Literature DB >> 19250771

Further improvement in outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with optimized radiotherapy and induction plus concomitant chemotherapy: an update of the Milan experience.

Mauro Palazzi1, Ester Orlandi, Paolo Bossi, Emanuele Pignoli, Paolo Potepan, Marco Guzzo, Marzia Franceschini, Gabriele Scaramellini, Giulio Cantù, Lisa Licitra, Patrizia Olmi, Stefano Tomatis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the outcome of a consecutive series of patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), focusing on the impact of treatment-related factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2000 and 2006, 87 patients with NPC were treated with either conventional (two- or three-dimensional) radiotherapy (RT) or with intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). Of these patients, 81 (93%) received either concomitant CHT (24%) or both induction and concomitant chemotherapy (CHT) (69%). Stage was III in 36% and IV in 39% of patients. Outcomes in this study population were compared with those in the previous series of 171 patients treated during 1990 to 1999.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 46 months, actuarial rates at 3 years were the following: local control, 96%; local-regional control, 93%; distant control (DC), 90%; disease-free survival (DFS), 82%; overall survival, 90%. In Stage III to IV patients, distant control at 3 years was 56% in patients treated with concomitant CHT only and 92% in patients treated with both induction and concomitant CHT (p = 0.014). At multivariate analysis, histology, N-stage, RT technique, and total RT dose had the strongest independent impact on DFS (p < 0.05). Induction CHT had a borderline effect on DC (p = 0.07). Most dosimetric statistics were improved in the group of patients treated with IMRT compared with conventional 3D technique. All outcome endpoints were substantially better in the study population compared with those in the previous series.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcome of NPC has further improved in the study period compared with the previous decade, with a significant effect of RT technique optimization. The impact of induction CHT remains to be demonstrated in controlled trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250771     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

1.  Non-endemic locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term outcome after induction plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in everyday clinical practice.

Authors:  Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Giancarlo Tirelli; Monica Mantovani; Vittorio Baggio; Valentina Lupato; Giacomo Spinato; Alessandro Gava; Maria Cristina Da Mosto
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB‑IMRT) in nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Evangelia Peponi; Christoph Glanzmann; Guntram Kunz; Christoph Renner; Katja Tomuschat; Gabriela Studer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Prognostic value of tumor volume for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zheng Wu; Yong Su; Rui-Fang Zeng; Mo-Fa Gu; Shao-Min Huang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for detecting lymph node and distant metastases in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  G Shen; W Zhang; Z Jia; J Li; Q Wang; H Deng
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Current and emerging treatment strategies.

Authors:  Francesco Perri; Davide Bosso; Carlo Buonerba; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Giuseppina Della Vittoria Scarpati
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-10

Review 6.  Current treatment options for recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Suárez; Juan P Rodrigo; Alessandra Rinaldo; Johannes A Langendijk; Ashok R Shaha; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Conventional 2D (2DRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Francesco Moretto; Monica Rampino; Fernando Munoz; Maria Grazia Ruo Redda; Alessia Reali; Vittoria Balcet; Serena Badellino; Cristina Piva; Marina Schena; Mario Airoldi; Oliviero Ostellino; Giancarlo Pecorari; Riccardo Ragona; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Slovenia, 1990-2003 (results of treatment with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy).

Authors:  Janka Carman; Primož Strojan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-03-06

9.  Improved long-term results of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for a non-endemic European nasopharyngeal carcinoma cohort: single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Eduardo Netto; Margarida Ferreira; Susana Esteves; Isabel Sargento; Teresa Alexandre; Rute Pocinho; Antonio Mota; Miguel Labareda; Miguel Rito; José Cabeçadas; Miguel Magalhães; Margarida Roldão
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-04-28

10.  S100A8/A9 Molecular Complexes Promote Cancer Migration and Invasion via the p38 MAPK Pathway in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Bei-Bei Zhang; Xia-Ning Huang; Xiang Yi; Xue-Min Yan; Yan Cai; Qin He; Zi-Jian Han; Yuan-Jiao Huang; Wei Liu; Ai-Jun Jiao
Journal:  Bioinorg Chem Appl       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 7.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.