Literature DB >> 19251248

Genetic variability in the dopamine system (dopamine receptor D4, catechol-O-methyltransferase) modulates neurophysiological responses to gains and losses.

Josep Marco-Pallarés1, David Cucurell, Toni Cunillera, Ulrike M Krämer, Estela Càmara, Wido Nager, Peter Bauer, Rebecca Schüle, Ludger Schöls, Thomas F Münte, Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interindividual variability in the processing of reward might be partially explained by genetic differences in the dopamine system. Here, we study whether brain responses (event-related potentials [ERPs], oscillatory activity) to monetary gains and losses in normal human subjects are modulated as a function of two dopaminergic polymorphisms (catechol-O-methyltransferase [COMT] valine [Val]158methionine [Met], dopamine receptor D4 [DRD4] single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] -521).
METHODS: Forty participants homozygous for the different alleles of both polymorphisms were selected from a larger population to assess the main effects and interactions. Based on the phasic/tonic dopamine hypothesis, we expected increased brain responses to losses and gains in participants homozygous for the Val/Val variant of the COMT polymorphism (related to higher enzyme activity).
RESULTS: The medial frontal negativity (MFN) of the ERP and the increase in beta power for gains were enhanced for participants homozygous for the COMT ValVal allele when compared with homozygous MetMet participants. In contrast, no modulations in gain- and loss-related brain activity were found to be a function of the DRD4 SNP -521 polymorphism.
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the role of the COMT Val/Met polymorphism in the processing of reward, consistent with theoretical explanations that suggest the possible role of dopamine in the MFN and beta power increase generation. In addition, the present results might agree with the phasic/tonic dopamine theory that predicts higher phasic dopamine responses in ValVal participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19251248     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  29 in total

1.  Impact of COMT Val158Met-polymorphism on appetitive conditioning and amygdala/prefrontal effective connectivity.

Authors:  Tim Klucken; Onno Kruse; Sina Wehrum-Osinsky; Juergen Hennig; Jan Schweckendiek; Rudolf Stark
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Brain oscillatory activity associated with task switching and feedback processing.

Authors:  Toni Cunillera; Lluís Fuentemilla; Jose Periañez; Josep Marco-Pallarès; Ulrike M Krämer; Estela Càmara; Thomas F Münte; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  A preliminary study suggests that nicotine and prefrontal dopamine affect cortico-striatal areas in smokers with performance feedback.

Authors:  M R Lee; C L Gallen; T J Ross; P Kurup; B J Salmeron; C A Hodgkinson; D Goldman; E A Stein; M A Enoch
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.449

4.  Brain oscillatory activity of skill and chance gamblers during a slot machine game.

Authors:  Helena Alicart; Ernest Mas-Herrero; Xavier Rifà-Ros; David Cucurell; Josep Marco-Pallarés
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Event-related potentials reflect impaired temporal interval learning following haloperidol administration.

Authors:  Sarah E Forster; Patrick Zirnheld; Anantha Shekhar; Stuart R Steinhauer; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Neurophysiological differences in reward processing in anhedonics.

Authors:  Gonçalo Padrão; Aida Mallorquí; David Cucurell; Josep Marco-Pallares; Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Individual differences in control of language interference in late bilinguals are mainly related to general executive abilities.

Authors:  Julia Festman; Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.759

8.  ADHD candidate gene (DRD4 exon III) affects inhibitory control in a healthy sample.

Authors:  Ulrike M Krämer; Nuria Rojo; Rebecca Schüle; Toni Cunillera; Ludger Schöls; Josep Marco-Pallarés; David Cucurell; Estela Camara; Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-20       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  When decisions of others matter to me: an electrophysiological analysis.

Authors:  Josep Marco-Pallarés; Ulrike M Krämer; Saskia Strehl; Andrea Schröder; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Oscillatory brain activity related to control mechanisms during laboratory-induced reactive aggression.

Authors:  Ulrike M Krämer; Robert P J Kopyciok; Sylvia Richter; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.