PURPOSE: To quantify changes in fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid tumor volume on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) during the course of radiation therapy and examine its potential use in adaptive radiotherapy for tumor dose escalation or normal tissue sparing in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: As part of a pilot study, patients with Stage I-III NSCLC underwent FDG-PET/CT before radiotherapy (RT) and in mid-RT (after 40-50 Gy). Gross tumor volumes were contoured on CT and PET scans obtained before and during RT. Three-dimensional conformal RT plans were generated for each patient, first using only pretreatment CT scans. Mid-RT PET volumes were then used to design boost fields. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with FDG-avid tumors were assessed. Two patients had a complete metabolic response, and 2 patients had slightly increased FDG uptake in the adjacent lung tissue. Mid-RT PET scans were useful in the 10 remaining patients. Mean decreases in CT and PET tumor volumes were 26% (range, +15% to -75%) and 44% (range, +10% to -100%), respectively. Designing boosts based on mid-RT PET allowed for a meaningful dose escalation of 30-102 Gy (mean, 58 Gy) or a reduction in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of 0.4-3% (mean, 2%) in 5 of 6 patients with smaller yet residual tumor volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor metabolic activity and volume can change significantly after 40-50 Gy of RT. Using mid-RT PET volumes, tumor dose can be significantly escalated or NTCP reduced. Clinical studies evaluating patient outcome after PET-based adaptive RT are ongoing.
PURPOSE: To quantify changes in fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid tumor volume on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) during the course of radiation therapy and examine its potential use in adaptive radiotherapy for tumor dose escalation or normal tissue sparing in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: As part of a pilot study, patients with Stage I-III NSCLC underwent FDG-PET/CT before radiotherapy (RT) and in mid-RT (after 40-50 Gy). Gross tumor volumes were contoured on CT and PET scans obtained before and during RT. Three-dimensional conformal RT plans were generated for each patient, first using only pretreatment CT scans. Mid-RT PET volumes were then used to design boost fields. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with FDG-avid tumors were assessed. Two patients had a complete metabolic response, and 2 patients had slightly increased FDG uptake in the adjacent lung tissue. Mid-RT PET scans were useful in the 10 remaining patients. Mean decreases in CT and PET tumor volumes were 26% (range, +15% to -75%) and 44% (range, +10% to -100%), respectively. Designing boosts based on mid-RT PET allowed for a meaningful dose escalation of 30-102 Gy (mean, 58 Gy) or a reduction in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of 0.4-3% (mean, 2%) in 5 of 6 patients with smaller yet residual tumor volumes. CONCLUSIONS:Tumor metabolic activity and volume can change significantly after 40-50 Gy of RT. Using mid-RT PET volumes, tumor dose can be significantly escalated or NTCP reduced. Clinical studies evaluating patient outcome after PET-based adaptive RT are ongoing.
Authors: T Le Chevalier; R Arriagada; E Quoix; P Ruffie; M Martin; J Y Douillard; M Tarayre; M J Lacombe-Terrier; A Laplanche Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: C A Perez; K Stanley; P Rubin; S Kramer; L Brady; R Perez-Tamayo; G S Brown; J Concannon; M Rotman; H G Seydel Journal: Cancer Date: 1980-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: K Furuse; M Fukuoka; M Kawahara; H Nishikawa; Y Takada; S Kudoh; N Katagami; Y Ariyoshi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark A Socinski; David E Morris; Jan S Halle; Dominic T Moore; Thomas A Hensing; Steven A Limentani; Robert Fraser; Maureen Tynan; Andrea Mears; M Patricia Rivera; Frank C Detterbeck; Julian G Rosenman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yvette Seppenwoolde; Joos V Lebesque; Katrien de Jaeger; José S A Belderbos; Liesbeth J Boersma; Cees Schilstra; George T Henning; James A Hayman; Mary K Martel; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ramesh Rengan; Kenneth E Rosenzweig; Ennapadam Venkatraman; Lawrence A Koutcher; Jana L Fox; Reena Nayak; Howard Amols; Ellen Yorke; Andrew Jackson; C Clifton Ling; Steven A Leibel Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: S L Kwa; J V Lebesque; J C Theuws; L B Marks; M T Munley; G Bentel; D Oetzel; U Spahn; M V Graham; R E Drzymala; J A Purdy; A S Lichter; M K Martel; R K Ten Haken Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1998-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: C Schaake-Koning; W van den Bogaert; O Dalesio; J Festen; J Hoogenhout; P van Houtte; A Kirkpatrick; M Koolen; B Maat; A Nijs Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-02-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Fondevilla Soler; J L López-Guerra; A García Fernández; M A Samaniego Conde; M J Belmonte González; J M Praena-Fernandez; E Rivin Del Campo; M Alcaraz; I Azinovic Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Michael MacManus; Sarah Everitt; Tanja Schimek-Jasch; X Allen Li; Ursula Nestle; Feng-Ming Spring Kong Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2017-12
Authors: Jingbo Wang; Pawinee Mahasittiwat; Ka Kit Wong; Leslie E Quint; Feng-Ming Spring Kong Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2012-07-28 Impact factor: 5.705