Literature DB >> 19251824

The major human pregnane X receptor (PXR) splice variant, PXR.2, exhibits significantly diminished ligand-activated transcriptional regulation.

Yvonne S Lin1, Kazuto Yasuda, Mahfoud Assem, Cynthia Cline, Joe Barber, Chia-Wei Li, Vladyslav Kholodovych, Ni Ai, J Don Chen, William J Welsh, Sean Ekins, Erin G Schuetz.   

Abstract

The pregnane X receptor (PXR; PXR.1) can be activated by structurally diverse lipophilic ligands. PXR.2, an alternatively spliced form of PXR, lacks 111 nucleotides encoding 37 amino acids in the ligand binding domain. PXR.2 bound a classic CYP3A4 PXR response element (PXRE) in electrophoretic mobility shift assays, but transfected PXR.2 failed to transactivate a CYP3A4-promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid in HepG2 cells treated with various PXR ligands. Cotransfection experiments showed that PXR.2 behaved as a dominant negative, interfering with PXR.1/rifampin activation of CYP3A4-PXRE-LUC. In HepG2 and LS180 cells stably transduced with PXR.1, PXR target genes (CYP3A4, MDR1, CYP2B6, and UGT1A1) were higher than mock-transduced cells in the absence of ligand and were further induced in the presence of rifampin. In contrast, PXR.2 stably introduced into the same host cells failed to induce target genes over levels in mock-transfected cells after drug treatment. Our homology modeling suggests that ligands bind PXR.1 more favorably, probably because of the presence of a key disordered loop region, which is missing in PXR.2. Yeast two-hybrid assays revealed that, even in the presence of ligand, the corepressors remain tightly bound to PXR.2, and coactivators are unable to bind at helix 12. In summary, PXR.2 can bind to PXREs but fails to transactivate target genes because ligands do not bind the ligand binding domain of PXR.2 productively, corepressors remain tightly bound, and coactivators are not recruited to PXR.2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19251824      PMCID: PMC2683691          DOI: 10.1124/dmd.108.025213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  40 in total

1.  Promiscuous regulator of xenobiotic removal.

Authors:  E Schuetz; S Strom
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  A ligand-based approach to understanding selectivity of nuclear hormone receptors PXR, CAR, FXR, LXRalpha, and LXRbeta.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Leonid Mirny; Erin G Schuetz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  The pregnane X receptor: a promiscuous xenobiotic receptor that has diverged during evolution.

Authors:  S A Jones; L B Moore; J L Shenk; G B Wisely; G A Hamilton; D D McKee; N C Tomkinson; E L LeCluyse; M H Lambert; T M Willson; S A Kliewer; J T Moore
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2000-01

4.  Regulation and binding of pregnane X receptor by nuclear receptor corepressor silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT).

Authors:  David R Johnson; Chia-Wei Li; Liuh-Yow Chen; Jagadish C Ghosh; J Don Chen
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Alternative splicing in concert with protein intrinsic disorder enables increased functional diversity in multicellular organisms.

Authors:  Pedro R Romero; Saima Zaidi; Ya Yin Fang; Vladimir N Uversky; Predrag Radivojac; Christopher J Oldfield; Marc S Cortese; Megan Sickmeier; Tanguy LeGall; Zoran Obradovic; A Keith Dunker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Functional and structural comparison of PXR and CAR.

Authors:  John T Moore; Linda B Moore; Jodi M Maglich; Steve A Kliewer
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2003-02-17

7.  A comprehensive in vitro and in silico analysis of antibiotics that activate pregnane X receptor and induce CYP3A4 in liver and intestine.

Authors:  Kazuto Yasuda; Aarati Ranade; Raman Venkataramanan; Stephen Strom; Jonathan Chupka; Sean Ekins; Erin Schuetz; Kenneth Bachmann
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  A chemical, genetic, and structural analysis of the nuclear bile acid receptor FXR.

Authors:  Michael Downes; Mark A Verdecia; A J Roecker; Robert Hughes; John B Hogenesch; Heidi R Kast-Woelbern; Marianne E Bowman; Jean-Luc Ferrer; Andrew M Anisfeld; Peter A Edwards; John M Rosenfeld; Jacqueline G A Alvarez; Joseph P Noel; K C Nicolaou; Ronald M Evans
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Functional evolution of the vitamin D and pregnane X receptors.

Authors:  Erica J Reschly; Afonso Celso Dias Bainy; Jaco Joaquim Mattos; Lee R Hagey; Nathan Bahary; Sripal R Mada; Junhai Ou; Raman Venkataramanan; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Evolution of pharmacologic specificity in the pregnane X receptor.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Erica J Reschly; Lee R Hagey; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Pregnane xenobiotic receptor in cancer pathogenesis and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Satyanarayana R Pondugula; Sridhar Mani
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 2.  Function of alternative splicing.

Authors:  Olga Kelemen; Paolo Convertini; Zhaiyi Zhang; Yuan Wen; Manli Shen; Marina Falaleeva; Stefan Stamm
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Sources of Interindividual Variability.

Authors:  Yvonne S Lin; Kenneth E Thummel; Brice D Thompson; Rheem A Totah; Christi W Cho
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Identification of Susceptibility Loci and Genes for Colorectal Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Chenjie Zeng; Koichi Matsuda; Wei-Hua Jia; Jiang Chang; Sun-Seog Kweon; Yong-Bing Xiang; Aesun Shin; Sun Ha Jee; Dong-Hyun Kim; Ben Zhang; Qiuyin Cai; Xingyi Guo; Jirong Long; Nan Wang; Regina Courtney; Zhi-Zhong Pan; Chen Wu; Atsushi Takahashi; Min-Ho Shin; Keitaro Matsuo; Fumihiko Matsuda; Yu-Tang Gao; Jae Hwan Oh; Soriul Kim; Keum Ji Jung; Yoon-Ok Ahn; Zefang Ren; Hong-Lan Li; Jie Wu; Jiajun Shi; Wanqing Wen; Gong Yang; Bingshan Li; Bu-Tian Ji; Hermann Brenner; Robert E Schoen; Sébastien Küry; Stephen B Gruber; Fredrick R Schumacher; Stephanie L Stenzel; Graham Casey; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Hyeong-Rok Kim; Jin-Young Jeong; Ji Won Park; Kazuo Tajima; Sang-Hee Cho; Michiaki Kubo; Xiao-Ou Shu; Dongxin Lin; Yi-Xin Zeng; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Tumor suppressor protein p53 negatively regulates human pregnane X receptor activity.

Authors:  Ayesha Elias; Jing Wu; Taosheng Chen
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 6.  Xenobiotic-sensing nuclear receptors involved in drug metabolism: a structural perspective.

Authors:  Bret D Wallace; Matthew R Redinbo
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.518

7.  Pregnane X Receptor and Cancer: Context-Specificity is Key.

Authors:  Satyanarayana R Pondugula; Petr Pavek; Sridhar Mani
Journal:  Nucl Receptor Res       Date:  2016-06-12

8.  Chemical approaches to nuclear receptors in metabolism.

Authors:  Ronald N Margolis; David D Moore; Timothy M Willson; R Kip Guy
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 9.  Role of pregnane X receptor in chemotherapeutic treatment.

Authors:  Wei Zhuo; Lei Hu; Jinfeng Lv; Hongbing Wang; Honghao Zhou; Lan Fan
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Human PXR-mediated induction of intestinal CYP3A4 attenuates 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ function in human colon adenocarcinoma LS180 cells.

Authors:  Xi Emily Zheng; Zhican Wang; Michael Z Liao; Yvonne S Lin; Margaret C Shuhart; Erin G Schuetz; Kenneth E Thummel
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.