Literature DB >> 19251834

A comparison of the quality of care provided to cancer patients in the UK in the last three months of life in in-patient hospices compared with hospitals, from the perspective of bereaved relatives: results from a survey using the VOICES questionnaire.

J M Addington-Hall1, A C O'Callaghan.   

Abstract

The importance of evaluating systematically the effectiveness of hospice care has been noted for at least 20 years. There is, however, limited evidence about whether and how the care provided to terminally ill patients by in-patient hospices in the UK differs from that provided in NHS hospitals. In this article, we, therefore, present a comparison of hospice in-patient care and hospital care for cancer patients in the UK, from the perspective of bereaved relatives who had experienced both types of care during the last 3 months of the patient's life. The Office of National Statistics drew a random sample of 800 deaths in South London in 2002, and sent the person who registered the death (the informant) a Views of Informal Carers - Evaluation of Services (VOICES) questionnaire 3-9 months after the death, with up to two reminders. There was a response rate of 48%. For this analysis, 40 cancer patients whose informant reported both a hospice in-patient admission and a hospital admission in the last 3 months of life were identified. Informants answered the same questions about each admission and responses on these were compared. There were statistically significant differences between respondents' views of hospice and hospital care on eight out of 13 variables measuring aspects of satisfaction with care, with a trend towards statistical significance on a further two: in all cases respondents rated hospice care more positively than hospital care. There were no differences in the experience of pain and breathlessness in the two settings, but respondents rated pain control by the hospice as more effective. In comparison to hospital care, from the perspective of bereaved relatives, hospice in-patient care provided better pain control, better communication with patients and families, and better medical, nursing and personal care, which treated the patient with more dignity. Further research is needed to confirm these findings using a wider sample of in-patient hospices in the UK and including the perspectives of patients. Providing high quality care for terminally ill patients in acute hospitals remains an important challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19251834     DOI: 10.1177/0269216309102525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  28 in total

Review 1.  Measuring Experience With End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Jessica Penn Lendon; Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Anne M Walling; Karl A Lorenz; Oluwatobi A Oluwatola; Rebecca Anhang Price; Denise Quigley; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  The Experience of Hospital Death: Assessing the Quality of Care at an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Elise C Carey; Ann M Dose; Katherine M Humeniuk; Yichen C Kuan; Ashley D Hicks; Abigale L Ottenberg; Jon C Tilburt; Barbara Koenig
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Measuring Patient-Centeredness of Care for Seriously Ill Individuals: Challenges and Opportunities for Accountability Initiatives.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Marc N Elliott
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 4.  Achieving Goal-Concordant Care: A Conceptual Model and Approach to Measuring Serious Illness Communication and Its Impact.

Authors:  Justin J Sanders; J Randall Curtis; James A Tulsky
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Hospice caregivers' experiences with pain management: "I'm not a doctor, and I don't know if I helped her go faster or slower".

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Karla Washington; Robin L Kruse; David L Albright; Paula K Baldwin; Amy Boxer; George Demiris
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 6.  Measuring Goal-Concordant Care in Palliative Care Research.

Authors:  Natalie C Ernecoff; Kathryn L Wessell; Antonia V Bennett; Laura C Hanson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.576

7.  Determinants of care outcomes for patients who die in hospital in Ireland: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Kieran McKeown; Trutz Haase; Jonathan Pratschke; Shelagh Twomey; Helen Donovan; Feline Engling
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  The prevalence of severe pain, its etiopathological characteristics and treatment profile of patients referred to a tertiary cancer care pain clinic.

Authors:  P N Jain; Kaveri Pai; Aparna S Chatterjee
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2015 May-Aug

9.  Support received by family members before, at and after an ill person's death.

Authors:  Anna O'Sullivan; Anette Alvariza; Joakim Öhlén; Cecilia Larsdotter
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Does the 'Liverpool Care Pathway' facilitate an improvement in quality of care for dying cancer patients?

Authors:  C R Mayland; E M I Williams; J Addington-Hall; T F Cox; J E Ellershaw
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.