Literature DB >> 29091531

Measuring Patient-Centeredness of Care for Seriously Ill Individuals: Challenges and Opportunities for Accountability Initiatives.

Rebecca Anhang Price1, Marc N Elliott2.   

Abstract

Patient- and family-centeredness of care is particularly important for individuals with serious illness. In this article, we describe methodological challenges of using measures of patient- and family-centeredness in accountability initiatives such as public reporting and pay for performance. We begin with background on measuring patient- and family-centered care using standardized surveys, describe evidence of the use of these measures for quality improvement, and highlight methodological challenges in the development and implementation of these measures for use in accountability. To ensure that patient- and family-centeredness is the cornerstone of public and private accountability initiatives designed to promote high-quality care to seriously ill patients, we recommend development of (1) a nationally endorsed survey instrument that assesses patient and family experiences of serious illness care across the full range of patient trajectories and care settings in which this care is provided; (2) administrative data infrastructure that allows for identification and outreach to the most knowledgeable respondents for the survey, regardless of the patient's setting of care; and (3) a broad toolkit of quality improvement approaches to ensure that as the emphasis on accountability grows, providers across settings have access to tools that can help them improve patient- and family-centeredness of care for the seriously ill.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accountability initiatives; family-centeredness; patient-centeredness; quality improvement approaches

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29091531      PMCID: PMC5756456          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  73 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.

Authors:  R D Hays; J A Shaul; V S Williams; J S Lubalin; L D Harris-Kojetin; S F Sweeny; P D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Family evaluation of hospice care: results from voluntary submission of data via website.

Authors:  Stephen R Connor; Joan Teno; Carol Spence; Neal Smith
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Racial differences in next-of-kin participation in an ongoing survey of satisfaction with end-of-life care: a study of a study.

Authors:  Kimberly S Johnson; Katja Elbert-Avila; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; James A Tulsky
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 4.  Nationwide veterans affairs quality measure for cancer: the family assessment of treatment at end of life.

Authors:  Esme Finlay; Scott Shreve; David Casarett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Family members' care expectations, care perceptions, and satisfaction with advanced cancer care: results of a multi-site pilot study.

Authors:  L J Kristjanson; A Leis; P M Koop; K C Carrière; B Mueller
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.250

6.  Caregiver satisfaction with out-patient oncology services: utility of the FAMCARE instrument and development of the FAMCARE-6.

Authors:  Gregory Leigh Carter; Terry J Lewin; Louisa Gianacas; Kerrie Clover; Catherine Adams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  The Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Study (CAHPS) survey of children's health care.

Authors:  C J Homer; F J Fowler; P M Gallagher; J Shaul; M Uyeda; A Zaslavsky; V Wilson; P Cleary
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1999-07

8.  Measuring quality of palliative care: psychometric properties of the FAMCARE Scale.

Authors:  Gerd Inger Ringdal; Marit S Jordhøy; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Patients dying with dementia: experience at the end of life and impact of hospice care.

Authors:  Joseph W Shega; Gavin W Hougham; Carol B Stocking; Deon Cox-Hayley; Greg A Sachs
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 10.  The Effects of Pay-for-Performance Programs on Health, Health Care Use, and Processes of Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aaron Mendelson; Karli Kondo; Cheryl Damberg; Allison Low; Makalapua Motúapuaka; Michele Freeman; Maya O'Neil; Rose Relevo; Devan Kansagara
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  4 in total

1.  Refining Patient-Centered Measures of End-of-Life Care Quality for Children With Cancer.

Authors:  Prasanna Ananth; Sophia Mun; Noora Reffat; Soo Jung Kang; Sarah Pitafi; Xiaomei Ma; Cary P Gross; Joanne Wolfe
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-10-06

2.  Charting a path to high-quality end-of-life care for children with cancer.

Authors:  Prasanna Ananth; Joanne Wolfe; Emily E Johnston
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.921

3.  How representative are colorectal, lung, breast and prostate cancer patients responding to the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES) of the cancer registry population in England? A population-based case control study.

Authors:  Saleh A Alessy; Elizabeth A Davies; Janette Rawlinson; Matthew Baker; Margreet Lüchtenborg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Adding telephone follow-up can improve representativeness of surveys of seriously ill people.

Authors:  Maria DeYoreo; Rebecca Anhang Price; Melissa A Bradley; Danielle Schlang; Cheryl K Montemayor; Anagha Tolpadi; Paul D Cleary; Joan M Teno; Marc N Elliott
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 7.538

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.