessed fetal thigh volumetry in predicting birth weight.

Authors:  F M Chang; R I Liang; H C Ko; B L Yao; C H Chang; C H Yu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements.

Authors:  S P Chauhan; D J West; J A Scardo; J M Boyd; J Joiner; N W Hendrix
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology.

Authors:  D G Altman; L S Chitty
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-01

7.  Ultrasonographic measurement of cheek-to-cheek diameter in fetal growth disturbances.

Authors:  J S Abramowicz; D M Sherer; J R Woods
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Practical assessment of neonatal nutrition status beyond birthweight: an imperative for the 1990s.

Authors:  R B Beattie; P Johnson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-10

9.  Subcutaneous fat in the fetal abdomen as a predictor of growth restriction.

Authors:  F Gardeil; R Greene; B Stuart; M J Turner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Prediction of fetal macrosomia using sonographically measured abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness.

Authors:  B M Petrikovsky; C Oleschuk; M Lesser; N Gelertner; B Gross
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 0.910

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional ultrasound of the fetus: how does it help?

Authors:  Luis F Gonçalves
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-01-29

2.  Prospective validation of fetal weight estimation using fractional limb volume.

Authors:  W Lee; R Deter; H Sangi-Haghpeykar; L Yeo; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  The relationship of newborn adiposity to fetal growth outcome based on birth weight or the modified neonatal growth assessment score.

Authors:  Wesley Lee; Thomas Riggs; Winston Koo; Russell L Deter; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-05-29

4.  Newborn adiposity measured by plethysmography is not predicted by late gestation two-dimensional ultrasound measures of fetal growth.

Authors:  Laurie J Moyer-Mileur; Hillarie Slater; J Anne Thomson; Nicole Mihalopoulos; Jan Byrne; Michael W Varner
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  New fetal weight estimation models using fractional limb volume.

Authors:  W Lee; M Balasubramaniam; R L Deter; L Yeo; S S Hassan; F Gotsch; J P Kusanovic; L F Gonçalves; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight.

Authors:  Mojgan Kalantari; Arezou Negahdari; Shima Roknsharifi; Mostafa Qorbani
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2013-11

7.  Serum activin A and follistatin levels in gestational diabetes and the association of the Activin A-Follistatin system with anthropometric parameters in offspring.

Authors:  Silvia Näf; Xavier Escote; Mónica Ballesteros; Rosa Elena Yañez; Inmaculada Simón-Muela; Pilar Gil; Gerard Albaiges; Joan Vendrell; Ana Megia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Antenatal exercise in overweight and obese women and its effects on offspring and maternal health: design and rationale of the IMPROVE (Improving Maternal and Progeny Obesity Via Exercise) randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sumudu N Seneviratne; Graham K Parry; Lesley Me McCowan; Alec Ekeroma; Yannan Jiang; Silmara Gusso; Geovana Peres; Raquel O Rodrigues; Susan Craigie; Wayne S Cutfield; Paul L Hofman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Fractional fetal thigh volume in the prediction of normal and abnormal fetal growth during the third trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Louise E Simcox; Jenny E Myers; Tim J Cole; Edward D Johnstone
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Newer Insights Into Fetal Growth and Body Composition.

Authors:  Satoru Ikenoue; Yoshifumi Kasuga; Toyohide Endo; Mamoru Tanaka; Daigo Ochiai
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.