Literature DB >> 19250784

Estimation and application of spatially variable noise fields in diffusion tensor imaging.

Bennett A Landman1, Pierre-Louis Bazin, Jerry L Prince.   

Abstract

Optimal interpretation of magnetic resonance image content often requires an estimate of the underlying image noise, which is typically realized as a spatially invariant estimate of the noise distribution. This is not an ideal practice in diffusion tensor imaging because the noise distribution is usually spatially varying due to the use of fast imaging and noise suppression techniques. A new estimation approach for spatially varying noise fields (NFs) is proposed in this article. The approach is based on a noise invariance property in scenarios in which more than one image, each with potentially different signal levels, is acquired on each slice, as in diffusion-weighted MRI. This technique leads to improved NF estimates in simulations, phantom experiments and in vivo studies when compared to traditional NF estimators that use regional variability or background intensity histograms. The proposed method reduces the NF estimation error by a factor of 100 in simulations, shows a strong linear correlation (R(2)=0.99) between theoretical and estimated noise changes in phantoms and demonstrates consistent (<5% variability) NF estimates in vivo. The advantages of spatially varying NF estimation are demonstrated for power analysis, outlier detection and tensor estimation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250784      PMCID: PMC2733233          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  28 in total

1.  Wavelet packet denoising of magnetic resonance images: importance of Rician noise at low SNR.

Authors:  J C Wood; K M Johnson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI.

Authors:  S Skare; M Hedehus; M E Moseley; T Q Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 3.  Automatic estimation of the noise variance from the histogram of a magnetic resonance image.

Authors:  Jan Sijbers; Dirk Poot; Arnold J den Dekker; Wouter Pintjens
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Automatic detection of brain contours in MRI data sets.

Authors:  M E Brummer; R M Mersereau; R L Eisner; R J Lewine
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Wavelet-based Rician noise removal for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R D Nowak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  Effects of signal-to-noise ratio on the accuracy and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging-derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Jonathan A D Farrell; Bennett A Landman; Craig K Jones; Seth A Smith; Jerry L Prince; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  A theoretical study of the effect of experimental noise on the measurement of anisotropy in diffusion imaging.

Authors:  M E Bastin; P A Armitage; I Marshall
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Estimation of the noise in magnitude MR images.

Authors:  J Sijbers; A J den Dekker; J Van Audekerke; M Verhoye; D Van Dyck
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging.

Authors:  L Kaufman; D M Kramer; L E Crooks; D A Ortendahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Signal-to-noise measures for magnetic resonance imagers.

Authors:  B W Murphy; P L Carson; J H Ellis; Y T Zhang; R J Hyde; T L Chenevert
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  7 in total

1.  Diffusion MRI noise mapping using random matrix theory.

Authors:  Jelle Veraart; Els Fieremans; Dmitry S Novikov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Informed RESTORE: A method for robust estimation of diffusion tensor from low redundancy datasets in the presence of physiological noise artifacts.

Authors:  Lin-Ching Chang; Lindsay Walker; Carlo Pierpaoli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Assessment of bias in experimentally measured diffusion tensor imaging parameters using SIMEX.

Authors:  Carolyn B Lauzon; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Brian C Caffo; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Region of interest correction factors improve reliability of diffusion imaging measures within and across scanners and field strengths.

Authors:  Vijay K Venkatraman; Christopher E Gonzalez; Bennett Landman; Joshua Goh; David A Reiter; Yang An; Susan M Resnick
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A simple noise correction scheme for diffusional kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  G Russell Glenn; Ali Tabesh; Jens H Jensen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Correcting power and p-value calculations for bias in diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Carolyn B Lauzon; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Diffusion weighted image denoising using overcomplete local PCA.

Authors:  José V Manjón; Pierrick Coupé; Luis Concha; Antonio Buades; D Louis Collins; Montserrat Robles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.